Can subjective cognitive complaints at three months post stroke predict alteration in information processing speed during the first year?

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1080/13825585.2022.2048786
Sonja Verstraeten, Anne Berkhoff, Ruth Mark, Margriet Sitskoorn
{"title":"Can subjective cognitive complaints at three months post stroke predict alteration in information processing speed during the first year?","authors":"Sonja Verstraeten,&nbsp;Anne Berkhoff,&nbsp;Ruth Mark,&nbsp;Margriet Sitskoorn","doi":"10.1080/13825585.2022.2048786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive impairment, particularly slowing of information processing speed (IPS), is prevalent after stroke. However, the link between subjective cognitive complaints (SCC) and cognitive deficit remains unclear. This study evaluated the link between SCC at three months post stroke and deficit as well as objective alterations in IPS in the first year post stroke. Patients (N = 200) and healthy controls (N = 105) took part in the COMPlaints After Stroke study (COMPAS). SCC, IPS and depression were evaluated at 3 months, 1 and 2 years post stroke. The Reliable Change Index was used to assess change in IPS in the first year post. Approximately one out of three patients showed deficit in IPS irrespective of time post stroke, while a change in IPS (N = 117) over time was relatively uncommon. SCC at three months post stroke did not predict change in IPS between three months and one year post stroke, where depressive symptoms did show a link. Cross sectional data showed a deficit in IPS in a substantial number of stroke patients irrespective of the point in time. Longitudinal data revealed a further decline in a small subgroup in the first year post stroke, which was not predicted by SCC at three months post stroke. The findings show that, irrespective of time post stroke and even when stroke is relatively mild, impairment in IPS is prevalent, but cannot be predicted by the complaints patients express. The link with depressive symptoms needs more exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":7532,"journal":{"name":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","volume":"30 3","pages":"472-485"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2022.2048786","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Cognitive impairment, particularly slowing of information processing speed (IPS), is prevalent after stroke. However, the link between subjective cognitive complaints (SCC) and cognitive deficit remains unclear. This study evaluated the link between SCC at three months post stroke and deficit as well as objective alterations in IPS in the first year post stroke. Patients (N = 200) and healthy controls (N = 105) took part in the COMPlaints After Stroke study (COMPAS). SCC, IPS and depression were evaluated at 3 months, 1 and 2 years post stroke. The Reliable Change Index was used to assess change in IPS in the first year post. Approximately one out of three patients showed deficit in IPS irrespective of time post stroke, while a change in IPS (N = 117) over time was relatively uncommon. SCC at three months post stroke did not predict change in IPS between three months and one year post stroke, where depressive symptoms did show a link. Cross sectional data showed a deficit in IPS in a substantial number of stroke patients irrespective of the point in time. Longitudinal data revealed a further decline in a small subgroup in the first year post stroke, which was not predicted by SCC at three months post stroke. The findings show that, irrespective of time post stroke and even when stroke is relatively mild, impairment in IPS is prevalent, but cannot be predicted by the complaints patients express. The link with depressive symptoms needs more exploration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中风后3个月的主观认知抱怨能否预测第一年信息处理速度的改变?
认知障碍,特别是信息处理速度(IPS)的减慢,是中风后普遍存在的。然而,主观认知抱怨(SCC)与认知缺陷之间的联系尚不清楚。本研究评估了脑卒中后3个月SCC与脑卒中后第一年IPS的客观改变之间的联系。患者(N = 200)和健康对照(N = 105)参加了卒中后投诉研究(COMPAS)。分别于脑卒中后3个月、1年和2年对SCC、IPS和抑郁进行评估。可靠变化指数用于评估第一年IPS的变化。大约三分之一的患者在卒中后表现出IPS缺陷,而IPS随时间的变化(N = 117)相对不常见。中风后3个月的SCC并不能预测中风后3个月到1年IPS的变化,而抑郁症状确实显示出了联系。横断面数据显示,在相当数量的卒中患者中,无论在什么时间点,IPS都存在缺陷。纵向数据显示,在中风后的第一年,一小部分亚组进一步下降,这在中风后三个月的SCC中没有预测到。研究结果表明,无论中风后的时间长短,甚至当中风相对较轻时,IPS损伤都是普遍存在的,但不能通过患者表达的抱怨来预测。与抑郁症状的联系需要更多的探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The purposes of Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition are to (a) publish research on both the normal and dysfunctional aspects of cognitive development in adulthood and aging, and (b) promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings between the fields of cognitive gerontology and neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of the journal is to publish original empirical research. Occasionally, theoretical or methodological papers, critical reviews of a content area, or theoretically relevant case studies will also be published.
期刊最新文献
Neighborhood disadvantage is associated with working memory and hippocampal volumes among older adults. Ask how they did it: untangling the relationships between task-specific strategy use, everyday strategy use, and associative memory. Development of the Telephone-based Daily Instrumental Activities of Living (T-DIAL) to assess financial management remotely in older adults. Disfluency across the lifespan: an individual differences investigation. Memory and automatic processing of valuable information in younger and older adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1