Hybrid Concept Analysis: Peer Collaborative Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Simulation.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Nursing Education Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.3928/01484834-20230306-06
Thye Peng Ngo, Roxie Barnes, Deanna Reising
{"title":"Hybrid Concept Analysis: Peer Collaborative Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Simulation.","authors":"Thye Peng Ngo,&nbsp;Roxie Barnes,&nbsp;Deanna Reising","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20230306-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nursing students collaborate and make clinical decisions in simulation scenarios. However, the literature does not clearly define the concept of peer collaborative clinical decision-making (PCCDM). This hybrid concept analysis explored and established the definition of PCCDM among nursing students in simulation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 19 articles were reviewed, and 11 dyads of nursing students were interviewed after participating in virtual reality simulation for their perspectives on PCCDM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five major themes were identified: group (1) communication; (2) awareness; (3) regulation; (4) reasoning; and (5) emotion. The conceptual definition of PCCDM is a dynamic, nonhierarchical, and group-level process of cognitive and socioemotional interactions among peers about a clinical situation that involves group communication, awareness, and regulation of reasoning and emotion within the collaborative space.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This analysis provides a conceptual definition of PCCDM in nursing simulation as well as a pathway for developing a theoretical framework and instrument. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2023;62(5):269-277.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":54781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Education","volume":"62 5","pages":"269-277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20230306-06","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nursing students collaborate and make clinical decisions in simulation scenarios. However, the literature does not clearly define the concept of peer collaborative clinical decision-making (PCCDM). This hybrid concept analysis explored and established the definition of PCCDM among nursing students in simulation.

Method: A total of 19 articles were reviewed, and 11 dyads of nursing students were interviewed after participating in virtual reality simulation for their perspectives on PCCDM.

Results: Five major themes were identified: group (1) communication; (2) awareness; (3) regulation; (4) reasoning; and (5) emotion. The conceptual definition of PCCDM is a dynamic, nonhierarchical, and group-level process of cognitive and socioemotional interactions among peers about a clinical situation that involves group communication, awareness, and regulation of reasoning and emotion within the collaborative space.

Conclusion: This analysis provides a conceptual definition of PCCDM in nursing simulation as well as a pathway for developing a theoretical framework and instrument. [J Nurs Educ. 2023;62(5):269-277.].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合概念分析:护理模拟中的同伴协同临床决策。
背景:护理学生在模拟场景中合作并做出临床决策。然而,文献并没有明确定义同伴协作临床决策(PCCDM)的概念。通过混合概念分析,探索并建立了模拟护理生PCCDM的定义。方法:回顾19篇文献,通过虚拟现实模拟对11对护生进行访谈,了解他们对PCCDM的看法。结果:确定了五大主题:群体(1)传播;(2)意识;(3)监管;(4)推理;(5)情感。PCCDM的概念定义是一个动态的、非分层的、群体层面的过程,同伴之间关于临床情况的认知和社会情感互动,涉及协作空间内的群体沟通、意识和推理和情感调节。结论:本分析提供了PCCDM在护理模拟中的概念定义,并为开发理论框架和工具提供了途径。[J].中国生物医学工程学报,2009;32(5):559 - 557。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Education is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles and new ideas for nurse educators in various types and levels of nursing programs for over 50 years. The Journal enhances the teaching-learning process, promotes curriculum development, and stimulates creative innovation and research in nursing education.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of the Power of NursingTM on Classroom Connectedness. Unveiling the SChematic Organization of Pharmacological Information for Nurses: A New Approach to Pharmacology Education for Nurses. Simulation Experiences Focusing on Addressing Culturally Based Hidden Bias and RacisM (A-CHARM). Simulation Expert Modeling to Teach Sensitive Screening in Nursing Education. Incorporating Social Needs Screening in Simulation for Family Nurse Practitioner Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1