Predicting Complicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Adolescent Trauma to Enhance Clinical Decisions in Imaging.

Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1097/JTN.0000000000000720
Heather X Rhodes, Gina Berg, Anthony L Shadiack, Kevin D Thomas, Jennifer L Horawski, Geoff Boyer, Sara M Kleist, Aaron I Worthley, David I Rosenberg, Scott B Gutovitz, George A Helmrich, Saptarshi Biswas, Antonio P Pepe
{"title":"Predicting Complicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Adolescent Trauma to Enhance Clinical Decisions in Imaging.","authors":"Heather X Rhodes,&nbsp;Gina Berg,&nbsp;Anthony L Shadiack,&nbsp;Kevin D Thomas,&nbsp;Jennifer L Horawski,&nbsp;Geoff Boyer,&nbsp;Sara M Kleist,&nbsp;Aaron I Worthley,&nbsp;David I Rosenberg,&nbsp;Scott B Gutovitz,&nbsp;George A Helmrich,&nbsp;Saptarshi Biswas,&nbsp;Antonio P Pepe","doi":"10.1097/JTN.0000000000000720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) traumatic brain injury algorithm is used to identify children at low risk of clinically significant traumatic brain injuries to reduce computed tomography (CT) exposure. Adapting PECARN rules based on population-specific risk stratification has been suggested to improve diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to identify center-specific patient variables, beyond PECARN rules, that may enhance the identification of patients requiring neuroimaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted from July 1, 2016, to July 1, 2020, in a Southwestern U.S. Level II pediatric trauma center. The inclusion criteria were adolescents (10-15 years), Glasgow Coma Scale (13-15), with a confirmed mechanical blow to the head. Patients without a head CT were excluded. Logistic regression was performed to identify additional complicated mild traumatic brain injury predictor variables beyond the PECARN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 136 patients studied; 21 (15%) presented with a complicated mild traumatic brain injury. Relative to motorcycle collision or all-terrain vehicle trauma (odds ratio [OR] 211.75, 95% confidence interval, CI [4.51, 9931.41], p < .001), an unspecified mechanism (OR 42.0, 95% CI [1.30, 1350.97], p = .03) and consult activation (OR 17.44, 95% CI [1.75, 173.31], p = .01) were significantly associated with complicated mild traumatic brain injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified additional factors associated with complex mild traumatic brain injury, including motorcycle collision and all-terrain vehicle trauma, unspecified mechanism, and consult activation that are not in the PECARN imaging decision rule. Adding these variables may aid in determining the need for appropriate CT scanning.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"30 3","pages":"150-157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) traumatic brain injury algorithm is used to identify children at low risk of clinically significant traumatic brain injuries to reduce computed tomography (CT) exposure. Adapting PECARN rules based on population-specific risk stratification has been suggested to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Objective: This study sought to identify center-specific patient variables, beyond PECARN rules, that may enhance the identification of patients requiring neuroimaging.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted from July 1, 2016, to July 1, 2020, in a Southwestern U.S. Level II pediatric trauma center. The inclusion criteria were adolescents (10-15 years), Glasgow Coma Scale (13-15), with a confirmed mechanical blow to the head. Patients without a head CT were excluded. Logistic regression was performed to identify additional complicated mild traumatic brain injury predictor variables beyond the PECARN.

Results: There were 136 patients studied; 21 (15%) presented with a complicated mild traumatic brain injury. Relative to motorcycle collision or all-terrain vehicle trauma (odds ratio [OR] 211.75, 95% confidence interval, CI [4.51, 9931.41], p < .001), an unspecified mechanism (OR 42.0, 95% CI [1.30, 1350.97], p = .03) and consult activation (OR 17.44, 95% CI [1.75, 173.31], p = .01) were significantly associated with complicated mild traumatic brain injury.

Conclusions: We identified additional factors associated with complex mild traumatic brain injury, including motorcycle collision and all-terrain vehicle trauma, unspecified mechanism, and consult activation that are not in the PECARN imaging decision rule. Adding these variables may aid in determining the need for appropriate CT scanning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
预测青少年创伤中复杂的轻度外伤性脑损伤以增强影像学的临床决策。
背景:使用儿科急诊应用研究网络(PECARN)创伤性脑损伤算法来识别具有临床显著性创伤性脑损伤低风险的儿童,以减少计算机断层扫描(CT)暴露。根据特定人群的风险分层,建议采用PECARN规则来提高诊断的准确性。目的:本研究旨在确定PECARN规则之外的中心特异性患者变量,以增强对需要神经影像学检查的患者的识别。方法:这项单中心、回顾性队列研究于2016年7月1日至2020年7月1日在美国西南部一家二级儿科创伤中心进行。纳入标准为青少年(10-15岁),格拉斯哥昏迷量表(13-15),确认头部有机械打击。没有头部CT检查的患者被排除在外。采用逻辑回归来确定PECARN之外的其他复杂的轻度外伤性脑损伤预测变量。结果:共纳入136例患者;21例(15%)表现为复杂的轻度外伤性脑损伤。相对于摩托车碰撞或全地形车辆创伤(优势比[or] 211.75, 95%可信区间,CI [4.51, 9931.41], p < .001),未明确机制(or 42.0, 95% CI [1.30, 1350.97], p = .03)和咨询激活(or 17.44, 95% CI [1.75, 173.31], p = .01)与复杂轻度外伤性脑损伤显著相关。结论:我们确定了与复杂轻度创伤性脑损伤相关的其他因素,包括摩托车碰撞和全地形车辆创伤,未明确的机制,以及PECARN成像决策规则之外的咨询激活。添加这些变量可能有助于确定是否需要适当的CT扫描。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1