Role of the 1st booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine in the protection against the infection: A fundamental public health tool.

Sebastiano Calimeri, Daniela Lo Giudice, Agata Buda, Antonio Laganà, Alessio Facciolà, Angela DI Pietro, Giuseppa Visalli
{"title":"Role of the 1<sup>st</sup> booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine in the protection against the infection: A fundamental public health tool.","authors":"Sebastiano Calimeri,&nbsp;Daniela Lo Giudice,&nbsp;Agata Buda,&nbsp;Antonio Laganà,&nbsp;Alessio Facciolà,&nbsp;Angela DI Pietro,&nbsp;Giuseppa Visalli","doi":"10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.4.2742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic is having a huge impact on human health with high morbidity and mortality rates worldwide. Healthcare Workers (HCWs) are one of the most at risk categories to contract the infection. Effective anti-COVID-19 vaccines were approved in a very short time. Making the 1<sup>st</sup> booster dose is essential to induce a good protection against the infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective sero-epidemiological survey of already existing data concerning the antibody response of a HCWs sample vaccinated with the primary cycle and the 1<sup>st</sup> booster dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine and, specifically, after three weeks from the third dose of vaccination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our analysis, after the primary cycle, a 95.15% efficacy was detected. Among the non-responders, women were significantly more frequent (69.56%). Moreover, we found a significant reverse correlation between the immune response and the age of the sample, especially in women. However, the 1<sup>st</sup> booster dose completely cancelled these differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data are perfectly in line with what has been declared by the conducted studies in terms of efficacy. However, it is important to highlight that people with only the primary cycle are at high risk to contract the COVID-19 infection. Therefore, it is necessary to not consider people vaccinated with the primary cycle completely risk-free and to stress the importance to perform the 1<sup>st</sup> booster dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":35174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene","volume":"63 4","pages":"E520-E526"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9986990/pdf/jpmh-2022-04-e520.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.4.2742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic is having a huge impact on human health with high morbidity and mortality rates worldwide. Healthcare Workers (HCWs) are one of the most at risk categories to contract the infection. Effective anti-COVID-19 vaccines were approved in a very short time. Making the 1st booster dose is essential to induce a good protection against the infection.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective sero-epidemiological survey of already existing data concerning the antibody response of a HCWs sample vaccinated with the primary cycle and the 1st booster dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine and, specifically, after three weeks from the third dose of vaccination.

Results: In our analysis, after the primary cycle, a 95.15% efficacy was detected. Among the non-responders, women were significantly more frequent (69.56%). Moreover, we found a significant reverse correlation between the immune response and the age of the sample, especially in women. However, the 1st booster dose completely cancelled these differences.

Conclusions: Our data are perfectly in line with what has been declared by the conducted studies in terms of efficacy. However, it is important to highlight that people with only the primary cycle are at high risk to contract the COVID-19 infection. Therefore, it is necessary to not consider people vaccinated with the primary cycle completely risk-free and to stress the importance to perform the 1st booster dose.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19疫苗第一次加强剂在预防感染中的作用:一种基本的公共卫生工具。
新冠肺炎大流行在全球范围内的发病率和死亡率都很高,对人类健康造成了巨大影响。卫生保健工作者(HCWs)是感染风险最高的人群之一。有效的抗covid -19疫苗在很短的时间内获得批准。制作第一剂加强剂对于诱导对感染的良好保护至关重要。方法:我们对接种第一周期和第一剂辉瑞- biontech COVID-19 mRNA疫苗的HCWs样本进行了回顾性血清流行病学调查,特别是在接种第三剂疫苗后三周后的抗体反应。结果:在我们的分析中,第一周期后的有效率为95.15%。在无应答者中,女性明显更频繁(69.56%)。此外,我们发现免疫反应与样本年龄之间存在显著的负相关,尤其是在女性中。然而,第一次增强剂量完全消除了这些差异。结论:我们的数据完全符合所进行的研究在功效方面的声明。然而,必须强调的是,只有初级月经周期的人感染COVID-19的风险很高。因此,有必要不认为接种第一周期疫苗的人完全没有风险,并强调进行第一次加强剂量的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The journal is published on a four-monthly basis and covers the field of epidemiology and community health. The journal publishes original papers and proceedings of Symposia and/or Conferences which should be submitted in English. Papers are accepted on their originality and general interest. Ethical considerations will be taken into account.
期刊最新文献
Poc (Pox), a term for various infectious diseases in the history of public health and epidemiology: the dreaded Smallpox, the almost unknown Alastrim and the Mpox. Use of medicines to alleviate negative emotional states among adolescents attending Special Education Centres. The role of statistical significance in health risk assessment and in the decision-making process. [The new 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine for the prevention of S. pneumoniae infections in pediatric age: a Health Technology Assessment]. Can a UV-C box help the cinema industry by disinfecting video cameras?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1