Utility of eConsults for COVID-19 vaccine-related concerns in Ontario: a cross-sectional analysis.

Graham Walter, Samira Jeimy, Clare Liddy, Sheena Guglani, Anne K Ellis, Amy Blair, Hazar Kobayaa, Zave Chad, Erin Keely
{"title":"Utility of eConsults for COVID-19 vaccine-related concerns in Ontario: a cross-sectional analysis.","authors":"Graham Walter,&nbsp;Samira Jeimy,&nbsp;Clare Liddy,&nbsp;Sheena Guglani,&nbsp;Anne K Ellis,&nbsp;Amy Blair,&nbsp;Hazar Kobayaa,&nbsp;Zave Chad,&nbsp;Erin Keely","doi":"10.1186/s13223-023-00789-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Champlain BASE™ and Ontario eConsult services are virtual platforms that serve to facilitate contact between primary care providers and specialists across Ontario, relaying patient-specific questions to relevant specialists via a secure web-based platform. Despite ample evidence regarding the general effectiveness of these platforms, their utility as it pertains to clinical concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccines has not yet been explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cross-sectional descriptive analysis of COVID-19 vaccine related eConsults on Ontario patients completed by five allergy specialists between February and October of 2021. 4318 COVID-19 vaccine-related eConsults were completed in total during this time; with 1857 completed by the five allergists participating in this analysis. Question types/content were categorized using a taxonomy developed through consensus on a weighted monthly sample of 499 total cases. Data regarding whether external resources were required to answer each eConsult, impact on primary care provider referral decisions, and allergy consultant response times were collected. A 2-question survey was completed by primary care providers following eConsultation and results were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>41.08% of eConsults received involved safety concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccine administration in the setting of prior allergic disease and another 36.1% involved a potential reaction the first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. 72.1% of eConsults were answered by specialist without needing external resources, and only 9.8% of all eConsults received resulted in a recommendation for formal in-person referral to Clinical Immunology & Allergy specialist or another subspecialty. Average time to complete eConsult was 16.4 min, and 79.7% of PCP eConsult queries which would have traditionally resulted in formal consultation were resolved based on advice provided in the eConsult without need for in-person assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates the utility of the eConsult service as it pertains to COVID-19 vaccine-related concerns. The eConsult platform proved an effective tool in diverting the need for in-person assessment by an Allergist or other medical specialty. This is significant given the large volume of eConsults completed by Allergists, and demonstrates the impact of an effective electronic delivery of care model during a time of strained resources and public health efforts directed at mass vaccination.</p>","PeriodicalId":7702,"journal":{"name":"Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology : Official Journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology","volume":"19 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158700/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology : Official Journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-023-00789-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Champlain BASE™ and Ontario eConsult services are virtual platforms that serve to facilitate contact between primary care providers and specialists across Ontario, relaying patient-specific questions to relevant specialists via a secure web-based platform. Despite ample evidence regarding the general effectiveness of these platforms, their utility as it pertains to clinical concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccines has not yet been explored.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional descriptive analysis of COVID-19 vaccine related eConsults on Ontario patients completed by five allergy specialists between February and October of 2021. 4318 COVID-19 vaccine-related eConsults were completed in total during this time; with 1857 completed by the five allergists participating in this analysis. Question types/content were categorized using a taxonomy developed through consensus on a weighted monthly sample of 499 total cases. Data regarding whether external resources were required to answer each eConsult, impact on primary care provider referral decisions, and allergy consultant response times were collected. A 2-question survey was completed by primary care providers following eConsultation and results were collected.

Results: 41.08% of eConsults received involved safety concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccine administration in the setting of prior allergic disease and another 36.1% involved a potential reaction the first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. 72.1% of eConsults were answered by specialist without needing external resources, and only 9.8% of all eConsults received resulted in a recommendation for formal in-person referral to Clinical Immunology & Allergy specialist or another subspecialty. Average time to complete eConsult was 16.4 min, and 79.7% of PCP eConsult queries which would have traditionally resulted in formal consultation were resolved based on advice provided in the eConsult without need for in-person assessment.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the utility of the eConsult service as it pertains to COVID-19 vaccine-related concerns. The eConsult platform proved an effective tool in diverting the need for in-person assessment by an Allergist or other medical specialty. This is significant given the large volume of eConsults completed by Allergists, and demonstrates the impact of an effective electronic delivery of care model during a time of strained resources and public health efforts directed at mass vaccination.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安大略省COVID-19疫苗相关问题的结果效用:横断面分析
背景:Champlain BASE™和Ontario eConsult服务是虚拟平台,用于促进安大略省初级保健提供者和专家之间的联系,通过安全的基于web的平台将患者特定问题传递给相关专家。尽管有充分的证据表明这些平台的总体有效性,但它们在涉及COVID-19疫苗的临床问题时的效用尚未得到探讨。方法:我们对2021年2月至10月期间由五名过敏专家完成的安大略省患者的COVID-19疫苗相关eConsults进行了横断面描述性分析。在此期间共完成了4318例COVID-19疫苗相关的研究结果;其中1857例由参与分析的五位过敏症专家完成。问题类型/内容使用通过对每月499个总病例加权样本达成共识而制定的分类法进行分类。收集有关是否需要外部资源来回答每个eConsult,对初级保健提供者转诊决定的影响以及过敏咨询师反应时间的数据。在会诊后,由初级保健提供者完成一份2个问题的调查,并收集结果。结果:收到的eConsults中,41.08%涉及在既往有过敏性疾病的情况下使用COVID-19疫苗的安全性问题,另外36.1%涉及首次接种COVID-19疫苗的潜在反应。72.1%的eConsults由专家回答而不需要外部资源,收到的所有eConsults中只有9.8%的人建议正式转介到临床免疫学和过敏专家或其他亚专科。完成eConsult的平均时间为16.4分钟,79.7%的传统上会导致正式咨询的PCP eConsult查询是根据eConsult中提供的建议解决的,而不需要亲自评估。结论:我们的研究证明了eConsult服务在解决COVID-19疫苗相关问题方面的效用。eConsult平台被证明是一种有效的工具,可以转移对过敏症专家或其他医学专业人员亲自评估的需求。考虑到过敏症专家完成的大量咨询结果,这一点意义重大,并证明了在资源紧张和针对大规模疫苗接种的公共卫生努力期间,有效的电子提供护理模式的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Immunoglobulin utilization in Canada: a comparative analysis of provincial guidelines and a scoping review of the literature. Mental health problems associated with idiopathic anaphylaxis. Validity of fractional exhaled nitric oxide and small airway lung function measured by IOS in the diagnosis of cough variant asthma in preschool children with chronic cough. Treatment of idiopathic anaphylaxis with dupilumab: a case report. PRevalence of the Eosinophilic Phenotype Among SeveRE asthma patients in Lebanon: results of the PREPARE study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1