[Determination of 18 caine anesthetics in animal meat using solid phase extraction combined with ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry].

IF 1.2 4区 化学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL 色谱 Pub Date : 2023-05-08 DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1123.2022.08019
Shao-Ming Wu, Li-Qun Ouyang, Peng Meng, Meng-Hang He, Qin Lin, Yan-Kai Chen, Wen-Jing Liu, Xiao-Ming Su, Ming Dai
{"title":"[Determination of 18 caine anesthetics in animal meat using solid phase extraction combined with ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry].","authors":"Shao-Ming Wu,&nbsp;Li-Qun Ouyang,&nbsp;Peng Meng,&nbsp;Meng-Hang He,&nbsp;Qin Lin,&nbsp;Yan-Kai Chen,&nbsp;Wen-Jing Liu,&nbsp;Xiao-Ming Su,&nbsp;Ming Dai","doi":"10.3724/SP.J.1123.2022.08019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Because of the widespread application of anesthetic drugs in the fields of animal breeding and transportation, demand for the rapid, sensitive detection of anesthetic drugs in animal meat is increasing. The complex animal meat matrix contains various interfering substances, such as proteins, fats, and phospholipids, along with anesthetic drug residues at very low concentrations. Therefore, adopting appropriate pretreatment methods is necessary to improve the sensitivity of detection. In this study, a rapid, accurate analytical method based on ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) and solid phase extraction (SPE) was established to determine the contents of 18 caines in animal meat. The MS parameters, such as the collision energies of 18 caines, were optimized. Furthermore, the chromatographic separation conditions and response intensities of the caine in different mobile phases were compared. The effects of different pretreatment conditions on the extraction efficiencies of the 18 caines in meat samples and those of different purification conditions, such as extraction solvent, SPE column, and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) dosage, on their recoveries were investigated. Combined with the external standard method, the 18 caines in meat were successfully quantified. Sample pretreatment is a three-step process. First, in ultrasound-assisted extraction, 2.0 g samples were added to 2.0 mL water and extracted using 10 mL 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in acetonitrile under ultrasound conditions for 10 min. SPE was then performed using an Oasis PRIME HLB column. Finally, DMSO-assisted concentration was employed: the organic layer was collected and dried at 40 ℃ under a stream of N<sub>2</sub> gas with the addition of 100 μL DMSO. Acetonitrile-water (1∶9, v/v) was added to the residue to yield a final volume of 1.0 mL for use in UPLC-MS/MS. The 18 caines were separated using an HSS T<sub>3</sub> (100 mm×2.1 mm, 1.8 μm) column with 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water (containing 0.02 mmol/L ammonium acetate) and methanol as mobile phases. Samples were detected using an electrospray ion source (ESI) in the positive ion and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) modes during UPLC-MS/MS. Under the optimized conditions, the 18 target caine anesthetics displayed good linearities in the range of 1.00-50.0 μg/L, and the correlation coefficients (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) were >0.999. The respective limits of detection (LODs) and quantification (LOQs) were 0.2-0.5 μg/kg, and 0.6-1.5 μg/kg. In pork, beef, and mutton samples, the recoveries obtained at three spiked levels were 83.4%-100.4% with relative standard deviations (RSDs) of 3.1%-8.5%. This simple, rapid, sensitive method may be applied in the detection of 18 caine anesthetics in animal meat and may provide technical support to the food safety department in China in monitoring the residues of caine anesthetics in animal meat.</p>","PeriodicalId":9864,"journal":{"name":"色谱","volume":"41 5","pages":"434-442"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10122766/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"色谱","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2022.08019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Because of the widespread application of anesthetic drugs in the fields of animal breeding and transportation, demand for the rapid, sensitive detection of anesthetic drugs in animal meat is increasing. The complex animal meat matrix contains various interfering substances, such as proteins, fats, and phospholipids, along with anesthetic drug residues at very low concentrations. Therefore, adopting appropriate pretreatment methods is necessary to improve the sensitivity of detection. In this study, a rapid, accurate analytical method based on ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) and solid phase extraction (SPE) was established to determine the contents of 18 caines in animal meat. The MS parameters, such as the collision energies of 18 