Previous Experience in Medical Decision Making and Advance Care Planning Conversations: Findings From a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-11 DOI:10.1177/10499091231174621
Peiyuan Zhang, John G Cagle
{"title":"Previous Experience in Medical Decision Making and Advance Care Planning Conversations: Findings From a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey.","authors":"Peiyuan Zhang, John G Cagle","doi":"10.1177/10499091231174621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Despite the extensive literature on facilitating advance care planning (ACP) with patients with serious illnesses, opportunities to include surrogates or family caregivers are overlooked. The research objective was to examine whether previous medical decision-making involvement for a loved one is associated with one's own ACP conversations with family and the potential mediating effect of knowledge of a loved one's end-of-life treatment preferences. <b>Methods:</b> This study employed a cross-sectional design using data from the 2016 Kaiser Family Foundation/The Economist Four-Country Survey on Aging and End-of-Life Medical Care. The sample included 627 US adults who completed the survey and were involved in making medical decisions for a loved one in the past. Multiple binary logistic regression and linear regression models were established for mediation analyses. <b>Results:</b> Participants in our nationally derived sample were largely confident in their knowledge of a deceased loved one's end-of-life treatment preferences. 66.8% of the sample had ACP conversations with family. The involvement in a loved one's medical decision making was significantly associated with higher odds of having ACP conversations with family <i>(OR</i> = 1.93, P = .01), but this relationship was significantly mediated by knowledge of one's end-of-life treatment preferences (<i>b</i> = .31, <i>Boot CI =</i> .12-.49). <b>Conclusions:</b> Previous experience in making medical decisions for a loved one may facilitate one's own ACP behavior through knowing a loved one's end-of-life treatment preferences. Clinicians in end-of-life settings are uniquely positioned to engage family members who were involved in medical decision-making for others before in ACP.</p>","PeriodicalId":50810,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"281-287"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091231174621","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the extensive literature on facilitating advance care planning (ACP) with patients with serious illnesses, opportunities to include surrogates or family caregivers are overlooked. The research objective was to examine whether previous medical decision-making involvement for a loved one is associated with one's own ACP conversations with family and the potential mediating effect of knowledge of a loved one's end-of-life treatment preferences. Methods: This study employed a cross-sectional design using data from the 2016 Kaiser Family Foundation/The Economist Four-Country Survey on Aging and End-of-Life Medical Care. The sample included 627 US adults who completed the survey and were involved in making medical decisions for a loved one in the past. Multiple binary logistic regression and linear regression models were established for mediation analyses. Results: Participants in our nationally derived sample were largely confident in their knowledge of a deceased loved one's end-of-life treatment preferences. 66.8% of the sample had ACP conversations with family. The involvement in a loved one's medical decision making was significantly associated with higher odds of having ACP conversations with family (OR = 1.93, P = .01), but this relationship was significantly mediated by knowledge of one's end-of-life treatment preferences (b = .31, Boot CI = .12-.49). Conclusions: Previous experience in making medical decisions for a loved one may facilitate one's own ACP behavior through knowing a loved one's end-of-life treatment preferences. Clinicians in end-of-life settings are uniquely positioned to engage family members who were involved in medical decision-making for others before in ACP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗决策和预先护理计划对话中的既往经验:一项全国性横断面调查的结果。
背景:尽管有大量文献论述了如何促进重病患者的预先护理计划(ACP),但将代理或家庭照顾者纳入其中的机会却被忽视了。本研究旨在探讨之前为亲人参与医疗决策是否与自己与家人进行 ACP 对话有关,以及了解亲人临终治疗偏好的潜在中介效应。研究方法本研究采用横断面设计,使用的数据来自 2016 年凯撒家庭基金会/《经济学家》杂志关于老龄化和临终医疗护理的四国调查。样本包括 627 名完成调查并在过去参与过为亲人做出医疗决定的美国成年人。建立了多元二元逻辑回归和线性回归模型进行中介分析。结果在我们的全国样本中,参与者对自己对已故亲人临终治疗偏好的了解基本都很自信。66.8%的样本曾与家人进行过 ACP 对话。参与亲人的医疗决策与较高的与家人进行 ACP 对话的几率明显相关(OR = 1.93,P = .01),但这种关系被对自己临终治疗偏好的了解明显中介(b = .31,Boot CI = .12-.49)。结论通过了解亲人的临终治疗偏好,以往为亲人做出医疗决定的经验可能会促进自己的 ACP 行为。临终环境中的临床医生具有独特的优势,可以让曾经参与过为他人做出医疗决策的家庭成员参与到 ACP 中来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
169
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine (AJHPM) is a peer-reviewed journal, published eight times a year. In 30 years of publication, AJHPM has highlighted the interdisciplinary team approach to hospice and palliative medicine as related to the care of the patient and family. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Perceptions of Families and Nurses After Signing a Do-Not-Resuscitate Order for Patients in Respiratory Care Wards Differences in Timely Goals of Care Discussions in Nursing Homes Among Black Residents A Way Forward for Comprehensive Cancer Caregiver Support Development of a Hospice Perceptions Instrument for Diverse Patients and Families: Establishing Content and Face Validity Antibiotics at End of Life: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going? A Narrative Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1