Yong-Hoon Won, Yoon Tae Goo, Gi Hyeong Sin, Sun Ho Hong, Chang Hyun Kim, Min-Ju Kim, Tae Hwa Lee, Young Wook Choi
{"title":"Immediate-release tablet formulation of rebamipide and a pharmacokinetic study in healthy human subjects.","authors":"Yong-Hoon Won, Yoon Tae Goo, Gi Hyeong Sin, Sun Ho Hong, Chang Hyun Kim, Min-Ju Kim, Tae Hwa Lee, Young Wook Choi","doi":"10.5414/CP204329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop an immediate-release tablet preparation containing rebamipide (RBM) and perform the bioavailability assessment in the healthy human subjects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Raw RBM powder was characterized using differential scanning calorimetry, powder X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RBM tablets were manufactured by the wet granulation method, and their dissolution behavior was compared with the reference tablet (Mucosta). A phase I study (n = 47; sequence-randomized, open-label, single-dose, and two-way cross-over design) was designed for oral administration of a test formulation (F4) and Mucosta to healthy human male subjects, and pharmacokinetic parameters including the maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) and area under the curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUC<sub>0-12h</sub>) were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RBM powder had a multimodal size distribution with typical crystallinity, and the needle-like and elongated morphologies of RBM were visualized using SEM. Various tablet formulations (F1 - F6) were successfully manufactured using wet granulation method. F4 formulation was selected based on the dissolution profile most equivalent to that of Mucosta. F4 was stable for 6 months under accelerated and long-term storage conditions. Based on one-way analysis of variance, the AUC<sub>0-12h</sub> (F(1,92) = 2.40, p = 0.13) and t<sub>max</sub> (F(1,92) = 0.04, p = 0.85) were not significantly different; however, the C<sub>max</sub> (F(1,92) = 5.45, p = 0.022) showed significant difference between F4 and reference tablets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite similar in vitro dissolution profiles, in vivo pharmacokinetic results revealed a partial difference between F4 and reference tablets. Thus, further study on formulation development is still needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13963,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","volume":"61 6","pages":"273-288"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/CP204329","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To develop an immediate-release tablet preparation containing rebamipide (RBM) and perform the bioavailability assessment in the healthy human subjects.
Materials and methods: Raw RBM powder was characterized using differential scanning calorimetry, powder X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RBM tablets were manufactured by the wet granulation method, and their dissolution behavior was compared with the reference tablet (Mucosta). A phase I study (n = 47; sequence-randomized, open-label, single-dose, and two-way cross-over design) was designed for oral administration of a test formulation (F4) and Mucosta to healthy human male subjects, and pharmacokinetic parameters including the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUC0-12h) were compared.
Results: RBM powder had a multimodal size distribution with typical crystallinity, and the needle-like and elongated morphologies of RBM were visualized using SEM. Various tablet formulations (F1 - F6) were successfully manufactured using wet granulation method. F4 formulation was selected based on the dissolution profile most equivalent to that of Mucosta. F4 was stable for 6 months under accelerated and long-term storage conditions. Based on one-way analysis of variance, the AUC0-12h (F(1,92) = 2.40, p = 0.13) and tmax (F(1,92) = 0.04, p = 0.85) were not significantly different; however, the Cmax (F(1,92) = 5.45, p = 0.022) showed significant difference between F4 and reference tablets.
Conclusion: Despite similar in vitro dissolution profiles, in vivo pharmacokinetic results revealed a partial difference between F4 and reference tablets. Thus, further study on formulation development is still needed.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics appears monthly and publishes manuscripts containing original material with emphasis on the following topics: Clinical trials, Pharmacoepidemiology - Pharmacovigilance, Pharmacodynamics, Drug disposition and Pharmacokinetics, Quality assurance, Pharmacogenetics, Biotechnological drugs such as cytokines and recombinant antibiotics. Case reports on adverse reactions are also of interest.