Renal Complications after Percutaneous Coronary Interventions on Concurrent Metformin Therapy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Clinical Medicine & Research Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.3121/cmr.2022.1759
Xenofon M Sakellariou, Theofilos M Kolettis, Dimitrios N Nikas
{"title":"Renal Complications after Percutaneous Coronary Interventions on Concurrent Metformin Therapy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Xenofon M Sakellariou,&nbsp;Theofilos M Kolettis,&nbsp;Dimitrios N Nikas","doi":"10.3121/cmr.2022.1759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Metformin, commonly prescribed in diabetic patients, can cause lactic acidosis. Although generally rare, this side effect remains a source of concern in procedures requiring contrast media, due to the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy. Temporarily withdrawing metformin during the peri-procedural period is often practiced, but clinical decisions are difficult in emergency situations, such as acute coronary syndromes. In this systematic review with meta-analysis, we aimed to further investigate the safety of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients on concurrent metformin therapy.<b>Design, Setting and Participants:</b> We analyzed studies in patients undergoing (elective or emergency) percutaneous coronary interventions with or without concurrent metformin administration, reporting on the incidence of metformin-associated lactic acidosis and peri-procedural renal function.<b>Methods:</b> PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were systematically searched without language restrictions throughout August 2022. Randomized clinical trials and observational studies were assessed with the Revised Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa quality scale, respectively. Data synthesis addressed the mean drop in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy, in addition to lactic acidosis.<b>Results:</b> Nine studies were included, totaling 2235 patients (1076 continuing metformin during the peri-procedural period), mostly with eGFR above 30 mL/min/1.73m<sup>2</sup> No cases of lactic acidosis were reported. The mean post-procedural drop in eGFR was 6.81mL/min/1.73m<sup>2</sup> (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.41 to 10.21) in the presence of metformin and 5.34 mL/min/1.73m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI: 2.98 to 7.70) in its absence. The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was not affected by concurrent metformin, as shown by a (between-groups) standardized mean difference of 0.0007 (95% CI: -0.1007 to 0.1022).<b>Conclusion:</b> Concurrent metformin during percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with relatively preserved renal function is safe, without added risk of lactic acidosis or contrast-induced nephropathy. Thus, emergency revascularization in the context of acute coronary syndromes should not be deferred. More data from clinical trials in patients with severe renal disease are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47429,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10153679/pdf/0210026.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine & Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.2022.1759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Metformin, commonly prescribed in diabetic patients, can cause lactic acidosis. Although generally rare, this side effect remains a source of concern in procedures requiring contrast media, due to the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy. Temporarily withdrawing metformin during the peri-procedural period is often practiced, but clinical decisions are difficult in emergency situations, such as acute coronary syndromes. In this systematic review with meta-analysis, we aimed to further investigate the safety of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients on concurrent metformin therapy.Design, Setting and Participants: We analyzed studies in patients undergoing (elective or emergency) percutaneous coronary interventions with or without concurrent metformin administration, reporting on the incidence of metformin-associated lactic acidosis and peri-procedural renal function.Methods: PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were systematically searched without language restrictions throughout August 2022. Randomized clinical trials and observational studies were assessed with the Revised Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa quality scale, respectively. Data synthesis addressed the mean drop in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy, in addition to lactic acidosis.Results: Nine studies were included, totaling 2235 patients (1076 continuing metformin during the peri-procedural period), mostly with eGFR above 30 mL/min/1.73m2 No cases of lactic acidosis were reported. The mean post-procedural drop in eGFR was 6.81mL/min/1.73m2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.41 to 10.21) in the presence of metformin and 5.34 mL/min/1.73m2 (95% CI: 2.98 to 7.70) in its absence. The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was not affected by concurrent metformin, as shown by a (between-groups) standardized mean difference of 0.0007 (95% CI: -0.1007 to 0.1022).Conclusion: Concurrent metformin during percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with relatively preserved renal function is safe, without added risk of lactic acidosis or contrast-induced nephropathy. Thus, emergency revascularization in the context of acute coronary syndromes should not be deferred. More data from clinical trials in patients with severe renal disease are needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并发二甲双胍治疗后的肾脏并发症:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:糖尿病患者常用二甲双胍可引起乳酸性酸中毒。虽然这种副作用通常很少见,但由于造影剂诱发肾病的风险,在需要造影剂的手术中,这种副作用仍然是一个值得关注的问题。通常在围手术期暂时停用二甲双胍,但在紧急情况下,如急性冠状动脉综合征,临床决定是困难的。在这篇荟萃分析的系统综述中,我们旨在进一步研究同时接受二甲双胍治疗的患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性。设计、环境和参与者:我们分析了接受(选择性或紧急)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(同时或不同时给予二甲双胍)的患者的研究,报告了二甲双胍相关乳酸酸中毒和围手术期肾功能的发生率。方法:在2022年8月无语言限制的情况下,系统检索PubMed、ClinicalTrials.gov、Cochrane Library和Scopus。随机临床试验和观察性研究分别用修订后的Cochrane协作偏倚风险工具和Newcastle-Ottawa质量量表进行评估。数据综合处理了估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)的平均下降和造影剂肾病的发生率,以及乳酸性酸中毒。结果:纳入9项研究,共计2235例患者(其中1076例患者在围术期持续使用二甲双胍),eGFR大多在30 mL/min/1.73m2以上,无乳酸性酸中毒报告。二甲双胍存在时,术后eGFR平均下降6.81mL/min/1.73m2(95%可信区间[CI]: 3.41 ~ 10.21),未使用二甲双胍时,术后eGFR平均下降5.34 mL/min/1.73m2 (95% CI: 2.98 ~ 7.70)。对比剂肾病的发生率不受同时使用二甲双胍的影响,(组间)标准化平均差异为0.0007 (95% CI: -0.1007至0.1022)。结论:肾功能相对保存的患者在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间同时服用二甲双胍是安全的,不会增加乳酸酸中毒或造影剂肾病的风险。因此,急诊血运重建术在急性冠脉综合征的情况下不应推迟。需要更多重症肾病患者的临床试验数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Medicine & Research
Clinical Medicine & Research MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Clinical Medicine & Research is a peer reviewed publication of original scientific medical research that is relevant to a broad audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Articles are published quarterly in the following topics: -Medicine -Clinical Research -Evidence-based Medicine -Preventive Medicine -Translational Medicine -Rural Health -Case Reports -Epidemiology -Basic science -History of Medicine -The Art of Medicine -Non-Clinical Aspects of Medicine & Science
期刊最新文献
Crafting the Future Doctor: Mentorship in the First Year of Medical School. Diagnostic Accuracy of AI Algorithms in Aortic Stenosis Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Extensive Invasive Sinusitis Secondary to Streptococcus Intermedius Infection. Long COVID or Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) in Children and Adolescents. Potential Application of Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide (Anti-CCP) for the Diagnosis of Periodontal Disease in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis with Cut-Off Determination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1