caines, were optimized. Furthermore, the chromatographic separation conditions and response intensities of the caine in different mobile phases were compared. The effects of different pretreatment conditions on the extraction efficiencies of the 18 caines in meat samples and those of different purification conditions, such as extraction solvent, SPE column, and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) dosage, on their recoveries were investigated. Combined with the external standard method, the 18 caines in meat were successfully quantified. Sample pretreatment is a three-step process. First, in ultrasound-assisted extraction, 2.0 g samples were added to 2.0 mL water and extracted using 10 mL 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in acetonitrile under ultrasound conditions for 10 min. SPE was then performed using an Oasis PRIME HLB column. Finally, DMSO-assisted concentration was employed: the organic layer was collected and dried at 40 ℃ under a stream of N2 gas with the addition of 100 μL DMSO. Acetonitrile-water (1∶9, v/v) was added to the residue to yield a final volume of 1.0 mL for use in UPLC-MS/MS. The 18 caines were separated using an HSS T3 (100 mm×2.1 mm, 1.8 μm) column with 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water (containing 0.02 mmol/L ammonium acetate) and methanol as mobile phases. Samples were detected using an electrospray ion source (ESI) in the positive ion and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) modes during UPLC-MS/MS. Under the optimized conditions, the 18 target caine anesthetics displayed good linearities in the range of 1.00-50.0 μg/L, and the correlation coefficients (R2) were >0.999. The respective limits of detection (LODs) and quantification (LOQs) were 0.2-0.5 μg/kg, and 0.6-1.5 μg/kg. In pork, beef, and mutton samples, the recoveries obtained at three spiked levels were 83.4%-100.4% with relative standard deviations (RSDs) of 3.1%-8.5%. This simple, rapid, sensitive method may be applied in the detection of 18 caine anesthetics in animal meat and may provide technical support to the food safety department in China in monitoring the residues of caine anesthetics in animal meat.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[固相萃取-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定动物肉中18种卡因麻醉药]。
由于麻醉药物在动物养殖和运输领域的广泛应用,对快速、灵敏地检测动物肉中麻醉药物的需求日益增加。复杂的动物肉类基质含有各种干扰物质,如蛋白质、脂肪和磷脂,以及非常低浓度的麻醉药物残留物。因此,采用合适的预处理方法是提高检测灵敏度的必要条件。本研究建立了一种基于超高效液相色谱-串联质谱(UPLC-MS/MS)和固相萃取(SPE)的快速、准确的分析方法,用于测定动物肉中18种狗的含量。对18条链的碰撞能量等质谱参数进行了优化。并比较了不同流动相的色谱分离条件和响应强度。考察了不同预处理条件对肉类样品中18种植物提取物提取率的影响,以及提取溶剂、固相萃取柱、二甲基亚砜(DMSO)用量等不同纯化条件对其回收率的影响。结合外标法,成功地对肉中的18种犬进行了定量分析。样品预处理分为三个步骤。首先,在超声辅助提取中,将2.0 g样品加入2.0 mL水中,用10 mL 0.1% (v/v)甲酸在乙腈中超声条件下提取10 min,然后使用Oasis PRIME高效液相色谱柱进行固相萃取。最后采用DMSO辅助浓缩:收集有机层,加入100 μL DMSO,在40℃的氮气流下干燥。在残渣中加入乙腈-水(1∶9,v/v),得到终体积1.0 mL,用于UPLC-MS/MS。色谱柱为HSS T3 (100 mm×2.1 mm, 1.8 μm),流动相为0.1% (v/v)甲酸水溶液(含0.02 mmol/L乙酸铵)和甲醇。在UPLC-MS/MS过程中,采用电喷雾离子源(ESI)在正离子和多重反应监测(MRM)模式下对样品进行检测。在优化条件下,18种目标麻药在1.00 ~ 50.0 μg/L范围内线性良好,相关系数(R2)均>0.999。检出限(lod)为0.2 ~ 0.5 μg/kg,定量限(loq)为0.6 ~ 1.5 μg/kg。在猪肉、牛肉和羊肉中,加标回收率为83.4% ~ 100.4%,相对标准偏差(rsd)为3.1% ~ 8.5%。该方法简便、快速、灵敏,可用于动物肉中18种麻醉药的检测,为中国食品安全部门监测动物肉中麻醉药残留提供技术支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
色谱
色谱 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
42.90%
发文量
7198
期刊介绍: "Chinese Journal of Chromatography" mainly reports the basic research results of chromatography, important application results of chromatography and its interdisciplinary subjects and their progress, including the application of new methods, new technologies, and new instruments in various fields, the research and development of chromatography instruments and components, instrument analysis teaching research, etc. It is suitable for researchers engaged in chromatography basic and application technology research in scientific research institutes, master and doctoral students in chromatography and related disciplines, grassroots researchers in the field of analysis and testing, and relevant personnel in chromatography instrument development and operation units. The journal has columns such as special planning, focus, perspective, research express, research paper, monograph and review, micro review, technology and application, and teaching research.
期刊最新文献
[Off-line comprehensive two-dimensional countercurrent chromatography-liquid chromatography separation of Curcuma volatile oil]. [Advances in synthesis methods and applications of microporous organic networks for sample preparation]. [Application progress of on-line sample preparation techniques coupled with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry system in the detection of food hazards]. [Chiral capillary gas chromatography for the separation of the enantiomers of 4-chloromethyl-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolane]. [Determination of 14 β-agonists in animal meat by ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1