Optimal cutoff value of carotid stump pressure for determining the need for a carotid shunt in carotid artery endarterectomy.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Vascular Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-06 DOI:10.1177/17085381231174703
Tolga Demir, Nilufer Bektas, Begum O Kasapoglu, Sultan Acar Sevinc, Nermin Balta Basi, Fatih Ozcelik, Ulgen Yalaz Tekan, Ismail Koramaz
{"title":"Optimal cutoff value of carotid stump pressure for determining the need for a carotid shunt in carotid artery endarterectomy.","authors":"Tolga Demir, Nilufer Bektas, Begum O Kasapoglu, Sultan Acar Sevinc, Nermin Balta Basi, Fatih Ozcelik, Ulgen Yalaz Tekan, Ismail Koramaz","doi":"10.1177/17085381231174703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was conducted to identify the diagnostic value of carotid stump pressure for determining the need for a carotid artery shunt in patients undergoing carotid artery endarterectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Carotid stump pressure was prospectively measured in all carotid artery endarterectomies performed under local anesthesia between January 2020 and April 2022. The shunt was selectively used when neurological symptoms appeared after carotid cross-clamping. Carotid stump pressure was compared between patients who needed shunting and those who did not. Demographic and clinical characteristics, hematological and biochemical parameters, and carotid stump pressure of the patients with and without shunts were statistically compared. To determine the optimal cutoff value and diagnostic performance of carotid stump pressure for identifying the patients who need a shunt, receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 102 patients (61 men and 41 women) who underwent carotid artery endarterectomy under local anesthesia were included, with an age range of 51-88 years. A carotid artery shunt was used in 16 (8 men and 8 women) patients. The carotid stump pressure values of the patients with a shunt were lower than those without a shunt (median (min-max): 42 (20-55) vs 51 (20-104), <i>p</i> < 0.0006). In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis performed to determine the need for a shunt, the optimal cutoff value of carotid stump pressure was ≤48 mmHg, sensitivity was 93.8%, and specificity was 61.6% (area under the curve: 0.773, <i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Carotid stump pressure has sufficient diagnostic power to determine the need for a shunt, but it cannot be used alone in the clinical setting. Instead, it can be used in combination with other neurological monitoring methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"1036-1043"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381231174703","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to identify the diagnostic value of carotid stump pressure for determining the need for a carotid artery shunt in patients undergoing carotid artery endarterectomy.

Materials and methods: Carotid stump pressure was prospectively measured in all carotid artery endarterectomies performed under local anesthesia between January 2020 and April 2022. The shunt was selectively used when neurological symptoms appeared after carotid cross-clamping. Carotid stump pressure was compared between patients who needed shunting and those who did not. Demographic and clinical characteristics, hematological and biochemical parameters, and carotid stump pressure of the patients with and without shunts were statistically compared. To determine the optimal cutoff value and diagnostic performance of carotid stump pressure for identifying the patients who need a shunt, receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed.

Results: Overall, 102 patients (61 men and 41 women) who underwent carotid artery endarterectomy under local anesthesia were included, with an age range of 51-88 years. A carotid artery shunt was used in 16 (8 men and 8 women) patients. The carotid stump pressure values of the patients with a shunt were lower than those without a shunt (median (min-max): 42 (20-55) vs 51 (20-104), p < 0.0006). In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis performed to determine the need for a shunt, the optimal cutoff value of carotid stump pressure was ≤48 mmHg, sensitivity was 93.8%, and specificity was 61.6% (area under the curve: 0.773, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Carotid stump pressure has sufficient diagnostic power to determine the need for a shunt, but it cannot be used alone in the clinical setting. Instead, it can be used in combination with other neurological monitoring methods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定颈动脉内膜剥脱术中是否需要颈动脉分流术的颈动脉残端压力最佳临界值。
研究目的本研究旨在确定颈动脉残端压力在确定接受颈动脉内膜剥脱术患者是否需要进行颈动脉分流术方面的诊断价值:对2020年1月至2022年4月期间在局部麻醉下进行的所有颈动脉内膜剥脱术的颈动脉残端压力进行了前瞻性测量。当颈动脉交叉钳夹术后出现神经症状时,选择性地使用分流术。对需要分流和不需要分流的患者颈动脉残端压力进行了比较。对需要分流和不需要分流的患者的人口统计学和临床特征、血液学和生化指标以及颈动脉残端压力进行了统计比较。为了确定颈动脉残端压力的最佳临界值和诊断性能,对需要分流的患者进行了接收器操作特征分析:共纳入102名在局部麻醉下接受颈动脉内膜剥脱术的患者(61名男性和41名女性),年龄范围为51-88岁。16名患者(8男8女)使用了颈动脉分流术。采用分流术的患者颈动脉残端压力值低于未采用分流术的患者(中位数(最小值-最大值):42(20-55)vs 51(20-55)):42 (20-55) vs 51 (20-104),P < 0.0006)。在为确定是否需要分流而进行的接收器操作特征曲线分析中,颈动脉残端压力的最佳临界值为≤48 mmHg,敏感性为93.8%,特异性为61.6%(曲线下面积:0.773,P<0.0001):结论:颈动脉残端压力具有足够的诊断能力来确定是否需要分流,但在临床环境中不能单独使用。结论:颈动脉残端压力具有足够的诊断能力来确定是否需要分流,但在临床环境中不能单独使用,而应与其他神经监测方法结合使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular
Vascular 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of prophylactic fasciotomy in patients with non-traumatic acute limb ischemia. Long-term outcomes of carotid endarterectomy with eversion technique in patients with an open circle of Willis: A multicenter registry study. Intercostal bypass graft pseudoaneurysm repaired with percutaneous glue embolization utilizing CT needle guidance: A case report. A novel non-pneumatic compression device results in reduced foot and ankle swelling in patients with venous and lymphatic edema. Reliability of a portable toe pressure photoplethysmography device compared to a stationary laser doppler flowmeter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1