Epidemiology of intimate partner violence perpetration and victimisation in a representative sample.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences Pub Date : 2023-04-19 DOI:10.1017/S2045796023000069
Vera Clemens, Jörg M Fegert, Barbara Kavemann, Thomas Meysen, Ute Ziegenhain, Elmar Brähler, Andreas Jud
{"title":"Epidemiology of intimate partner violence perpetration and victimisation in a representative sample.","authors":"Vera Clemens,&nbsp;Jörg M Fegert,&nbsp;Barbara Kavemann,&nbsp;Thomas Meysen,&nbsp;Ute Ziegenhain,&nbsp;Elmar Brähler,&nbsp;Andreas Jud","doi":"10.1017/S2045796023000069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a major global public health problem. Although IPV is known to be frequent and perpetration and victimisation often co-occur, large representative samples assessing both, male and female IPV perpetration and victimisation and overlaps are missing to date. Thus, we aimed to assess victimisation and perpetration and its overlap in physical, sexual, psychological and economic IPV in a representative sample of the German population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional, observational study in Germany from July to October 2021. Using different sampling steps including a random route procedure, a probability sample of the German population was generated. The final sample consisted of 2503 persons (50.2% female, mean age: 49.5 years). Participants were asked about socio-demographic information in a face-to-face interview and experience of physical, psychological, sexual and economic IPV using a questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant proportion of persons in Germany reporting IPV are both perpetrator and victim for each IPV form. The biggest overlap between perpetration and victimisation was seen for psychological IPV. Major risk factors for IPV perpetration only were male gender and adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) while major risk factors for IPV victimisation only comprised of female gender, low household income and ACEs. In the perpetration and victimisation group, gender differences were less significant; older age and lower household income did increase the likelihood of combined perpetration and victimisation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have identified a significant overlap of perpetration and victimisation of IPV in the German population for men and women. However, men are at much higher risk to perpetrate IPV without being a victim. Further research and the development of adapted approaches for contexts of overlapping IPV are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10130731/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796023000069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aims: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a major global public health problem. Although IPV is known to be frequent and perpetration and victimisation often co-occur, large representative samples assessing both, male and female IPV perpetration and victimisation and overlaps are missing to date. Thus, we aimed to assess victimisation and perpetration and its overlap in physical, sexual, psychological and economic IPV in a representative sample of the German population.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, observational study in Germany from July to October 2021. Using different sampling steps including a random route procedure, a probability sample of the German population was generated. The final sample consisted of 2503 persons (50.2% female, mean age: 49.5 years). Participants were asked about socio-demographic information in a face-to-face interview and experience of physical, psychological, sexual and economic IPV using a questionnaire.

Results: A significant proportion of persons in Germany reporting IPV are both perpetrator and victim for each IPV form. The biggest overlap between perpetration and victimisation was seen for psychological IPV. Major risk factors for IPV perpetration only were male gender and adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) while major risk factors for IPV victimisation only comprised of female gender, low household income and ACEs. In the perpetration and victimisation group, gender differences were less significant; older age and lower household income did increase the likelihood of combined perpetration and victimisation.

Conclusions: We have identified a significant overlap of perpetration and victimisation of IPV in the German population for men and women. However, men are at much higher risk to perpetrate IPV without being a victim. Further research and the development of adapted approaches for contexts of overlapping IPV are necessary.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
代表性样本中亲密伴侣暴力实施和受害的流行病学。
目的:亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是一个重大的全球公共卫生问题。虽然已知IPV是经常发生的,而且犯罪和受害往往同时发生,但迄今为止缺乏评估男性和女性IPV犯罪和受害以及重叠的大型代表性样本。因此,我们的目的是在德国人口的代表性样本中评估受害和犯罪及其在身体,性,心理和经济IPV方面的重叠。方法:我们于2021年7月至10月在德国进行了一项横断面观察性研究。采用不同的抽样步骤,包括随机路径程序,生成了德国人口的概率样本。最终样本包括2503人(50.2%为女性,平均年龄49.5岁)。参与者在面对面访谈中被问及社会人口信息,并使用问卷调查身体、心理、性和经济IPV的经历。结果:在德国报告IPV的人中,有很大一部分人是每一种IPV形式的肇事者和受害者。犯罪和受害之间最大的重叠是心理上的IPV。IPV侵害的主要危险因素只有男性性别和不良童年经历(ace),而IPV侵害的主要危险因素只有女性性别、低收入家庭和不良童年经历。在犯罪和受害组,性别差异不太显著;年龄较大和家庭收入较低确实增加了犯罪和受害的可能性。结论:我们已经确定了德国人口中男性和女性IPV的肇事者和受害者的显著重叠。然而,男性在没有成为受害者的情况下犯下IPV的风险要高得多。有必要进一步研究和开发适用于重叠IPV上下文的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
1.20%
发文量
121
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences is a prestigious international, peer-reviewed journal that has been publishing in Open Access format since 2020. Formerly known as Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale and established in 1992 by Michele Tansella, the journal prioritizes highly relevant and innovative research articles and systematic reviews in the areas of public mental health and policy, mental health services and system research, as well as epidemiological and social psychiatry. Join us in advancing knowledge and understanding in these critical fields.
期刊最新文献
Interactions of the CSF3R polymorphism and early stress on future orientation: evidence for the differential model of stress-related growth. The pain and mental health comorbidity. Effectiveness of group problem management plus in distressed Syrian refugees in Türkiye: a randomized controlled trial. Let's talk about recovery in mental health: an international Delphi study of experts by experience. Obsessive-compulsive disorder and suicide: a longitudinal study in Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1