Radiographic Evaluation of First Tarsometatarsal Joint Arthrodesis for Hallux Valgus Deformity: Does the Fusion of the First to the Second Metatarsal Base Reduce the Radiological Recurrence Rate?

Foot & ankle specialist Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-06 DOI:10.1177/19386400231164209
Christian B Scheele, Christian Kinast, Florian Lenze, Julia Wimmer, Simone Beischl, Norbert Harrasser
{"title":"Radiographic Evaluation of First Tarsometatarsal Joint Arthrodesis for Hallux Valgus Deformity: Does the Fusion of the First to the Second Metatarsal Base Reduce the Radiological Recurrence Rate?","authors":"Christian B Scheele, Christian Kinast, Florian Lenze, Julia Wimmer, Simone Beischl, Norbert Harrasser","doi":"10.1177/19386400231164209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Modified Lapidus arthrodesis (MLA) is a well-established treatment option for symptomatic hallux valgus deformity (HVD). However, recurrence of the deformity remains a concern. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of an additional intermetatarsal fusion on the radiographic recurrence rate after first tarsometatarsal (TMT-I) arthrodesis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective evaluation of 56 feet that underwent TMT-I arthrodesis for moderate to severe HVD. Twenty-three feet received an isolated arthrodesis of the TMT-I joint (TMT-I), whereas 33 feet received an additional fusion between the base of the first and the second metatarsal bone (TMT-I/II). Various radiological parameters were determined preoperatively, 6 weeks and at a mean of 2 years postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intermetatarsal angle (IMA) and the hallux valgus angle (HVA) were significantly lowered at both follow-up evaluations in both groups. In the TMT-I/II group, the initial reduction of HVA was significantly higher (29.3° vs 21.1°). This difference disappeared by the second follow-up, leaving no significant differences between both techniques at final follow-up. Radiological recurrence rates of HVD were comparable in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Isolated TMT-I arthrodesis provides reliable radiological results in the correction of HVD. Whether additional fusion of the first and second metatarsal base should be routinely performed remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Levels of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"382-390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11408979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400231164209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Modified Lapidus arthrodesis (MLA) is a well-established treatment option for symptomatic hallux valgus deformity (HVD). However, recurrence of the deformity remains a concern. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of an additional intermetatarsal fusion on the radiographic recurrence rate after first tarsometatarsal (TMT-I) arthrodesis.

Methods: This is a retrospective evaluation of 56 feet that underwent TMT-I arthrodesis for moderate to severe HVD. Twenty-three feet received an isolated arthrodesis of the TMT-I joint (TMT-I), whereas 33 feet received an additional fusion between the base of the first and the second metatarsal bone (TMT-I/II). Various radiological parameters were determined preoperatively, 6 weeks and at a mean of 2 years postoperatively.

Results: The intermetatarsal angle (IMA) and the hallux valgus angle (HVA) were significantly lowered at both follow-up evaluations in both groups. In the TMT-I/II group, the initial reduction of HVA was significantly higher (29.3° vs 21.1°). This difference disappeared by the second follow-up, leaving no significant differences between both techniques at final follow-up. Radiological recurrence rates of HVD were comparable in both groups.

Conclusions: Isolated TMT-I arthrodesis provides reliable radiological results in the correction of HVD. Whether additional fusion of the first and second metatarsal base should be routinely performed remains unclear.

Levels of evidence: Level 3.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第一跖跗关节关节置换术治疗拇指外翻畸形的放射学评估:第一跖骨基底与第二跖骨基底的融合能否降低放射学复发率?
背景:改良Lapidus关节固定术(MLA)是治疗有症状的拇指外翻畸形(HVD)的一种行之有效的方法。然而,畸形复发仍是一个令人担忧的问题。本研究旨在评估第一跖骨(TMT-I)关节置换术后附加跖间融合术对影像学复发率的影响:这是一项回顾性评估,对象是因中度至重度HVD而接受TMT-I关节置换术的56只足。23只脚接受了孤立的TMT-I关节融合术(TMT-I),33只脚接受了第一和第二跖骨基底之间的额外融合术(TMT-I/II)。对术前、术后 6 周和术后平均 2 年的各种放射学参数进行了测定:结果:在两次随访评估中,两组患者的跖骨间角度(IMA)和拇指外翻角度(HVA)均明显降低。在 TMT-I/II 组中,HVA 的初始降低幅度明显更高(29.3° vs 21.1°)。这一差异在第二次随访时消失,两种技术在最终随访时无明显差异。两组的HVD放射学复发率相当:结论:孤立的TMT-I关节置换术在矫正HVD方面具有可靠的放射学效果。结论:单独的TMT-I关节固定术在矫正HVD方面具有可靠的放射学效果,但是否应常规进行第一和第二跖骨基底部的额外融合仍不清楚:3级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes for First Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis Using an Intramedullary Nail for Hallux Valgus Deformity A Consecutive Case Series. Survey of Utilization of Weightbearing Computed Tomography Within AOFAS Membership. Association Between Pronation External Rotation IV Fracture Pattern and Regional Bone Density. The Wait Time for Surgery Following Injury Affects Functional Outcomes and Complications After an Ankle Fracture: A Propensity Score-Matched Multicenter Study, the TRON Study. Defining Operative Indications in Lisfranc Injuries: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1