Efficacy and Prognosis of Adjuvant Argatroban Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients with Early Neurological Deterioration.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Discovery medicine Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.24976/Discov.Med.202335175.19
Shu Xu, Wenjun Zhang, Yan Zhang, Zhou Xu, Ting Wu
{"title":"Efficacy and Prognosis of Adjuvant Argatroban Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients with Early Neurological Deterioration.","authors":"Shu Xu,&nbsp;Wenjun Zhang,&nbsp;Yan Zhang,&nbsp;Zhou Xu,&nbsp;Ting Wu","doi":"10.24976/Discov.Med.202335175.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The therapeutic outcomes for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with early neurological deterioration (END) are adverse. Argatroban is a novel direct thrombin inhibitor, which is safe in the treatment of AIS, but its efficacy is controversial. This study sought to assess the therapeutic effect of argatroban as an adjunct to aspirin in the treatment of AIS patients with END. Patients' prognosis for the presence of END was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overall, 166 AIS patients with END were included in the study from June 2018 to June 2021 in The Affiliated Zhangjiagang Hospital of Soochow University. Patients were divided in the control group (aspirin alone) and the study group (aspirin combined with argatroban). General data of the patients were collected. Clinical indexes such as the modified Edinburgh-Scandinavian stroke scale (MESSS), and the serum fibrinogen (FIB) and neuropeptide Y (NPY) levels before and after treatment were also collected. Correlations between prognosis and general data, and FIB and NPY levels in AIS patients with END were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. The performance of FIB and NPY levels in predicting patients' prognosis was further analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in the general data, such as sex, age, course of disease and basic diseases between the 2 groups. After treatment, the MESSS score (13.08 ± 3.24 vs. 16.48 ± 3.32, <i>p</i> < 0.001), serum FIB level (2.72 ± 0.81 vs. 3.52 ± 0.71, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and NPY level (121.28 ± 17.34 vs. 152.09 ± 18.25, <i>p</i> < 0.001) of the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group. A further analysis revealed that the serum FIB (OR, odds ratio = 2.296, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.437-3.669, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and NPY (OR = 1.020, 95% CI: 1.002-1.039, <i>p</i> = 0.031) levels were independent risk factors of patients' prognosis for the presence of END.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Aspirin combined with argatroban significantly improved neurological impairment of AIS patients with END, which is worthy of clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":11379,"journal":{"name":"Discovery medicine","volume":"35 175","pages":"185-192"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discovery medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24976/Discov.Med.202335175.19","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The therapeutic outcomes for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with early neurological deterioration (END) are adverse. Argatroban is a novel direct thrombin inhibitor, which is safe in the treatment of AIS, but its efficacy is controversial. This study sought to assess the therapeutic effect of argatroban as an adjunct to aspirin in the treatment of AIS patients with END. Patients' prognosis for the presence of END was also evaluated.

Methods: Overall, 166 AIS patients with END were included in the study from June 2018 to June 2021 in The Affiliated Zhangjiagang Hospital of Soochow University. Patients were divided in the control group (aspirin alone) and the study group (aspirin combined with argatroban). General data of the patients were collected. Clinical indexes such as the modified Edinburgh-Scandinavian stroke scale (MESSS), and the serum fibrinogen (FIB) and neuropeptide Y (NPY) levels before and after treatment were also collected. Correlations between prognosis and general data, and FIB and NPY levels in AIS patients with END were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. The performance of FIB and NPY levels in predicting patients' prognosis was further analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results: There was no significant difference in the general data, such as sex, age, course of disease and basic diseases between the 2 groups. After treatment, the MESSS score (13.08 ± 3.24 vs. 16.48 ± 3.32, p < 0.001), serum FIB level (2.72 ± 0.81 vs. 3.52 ± 0.71, p < 0.001), and NPY level (121.28 ± 17.34 vs. 152.09 ± 18.25, p < 0.001) of the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group. A further analysis revealed that the serum FIB (OR, odds ratio = 2.296, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.437-3.669, p = 0.001) and NPY (OR = 1.020, 95% CI: 1.002-1.039, p = 0.031) levels were independent risk factors of patients' prognosis for the presence of END.

Conclusions: Aspirin combined with argatroban significantly improved neurological impairment of AIS patients with END, which is worthy of clinical application.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿加曲班辅助治疗急性缺血性脑卒中伴早期神经功能恶化的疗效及预后。
背景:急性缺血性卒中(AIS)伴早期神经功能恶化(END)的治疗结果是不利的。阿加曲班是一种新型的直接凝血酶抑制剂,治疗AIS是安全的,但其疗效存在争议。本研究旨在评估阿加曲班作为阿司匹林辅助治疗AIS合并终末期患者的疗效。还评估了患者存在END的预后。方法:2018年6月至2021年6月,苏州大学附属张家港医院共纳入166例AIS合并END患者。患者分为对照组(阿司匹林单独)和研究组(阿司匹林联合阿加曲班)。收集患者的一般资料。收集治疗前后的临床指标,如改进的爱丁堡-斯堪的纳维亚卒中量表(MESSS),血清纤维蛋白原(FIB)和神经肽Y (NPY)水平。采用多因素logistic回归分析AIS合并END患者预后与一般数据、FIB和NPY水平的相关性。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线进一步分析FIB和NPY水平对患者预后的预测作用。结果:两组患者性别、年龄、病程、基础疾病等一般资料比较,差异均无统计学意义。治疗后,研究组的mess评分(13.08±3.24比16.48±3.32,p < 0.001)、血清FIB水平(2.72±0.81比3.52±0.71,p < 0.001)、NPY水平(121.28±17.34比152.09±18.25,p < 0.001)均显著低于对照组。进一步分析发现,血清FIB (OR,比值比= 2.296,95%可信区间,CI: 1.437 ~ 3.669, p = 0.001)和NPY (OR = 1.020, 95% CI: 1.002 ~ 1.039, p = 0.031)水平是影响患者预后的独立危险因素。结论:阿司匹林联合阿加曲班可显著改善AIS合并END患者的神经功能损害,值得临床推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Discovery medicine
Discovery medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Discovery Medicine publishes novel, provocative ideas and research findings that challenge conventional notions about disease mechanisms, diagnosis, treatment, or any of the life sciences subjects. It publishes cutting-edge, reliable, and authoritative information in all branches of life sciences but primarily in the following areas: Novel therapies and diagnostics (approved or experimental); innovative ideas, research technologies, and translational research that will give rise to the next generation of new drugs and therapies; breakthrough understanding of mechanism of disease, biology, and physiology; and commercialization of biomedical discoveries pertaining to the development of new drugs, therapies, medical devices, and research technology.
期刊最新文献
The Action Mechanisms, Anti-Cancer and Antibiotic-Modulation Potential of Vaccinium myrtillus L. Extract. Development and Comparative Analysis of an Early Prediction Model for Acute Kidney Injury within 72-Hours Post-ICU Admission Using Evidence from the MIMIC-III Database. H2S Alleviates Propofol-Induced Impaired Learning and Memory by Promoting Nuclear Translocation of Nrf2 and Inhibiting Apoptosis and Pyroptosis in Hippocampal Neurons. Animal Feasibility Study of a Novel Spinal Cord Stimulation Multicolumn Lead (Heron Lead). The Clinical Significance of iNOS/NO Signaling Pathway in Traumatic Shock and the Mechanism under the Promotion on the Development of Traumatic Shock via Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1