Discordance of estrogen and progesterone receptors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Journal of cancer research and therapeutics Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_873_21
Surabhi Gupta, Alvin Anto, Juhi Singhal, Pooja Agarwal
{"title":"Discordance of estrogen and progesterone receptors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.","authors":"Surabhi Gupta,&nbsp;Alvin Anto,&nbsp;Juhi Singhal,&nbsp;Pooja Agarwal","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_873_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare hormone receptor (HR) status before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy that is discordance in locally advanced breast cancer patients, which are amenable for surgery. The secondary objective was to study the correlation between tumor response and HR expression.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The duration of the study was from August 2018 to December 2020. A total of 23 patients were selected as per certain inclusion criteria. American Society of Clinical Oncologys methodology was used to analyze estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status of histopathology specimen. For study purposes, patients were classified into four groups after core biopsy of breast lump and after definitive surgery (post-NACT (neoadjuvant chemotherapy)) - Group A (ER+, PR+), Group B (ER+, PR-), Group C (ER-, PR+), and Group D (ER-, PR-).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ER discordance was found to be (2/23) 8.69% (P value 0.76). PR discordance was (4/23) 17.39%. PR discordance was found to be higher than ER discordance. Changes in staining patterns in ERs were seen in 14 patients (93.33%). Changes in staining percentage in PRs were seen in eight patients (80%). It was found that both receptor-positive and negative diseases had an equal proportion of stable disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>From the study, it is noted that performing ER PR study twice (before and after chemotherapy) is necessary as discordance is noted and this may impact the further treatment strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_873_21","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and objective: This study aimed to compare hormone receptor (HR) status before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy that is discordance in locally advanced breast cancer patients, which are amenable for surgery. The secondary objective was to study the correlation between tumor response and HR expression.

Materials and methods: The duration of the study was from August 2018 to December 2020. A total of 23 patients were selected as per certain inclusion criteria. American Society of Clinical Oncologys methodology was used to analyze estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status of histopathology specimen. For study purposes, patients were classified into four groups after core biopsy of breast lump and after definitive surgery (post-NACT (neoadjuvant chemotherapy)) - Group A (ER+, PR+), Group B (ER+, PR-), Group C (ER-, PR+), and Group D (ER-, PR-).

Results: ER discordance was found to be (2/23) 8.69% (P value 0.76). PR discordance was (4/23) 17.39%. PR discordance was found to be higher than ER discordance. Changes in staining patterns in ERs were seen in 14 patients (93.33%). Changes in staining percentage in PRs were seen in eight patients (80%). It was found that both receptor-positive and negative diseases had an equal proportion of stable disease.

Conclusion: From the study, it is noted that performing ER PR study twice (before and after chemotherapy) is necessary as discordance is noted and this may impact the further treatment strategy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部晚期乳腺癌新辅助化疗后雌激素和孕激素受体的不一致。
目的:本研究旨在比较适合手术的局部晚期乳腺癌患者在新辅助化疗前后激素受体(HR)状态的不一致性。次要目的是研究肿瘤反应与HR表达的相关性。材料与方法:研究时间为2018年8月至2020年12月。按照一定的纳入标准,共选择23例患者。采用美国临床肿瘤学会的方法分析组织病理标本的雌激素受体(ER)和孕激素受体(PR)状态。为了研究目的,患者在乳房肿块核心活检和最终手术后分为四组(nact(新辅助化疗)后)- A组(ER+, PR+), B组(ER+, PR-), C组(ER-, PR+)和D组(ER-, PR-)。结果:ER不一致性为(2/23)8.69% (P值0.76)。PR不一致性为(4/23)17.39%。PR不一致高于ER不一致。14例(93.33%)患者内窥镜染色改变。8例(80%)患者pr染色百分比发生变化。结果发现,受体阳性和阴性疾病在稳定型疾病中所占比例相等。结论:从研究中可以看出,在化疗前后进行两次ER PR研究是必要的,因为发现了不一致,这可能会影响进一步的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
299
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of Medical oncology, radiation oncology, medical imaging, radiation protection, non-ionising radiation, radiobiology. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in technically unresectable moderately advanced oral cavity cancers Gastrointestinal bleeding due to obstruction of the superior mesenteric vein Microwave ablation combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty for treating painful non-small cell lung cancer with spinal metastases under real-time temperature monitoring Incidence of thromboembolic events in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis Intra-fractional dose rate effect in continuous and interrupted irradiation of the MCF-7 cell line: Possible radiobiological implications for breath-hold techniques in breast radiotherapy?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1