Pandemic modelling and model citizens: Governing COVID-19 through predictive models, sovereignty and discipline.

IF 2.1 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Review Pub Date : 2023-05-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-02 DOI:10.1177/00380261221102023
Tony Sandset, Kaspar Villadsen
{"title":"Pandemic modelling and model citizens: Governing COVID-19 through predictive models, sovereignty and discipline.","authors":"Tony Sandset, Kaspar Villadsen","doi":"10.1177/00380261221102023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pandemic modelling functions as a means of producing evidence of potential events and as an instrument of intervention that Tim Rhodes and colleagues describe as entangling science into social practices, calculations into materializations, abstracts into effects and models into society. This article seeks to show how a model society evinced through mathematical models produces a model not only for society but also for citizens, showing them how to act in a certain <i>model</i> manner that prevents an anticipated pandemic future. To this end, we analyse political speeches by various Norwegian ministers to elucidate how various model-based COVID-19 responses enact a 'model citizen'. Theoretically, we combine Rhodes et al.'s arguments with Foucault's concepts of <i>law</i>, <i>discipline</i> and <i>security</i>, thus showing what a model society might imply for the model citizen. Finally, we conclude that although the model society is largely informed by epidemiological models and liberal biopolitics that typically place responsibility on individual subjects, sovereign state power remains manifestly present in the speeches' rhetoric.</p>","PeriodicalId":48250,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/30/e8/10.1177_00380261221102023.PMC10159783.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261221102023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pandemic modelling functions as a means of producing evidence of potential events and as an instrument of intervention that Tim Rhodes and colleagues describe as entangling science into social practices, calculations into materializations, abstracts into effects and models into society. This article seeks to show how a model society evinced through mathematical models produces a model not only for society but also for citizens, showing them how to act in a certain model manner that prevents an anticipated pandemic future. To this end, we analyse political speeches by various Norwegian ministers to elucidate how various model-based COVID-19 responses enact a 'model citizen'. Theoretically, we combine Rhodes et al.'s arguments with Foucault's concepts of law, discipline and security, thus showing what a model society might imply for the model citizen. Finally, we conclude that although the model society is largely informed by epidemiological models and liberal biopolitics that typically place responsibility on individual subjects, sovereign state power remains manifestly present in the speeches' rhetoric.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大流行病模型和模范公民:通过预测模型、主权和纪律管理 COVID-19。
提姆-罗兹及其同事认为,大流行病建模既是为潜在事件提供证据的手段,也是一种干预工具,它将科学与社会实践、计算与具体化、抽象与效果、模型与社会紧密联系在一起。本文试图说明,通过数学模型建立的模范社会如何不仅为社会,也为公民提供了一种模式,告诉他们如何以某种模式行事,以防止预期的大流行病的未来。为此,我们对挪威多位部长的政治演讲进行了分析,以阐明基于 COVID-19 模型的各种应对措施是如何树立 "模范公民 "形象的。从理论上讲,我们将罗兹等人的论点与福柯的法律、纪律和安全概念相结合,从而说明模范社会对模范公民可能意味着什么。最后,我们得出结论,虽然模范社会在很大程度上借鉴了流行病学模式和自由主义生物政治学,通常将责任归咎于个体主体,但主权国家的权力仍明显存在于演讲辞藻中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociological Review
Sociological Review SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The Sociological Review has been publishing high quality and innovative articles for over 100 years. During this time we have steadfastly remained a general sociological journal, selecting papers of immediate and lasting significance. Covering all branches of the discipline, including criminology, education, gender, medicine, and organization, our tradition extends to research that is anthropological or philosophical in orientation and analytical or ethnographic in approach. We focus on questions that shape the nature and scope of sociology as well as those that address the changing forms and impact of social relations. In saying this we are not soliciting papers that seek to prescribe methods or dictate perspectives for the discipline. In opening up frontiers and publishing leading-edge research, we see these heterodox issues being settled and unsettled over time by virtue of contributors keeping the debates that occupy sociologists vital and relevant.
期刊最新文献
Who counts in poverty research? Suicide as slow death: towards a haunted sociology of suicide. Varieties of alternativeness: Relational practices in collaborative housing in Vienna Grieving academic grant rejections: Examining funding failure and experiences of loss Movement meaning of money: Monetary mobilization in Hong Kong’s prodemocracy movement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1