The curse and opportunity of heterogeneity in the pursuit of psychiatric biomarkers.

IF 73.3 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine World Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1002/wps.21085
Lianne Schmaal
{"title":"The curse and opportunity of heterogeneity in the pursuit of psychiatric biomarkers.","authors":"Lianne Schmaal","doi":"10.1002/wps.21085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"271 other and which cluster with a target outcome, using replication to build confidence in an interpretation. Indeed, in the Bipolar and Schizophrenia Network for Intermediate Phenotypes (BSNIP) study, it was the entire biomarker battery which went into defining the final characteristics of the experimental biomarkerdefined entities, which were called “psychosis biotypes”. These biotype constructs have provided research with an alternative to phenomenologically defined entities, as a stage in developing final disease cate gories. Moreover, it is the full biomarker battery which can be ap plied to distinguishing and understanding defined features of the illness, such as negative symptoms. BSNIP researchers have developed several individual studies, now ongoing, to test the clinical applicability of the above biotype constructs. One such study tests the hypothesis that biotype 1, with its low intrinsic EEG activity, is a biomarker which indicates responsiveness to clozapine; specifically, we test the hypothesis that increasing intrinsic EEG activity with clozapine in biotype 1 will correlate with symptomatological improvement, using the attractor network model. A second study, designed to predict treatment response in early psychosis, hypothesizes that the biotypes will define good (biotype 3), moderate (biotype 2) or poor (biotype 1) response to standard coordinated specialty care (CSC). In each of these examples, a doubleblind trial of the biomarker observation (now ongoing) is necessary, and its application can only be supported if this is done with rigorous design. There is no doubt that considerable hard work will have to go into the study of biomarkers in psychiatry before we are able to bring them to a clinically useful place. Yet, the validation of biomarkers, as reviewed in AbiDargham et al’s paper, can be so decisive for the future of our field that these stud ies need to be conducted. Costs have to be born. Yes, wisely; but urgently.","PeriodicalId":23858,"journal":{"name":"World Psychiatry","volume":"22 2","pages":"271-272"},"PeriodicalIF":73.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10168170/pdf/WPS-22-271.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21085","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

271 other and which cluster with a target outcome, using replication to build confidence in an interpretation. Indeed, in the Bipolar and Schizophrenia Network for Intermediate Phenotypes (BSNIP) study, it was the entire biomarker battery which went into defining the final characteristics of the experimental biomarkerdefined entities, which were called “psychosis biotypes”. These biotype constructs have provided research with an alternative to phenomenologically defined entities, as a stage in developing final disease cate gories. Moreover, it is the full biomarker battery which can be ap plied to distinguishing and understanding defined features of the illness, such as negative symptoms. BSNIP researchers have developed several individual studies, now ongoing, to test the clinical applicability of the above biotype constructs. One such study tests the hypothesis that biotype 1, with its low intrinsic EEG activity, is a biomarker which indicates responsiveness to clozapine; specifically, we test the hypothesis that increasing intrinsic EEG activity with clozapine in biotype 1 will correlate with symptomatological improvement, using the attractor network model. A second study, designed to predict treatment response in early psychosis, hypothesizes that the biotypes will define good (biotype 3), moderate (biotype 2) or poor (biotype 1) response to standard coordinated specialty care (CSC). In each of these examples, a doubleblind trial of the biomarker observation (now ongoing) is necessary, and its application can only be supported if this is done with rigorous design. There is no doubt that considerable hard work will have to go into the study of biomarkers in psychiatry before we are able to bring them to a clinically useful place. Yet, the validation of biomarkers, as reviewed in AbiDargham et al’s paper, can be so decisive for the future of our field that these stud ies need to be conducted. Costs have to be born. Yes, wisely; but urgently.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神病学生物标志物研究中异质性的诅咒与机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Psychiatry
World Psychiatry Nursing-Psychiatric Mental Health
CiteScore
64.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: World Psychiatry is the official journal of the World Psychiatric Association. It aims to disseminate information on significant clinical, service, and research developments in the mental health field. World Psychiatry is published three times per year and is sent free of charge to psychiatrists.The recipient psychiatrists' names and addresses are provided by WPA member societies and sections.The language used in the journal is designed to be understandable by the majority of mental health professionals worldwide.
期刊最新文献
The contribution of the WPA to the development of the ICD-11 CDDR. A report from the WPA Working Group on Providing Mental Health Care for Migrants and Refugees. Global launch of the ICD-11 Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Requirements (CDDR). Addictive disorders through the lens of the WPA Section on Addiction Psychiatry. Physician-assisted dying in people with mental health conditions - whose choice?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1