Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Analysis of Products of Conception in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss for specific anomalies detected by USG.

Kinjal Gajjar, Alpesh Patel, Bhikhabhai Patel, Shiva Chettiar, Devendrasinh Jhala
{"title":"Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Analysis of Products of Conception in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss for specific anomalies detected by USG.","authors":"Kinjal Gajjar,&nbsp;Alpesh Patel,&nbsp;Bhikhabhai Patel,&nbsp;Shiva Chettiar,&nbsp;Devendrasinh Jhala","doi":"10.1530/RAF-22-0092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the proportion of chromosomal abnormalities in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) assisted by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) bright out with higher detection rate, more accuracy, and less sample failure as compared with conventional cytogenetic analysis. In this study, product of conception samples with abnormal USG findings of the fetus and clinical history of RPL were first processed for karyotyping and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization analysis. Normal results given by Karyotype and FISH samples with major anomalies detected by Ultrasound with RPL were divided into six groups and aCGH was performed to detect the gain or loss and copy number variations (CNVs) of a particular gene present in chromosomal segments. Among a total of 300 POC samples, 100 abnormal samples were identified either by karyotype (n=70) or by FISH (n=30). From the remaining 200 samples, 5 showed the presence of maternal cell contamination excluded. aCGH analysis revealed (n=195) that 74 (38%) samples with copy number variations (CNVs) and two samples with variants of unknown clinical significance (VOUS) were clinically associated with the clinical findings and 121(62%) samples showed no change in CNVs. The most frequent CNVs were loss of chromosome regions at 2q33.1, 7q11.21, 15q11.1, 16p11.2, Xp22.33, and Yp11.32. CNVs at arr[GRCh37]7p22.3,p21.2(830852-15124702)×1,7q34q36.3(141464180_158909738)×3, 14.2Mbp deletion of 7p22.3p21.2 (SUN1 gene) and 17.4Mbp duplication of 7q34q36.3 (KCNH2, CNTNAP2, and SHH genes) in one sample, CNVs at arr[GRCh37]8p22.2q22.3 (86326349_105509986)×1, 2.48Mbp deletion of 8p22.2q22.3 (GRHL1 gene) were found in another sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":21128,"journal":{"name":"Reproduction & Fertility","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fc/90/RAF-22-0092.PMC10160560.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproduction & Fertility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/RAF-22-0092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

To evaluate the proportion of chromosomal abnormalities in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) assisted by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) bright out with higher detection rate, more accuracy, and less sample failure as compared with conventional cytogenetic analysis. In this study, product of conception samples with abnormal USG findings of the fetus and clinical history of RPL were first processed for karyotyping and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization analysis. Normal results given by Karyotype and FISH samples with major anomalies detected by Ultrasound with RPL were divided into six groups and aCGH was performed to detect the gain or loss and copy number variations (CNVs) of a particular gene present in chromosomal segments. Among a total of 300 POC samples, 100 abnormal samples were identified either by karyotype (n=70) or by FISH (n=30). From the remaining 200 samples, 5 showed the presence of maternal cell contamination excluded. aCGH analysis revealed (n=195) that 74 (38%) samples with copy number variations (CNVs) and two samples with variants of unknown clinical significance (VOUS) were clinically associated with the clinical findings and 121(62%) samples showed no change in CNVs. The most frequent CNVs were loss of chromosome regions at 2q33.1, 7q11.21, 15q11.1, 16p11.2, Xp22.33, and Yp11.32. CNVs at arr[GRCh37]7p22.3,p21.2(830852-15124702)×1,7q34q36.3(141464180_158909738)×3, 14.2Mbp deletion of 7p22.3p21.2 (SUN1 gene) and 17.4Mbp duplication of 7q34q36.3 (KCNH2, CNTNAP2, and SHH genes) in one sample, CNVs at arr[GRCh37]8p22.2q22.3 (86326349_105509986)×1, 2.48Mbp deletion of 8p22.2q22.3 (GRHL1 gene) were found in another sample.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阵列比较基因组杂交分析复发性妊娠丢失的受精卵对USG检测到的特定异常。
目的:评估阵列比较基因组杂交(aCGH)辅助染色体异常在复发性妊娠丢失(RPL)中的比例,与传统的细胞遗传学分析相比,该方法具有更高的检出率、更高的准确性和更少的样本失败率。在本研究中,首先对胎儿USG异常和RPL临床史的受孕样品进行核型分析和荧光原位杂交分析。将核型和FISH样本的正常结果与超声RPL检测的主要异常分为六组,并进行aCGH检测染色体片段中特定基因的增减和拷贝数变异(CNVs)。在总共300份POC样本中,通过核型(n=70)或FISH (n=30)鉴定出100份异常样本。在剩下的200个样本中,有5个显示排除了母体细胞污染的存在。aCGH分析显示(n=195) 74例(38%)拷贝数变异(CNVs)和2例临床意义未知变异(VOUS)与临床表现相关,121例(62%)拷贝数变异无变化。最常见的CNVs是2q33.1、7q11.21、15q11.1、16p11.2、Xp22.33和Yp11.32染色体区域的缺失。在一个样本中发现arr[GRCh37]7p22.3、p21.2(83082 -15124702)×1、7q34q36.3(141464180_158909738)×3位点的CNVs, 7p22.3p21.2 (SUN1基因)14.2Mbp的缺失和7q34q36.3(KCNH2、CNTNAP2和SHH基因)17.4Mbp的重复,在另一个样本中发现arr[GRCh37]8p22.2q22.3 (86326349_105509986)×1位点的CNVs, 8p22.2q22.3 (GRHL1基因)2.48Mbp的缺失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The (cost-) effectiveness Of Surgical excision of Colorectal endometriosis compared to ART treatment trAjectory (TOSCA study) - a study protocol. Quality of fresh and cryopreserved bovine sperm is reduced by BPA and BPF exposure. Presence of KREMEN receptors for DKK1 in the preimplantation bovine embryo. Role of oxidative stress in male infertility. Impact of vitamin B12 on the reproductive health of women with sickle cell disease: a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1