Quality of Life in People With Subjective Cognitive Decline.

IF 1.3 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Alpha psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2023.221007
Alexandru Pavel, Radu Paun, Valentin Matei, Alina Rosca, Catalina Tudose
{"title":"Quality of Life in People With Subjective Cognitive Decline.","authors":"Alexandru Pavel,&nbsp;Radu Paun,&nbsp;Valentin Matei,&nbsp;Alina Rosca,&nbsp;Catalina Tudose","doi":"10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2023.221007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Quality of life is extensively studied in older persons, but there are few studies that investigate it in people with subjective cognitive decline. Our aim was to evaluate the quality of life in a Romanian sample of individuals with subjective cognitive decline compared to controls while accounting for different possible moderators. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the quality of life in a Romanian subjective cognitive decline sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational study to evaluate differences in the quality of life between subjective cognitive decline and controls. Participants were evaluated for subjective cognitive decline according to Jessen et al. We collected sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and information about physical activity. Quality of life was evaluated using the Short Form-36 questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 101 participants included in the analysis with 66.33% (n = 67) in the subjective cognitive decline group. There were no differences between the social, demographic, and clinical characteristics of the individuals. The subjective cognitive decline group had a higher score on the negative emotion trait of Big Five. Individuals with subjective cognitive decline reported poorer physical functioning (<i>P</i> = .034), more role limitations due to physical health (<i>P</i> = .010) and emotional problems (<i>P</i> = .019), and less energy (<i>P</i> = .018) compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Persons with subjective cognitive decline reported diminished quality of life compared to controls and differences were not explained by other sociodemographic and clinical characteristics evaluated. This area could prove to be an important target for nonpharmacological interventions in the subjective cognitive decline group.</p>","PeriodicalId":72151,"journal":{"name":"Alpha psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c4/26/ap-24-2-60.PMC10151925.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alpha psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2023.221007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Quality of life is extensively studied in older persons, but there are few studies that investigate it in people with subjective cognitive decline. Our aim was to evaluate the quality of life in a Romanian sample of individuals with subjective cognitive decline compared to controls while accounting for different possible moderators. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the quality of life in a Romanian subjective cognitive decline sample.

Methods: We conducted an observational study to evaluate differences in the quality of life between subjective cognitive decline and controls. Participants were evaluated for subjective cognitive decline according to Jessen et al. We collected sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and information about physical activity. Quality of life was evaluated using the Short Form-36 questionnaire.

Results: There were 101 participants included in the analysis with 66.33% (n = 67) in the subjective cognitive decline group. There were no differences between the social, demographic, and clinical characteristics of the individuals. The subjective cognitive decline group had a higher score on the negative emotion trait of Big Five. Individuals with subjective cognitive decline reported poorer physical functioning (P = .034), more role limitations due to physical health (P = .010) and emotional problems (P = .019), and less energy (P = .018) compared to the control group.

Conclusion: Persons with subjective cognitive decline reported diminished quality of life compared to controls and differences were not explained by other sociodemographic and clinical characteristics evaluated. This area could prove to be an important target for nonpharmacological interventions in the subjective cognitive decline group.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主观认知衰退患者的生活质量。
目的:老年人的生活质量被广泛研究,但很少有研究调查主观认知能力下降的人的生活质量。我们的目的是在考虑不同可能的调节因素的同时,评估罗马尼亚主观认知能力下降的个体样本的生活质量。据我们所知,这是第一个评估罗马尼亚主观认知衰退样本的生活质量的研究。方法:我们进行了一项观察性研究,以评估主观认知能力下降与对照组之间生活质量的差异。根据Jessen等人的研究,对参与者进行主观认知能力下降的评估。我们收集了社会人口学和临床特征以及有关体育活动的信息。使用Short Form-36问卷对生活质量进行评估。结果:101例纳入分析,其中主观认知能力下降组占66.33% (n = 67)。个体的社会、人口统计学和临床特征之间没有差异。主观认知能力下降组在大五负面情绪特征上得分较高。与对照组相比,主观认知能力下降的个体报告的身体功能较差(P = 0.034),身体健康(P = 0.010)和情绪问题(P = 0.019)导致的角色限制更多,精力不足(P = 0.018)。结论:与对照组相比,主观认知能力下降的患者报告的生活质量下降,而其他社会人口学和临床特征评估无法解释差异。这一领域可能被证明是主观认知衰退组非药物干预的重要目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anti-obesity Drugs for the Treatment of Binge Eating Disorder: Opportunities and Challenges. A Meta-analysis of Predicting Disorders of Consciousness After Traumatic Brain Injury by Machine Learning Models. Analysis of Influencing Factors of Major Depression After Spinal Cord Injury. Analysis of Intestinal Microbiota in Schizophrenic Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Attachment Style Modifies the Effect of Spousal Support on Postpartum Depression in Women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1