Measurement models for visual working memory-A factorial model comparison.

IF 5.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY Psychological review Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1037/rev0000328
Klaus Oberauer
{"title":"Measurement models for visual working memory-A factorial model comparison.","authors":"Klaus Oberauer","doi":"10.1037/rev0000328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several measurement models have been proposed for data from the continuous-reproduction paradigm for studying visual working memory (WM): The original mixture model (Zhang & Luck, 2008) and its extension (Bays et al., 2009); the interference measurement model (IMM; Oberauer et al., 2017), and the target confusability competition (TCC) model (Schurgin et al., 2020). This article describes a space of possible measurement models in which all these models can be placed. The space is defined by three dimensions: (a) The choice of an activation function (von-Mises or Laplace), (b) the choice of a response-selection function (variants of Luce's choice rule or of signal-detection theory), (c) and whether or not memory precision is assumed to be a constant over manipulations affecting memory. A factorial combination of these three variables generates all possible models in the model space. Fitting all models to eight data sets revealed a new model as empirically most adequate, which combines a von-Mises activation function with a signal-detection response-selection rule. The precision parameter can be treated as a constant across many experimental manipulations, though it probably varies between individuals. All modeling code and the raw data modeled are available on the OSF: https://osf.io/zwprv/ (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":21016,"journal":{"name":"Psychological review","volume":"130 3","pages":"841-852"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000328","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Several measurement models have been proposed for data from the continuous-reproduction paradigm for studying visual working memory (WM): The original mixture model (Zhang & Luck, 2008) and its extension (Bays et al., 2009); the interference measurement model (IMM; Oberauer et al., 2017), and the target confusability competition (TCC) model (Schurgin et al., 2020). This article describes a space of possible measurement models in which all these models can be placed. The space is defined by three dimensions: (a) The choice of an activation function (von-Mises or Laplace), (b) the choice of a response-selection function (variants of Luce's choice rule or of signal-detection theory), (c) and whether or not memory precision is assumed to be a constant over manipulations affecting memory. A factorial combination of these three variables generates all possible models in the model space. Fitting all models to eight data sets revealed a new model as empirically most adequate, which combines a von-Mises activation function with a signal-detection response-selection rule. The precision parameter can be treated as a constant across many experimental manipulations, though it probably varies between individuals. All modeling code and the raw data modeled are available on the OSF: https://osf.io/zwprv/ (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视觉工作记忆的测量模型——析因模型比较。
对于研究视觉工作记忆(WM)的连续再现范式的数据,已经提出了几种测量模型:原始混合模型(Zhang & Luck, 2008)及其扩展(Bays et al., 2009);干涉测量模型(IMM);Oberauer et al., 2017)和目标混淆竞争(TCC)模型(Schurgin et al., 2020)。本文描述了一个可能的测量模型空间,所有这些模型都可以放置在其中。空间由三个维度定义:(a)激活函数的选择(von-Mises或Laplace), (b)响应选择函数的选择(Luce选择规则或信号检测理论的变体),(c)以及是否假设记忆精度是影响记忆的操作的常数。这三个变量的阶乘组合生成模型空间中所有可能的模型。将所有模型拟合到8个数据集,揭示了一个经验上最充分的新模型,该模型结合了von-Mises激活函数和信号检测响应选择规则。在许多实验操作中,精度参数可以被视为一个常数,尽管它可能因个体而异。所有建模代码和建模的原始数据都可以在OSF上获得:https://osf.io/zwprv/ (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological review
Psychological review 医学-心理学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Psychological Review publishes articles that make important theoretical contributions to any area of scientific psychology, including systematic evaluation of alternative theories.
期刊最新文献
The ecological origins of collectivism and individualism. Supplemental Material for The Ecological Origins of Collectivism and Individualism A priority map is all you need: Exploring the roots of neural mechanisms underlying transformer-based large language models. Reconceptualizing co-rumination: A novel theoretical and multidisciplinary perspective. A diffusion-based framework for modeling systematic, time-varying cognitive processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1