Palliative care management in patients with Parkinson’s disease and other movement disorders in Spain. National survey of neurologists

M. Álvarez Saúco , R. García- Ramos , I. Legarda Ramírez , F. Carrillo García , J. Fernández Bueno , S. Martí Martínez , B. González García , A. Moya-Martínez , D. Santos-García
{"title":"Palliative care management in patients with Parkinson’s disease and other movement disorders in Spain. National survey of neurologists","authors":"M. Álvarez Saúco ,&nbsp;R. García- Ramos ,&nbsp;I. Legarda Ramírez ,&nbsp;F. Carrillo García ,&nbsp;J. Fernández Bueno ,&nbsp;S. Martí Martínez ,&nbsp;B. González García ,&nbsp;A. Moya-Martínez ,&nbsp;D. Santos-García","doi":"10.1016/j.nrleng.2021.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Palliative care in neurodegenerative diseases is useful but underused. The objective of this study is to know how palliative care (PC) is applied in Spain in order to identify limitations and unmet needs.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>It is a descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study, anonymous survey type of 20 questions, directed and answered by neurologists dedicated to movement disorders (MD) in Spain.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>58 responses were obtained from neurologists from 15 autonomous communities. 69% answered that they did not have a specialised MD nursing facility but did have a PC team in their centre (81%). No specific protocol for PC in MD was identified. All except one neurologist stated that they lacked sufficient training in PC, the main training need being the “advance directives explanation”. Only 1 in 4 neurologists answered routinely explaining advance healthcare planning to their patients, recognising up to 84.5% of neurologists not knowing how to assess the patient's competence. 60.3% of those surveyed answered that between 10% and 30% of their patients would be candidates for PC, although 1 in 3 said they were not clear when to refer the patient to PC. 100% of neurologists affirmed the priority need to implement PC protocols in MD.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study shows a formative deficit in PC in this area and in the care of the patient with movement disorders and their environment, and should serve as a starting point to develop consensual care protocols.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94155,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia","volume":"39 5","pages":"Pages 417-425"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173580823000196/pdfft?md5=240da4889cf7f6b3d436aa774fdb4e9b&pid=1-s2.0-S2173580823000196-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173580823000196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Palliative care in neurodegenerative diseases is useful but underused. The objective of this study is to know how palliative care (PC) is applied in Spain in order to identify limitations and unmet needs.

Materials and Methods

It is a descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study, anonymous survey type of 20 questions, directed and answered by neurologists dedicated to movement disorders (MD) in Spain.

Results

58 responses were obtained from neurologists from 15 autonomous communities. 69% answered that they did not have a specialised MD nursing facility but did have a PC team in their centre (81%). No specific protocol for PC in MD was identified. All except one neurologist stated that they lacked sufficient training in PC, the main training need being the “advance directives explanation”. Only 1 in 4 neurologists answered routinely explaining advance healthcare planning to their patients, recognising up to 84.5% of neurologists not knowing how to assess the patient's competence. 60.3% of those surveyed answered that between 10% and 30% of their patients would be candidates for PC, although 1 in 3 said they were not clear when to refer the patient to PC. 100% of neurologists affirmed the priority need to implement PC protocols in MD.

Conclusions

Our study shows a formative deficit in PC in this area and in the care of the patient with movement disorders and their environment, and should serve as a starting point to develop consensual care protocols.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西班牙帕金森病和其他运动障碍患者的姑息治疗管理。全国神经科医生调查。
导言姑息治疗在神经退行性疾病中非常有用,但却未得到充分利用。本研究旨在了解姑息治疗(PC)在西班牙的应用情况,以确定其局限性和未满足的需求:这是一项描述性、观察性、横断面研究,由西班牙专门从事运动障碍(MD)的神经科医生指导和回答 20 个问题的匿名调查:来自 15 个自治区的神经科医生共回答了 58 个问题。69%的人回答说他们没有专门的运动障碍护理机构,但在他们的中心有一个 PC 小组(81%)。没有发现针对 MD PC 的具体方案。除一名神经科医生外,其他所有医生均表示他们缺乏足够的 PC 培训,主要培训需求是 "预先指示解释"。每 4 位神经科医生中只有 1 位回答会定期向患者解释预先医疗保健计划,高达 84.5% 的神经科医生不知道如何评估患者的能力。60.3% 的受访者回答说,他们的患者中有 10% 至 30% 将成为 PC 的候选者,但每 3 人中就有 1 人表示不清楚何时应将患者转介至 PC。100%的神经科医生都肯定了在医学博士中优先实施 PC 方案的必要性:我们的研究表明,在这一领域以及在运动障碍患者的护理及其环境方面,PC 还存在一定的缺陷,因此应将其作为制定一致护理协议的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Frequency and impact of post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic life events in patients with migraine. Headache as main reason for consultation to a hospital Emergency Department in Spain: A prospective study. Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome following adenovirus vector-based vaccines to prevent COVID-19: Epidemiology and clinical presentation in Spain. Incidence and prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Spain: a systematic review Functional outcomes of patients with NORSE and FIRES treated with immunotherapy: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1