Aluminum Leaching from Fluid Warmers: Regulatory Deferral to Clinicians' Decision.

Marko Oydanich, Rotem Naftalovich, Patrick J Discepola, Jim Doran, Faraz A Chaudhry, Daniel J Eloy
{"title":"Aluminum Leaching from Fluid Warmers: Regulatory Deferral to Clinicians' Decision.","authors":"Marko Oydanich,&nbsp;Rotem Naftalovich,&nbsp;Patrick J Discepola,&nbsp;Jim Doran,&nbsp;Faraz A Chaudhry,&nbsp;Daniel J Eloy","doi":"10.2345/1943-5967-56.2.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fluid-warming systems are crucial in surgical and trauma settings because of their key role in preventing or treating hypothermia and enabling proper resuscitation of blood products that are stored cold. Recently, several manufacturers have issued warnings of the possibility of aluminum leaching from their fluid warmers and cautioned about the potential for aluminum toxicity in patients who underwent fluid resuscitation with these devices. Studies suggest that one of the main factors affecting aluminum leaching in this setting is the coating of the aluminum plate itself. Coating, often with a biocompatible material, appears to reduce aluminum leaching by 100- to 200-fold compared with an uncoated plate. Nonetheless, leaching with the coating is still at a level exceeding U.S. regulations. A few aluminum-free warming systems are available on the market, but these are not carried by all providers and some clinicians may be less familiar with their use. Medical device manufacturers will likely design future warming systems with less potential for aluminum blood contact. In the meantime, the risk of inadequate resuscitation, consequent to the proper fluid warmer no longer being available, is contrasted with the risk of potential toxicity. In the situation described here, the regulators deferred the ultimate decision of which fluid warmer to use in a given situation to the risk-benefit decision of the clinician.</p>","PeriodicalId":35656,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9767429/pdf/i1943-5967-56-2-37.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2345/1943-5967-56.2.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fluid-warming systems are crucial in surgical and trauma settings because of their key role in preventing or treating hypothermia and enabling proper resuscitation of blood products that are stored cold. Recently, several manufacturers have issued warnings of the possibility of aluminum leaching from their fluid warmers and cautioned about the potential for aluminum toxicity in patients who underwent fluid resuscitation with these devices. Studies suggest that one of the main factors affecting aluminum leaching in this setting is the coating of the aluminum plate itself. Coating, often with a biocompatible material, appears to reduce aluminum leaching by 100- to 200-fold compared with an uncoated plate. Nonetheless, leaching with the coating is still at a level exceeding U.S. regulations. A few aluminum-free warming systems are available on the market, but these are not carried by all providers and some clinicians may be less familiar with their use. Medical device manufacturers will likely design future warming systems with less potential for aluminum blood contact. In the meantime, the risk of inadequate resuscitation, consequent to the proper fluid warmer no longer being available, is contrasted with the risk of potential toxicity. In the situation described here, the regulators deferred the ultimate decision of which fluid warmer to use in a given situation to the risk-benefit decision of the clinician.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从液体加热器的铝浸出:延迟到临床医生的决定。
液体加热系统在外科和创伤环境中至关重要,因为它们在预防或治疗体温过低以及使低温储存的血液制品能够适当复苏方面发挥着关键作用。最近,一些制造商已经发出警告,他们的液体加热器可能会浸出铝,并警告使用这些设备进行液体复苏的患者可能会产生铝毒性。研究表明,在这种情况下,影响铝浸出的主要因素之一是铝板本身的涂层。涂层通常采用生物相容性材料,与未涂层板相比,似乎可以减少铝浸出100至200倍。尽管如此,这种涂层的浸出程度仍然超过了美国的规定。市场上有一些无铝加热系统,但并不是所有的供应商都有,一些临床医生可能对它们的使用不太熟悉。医疗设备制造商可能会设计未来的加热系统,减少铝血液接触的可能性。与此同时,由于不再有适当的液体加热器,复苏不足的风险与潜在的毒性风险形成对比。在这里描述的情况下,监管机构将在给定情况下使用哪种液体加热器的最终决定推迟给临床医生的风险-收益决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology
Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: AAMI publishes Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology (BI&T) a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the developers, managers, and users of medical instrumentation and technology.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Gamma and X-ray Irradiation on Polymers Commonly Used in Healthcare Products. Effect of Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide and Nitrogen Dioxide Sterilization on Nitinol. Toward Enhanced Machine-Based Release in X-ray Sterilization. Beyond Endoscopes: Pilot Study of Surgical Instrument Lumen Inspection. Advantages and Limitations of Physical and Virtual Dose Mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1