Three piece penile prosthesis salvage with chlorhexidine gluconate and length preservation: our technique and outcomes.

IF 1.5 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY American journal of clinical and experimental urology Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Shirin Razdan, Alexandra R Siegal, Kenan E Celtik, Rafael Carrion, Robert J Valenzuela
{"title":"Three piece penile prosthesis salvage with chlorhexidine gluconate and length preservation: our technique and outcomes.","authors":"Shirin Razdan,&nbsp;Alexandra R Siegal,&nbsp;Kenan E Celtik,&nbsp;Rafael Carrion,&nbsp;Robert J Valenzuela","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Since the advent of the Mulcahy technique of three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) salvage, there have been multiple iterations of salvage prosthesis procedures reported in the literature. All of these techniques employ traditional antibiotic irrigation with or without rechanneling. We present our technique of salvage IPP using 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate (Irrisept<sup>®</sup>) with corporal rechanneling for length preservation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Our technique of IPP salvage begins with access via a 5 cm vertical midline scrotal incision. Dissection down to the corpora is performed with a combination of blunt dissection and dissection with fine tipped Metzenbaum scissors. Each component of the prior IPP is sequentially removed starting with the cylinders, followed by the pump, and finally the reservoir. Irrisept<sup>®</sup> is used to copiously irrigate out both cavernosal bodies as well as the scrotal compartment and prior reservoir location. A two minute dwell time of the Irrisept<sup>®</sup> is employed after mechanical irrigation. A penrose drain is placed from the space of Retzius through a separate stab incision in the scrotum. Corporotomies are closed, followed by Dartos fascia and scrotal skin. A complete change in gown and gloves of all members of the surgical team and a new set of drapes and instruments is performed. Through a separate subcoronal incision, two new corporotomies are made and separate channels created using nine inch Metzenbaum scissors. These channels are irrigated with Irrisept<sup>®</sup>. A 9 mm malleable penile prosthesis (MPP) is inserted and corporotomies and skin incision are closed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of four men with prior penoscrotal IPP placement underwent salvage IPP with MPP from January 2022 to October 2022. Median operative time was 165 minutes. Median preoperative cylinder size was 23.5 cm. Median postoperative malleable cylinder size was 23 cm. Median length of follow up was 4.8 months. There were no cases of MPP erosion or infection. Two patients elected to undergo repeat IPP insertion after 6 months with same cylinder size.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IPP salvage with chlorhexidine irrigation and soak as well as separate corporal channeling in a noninfected field for MPP insertion is a viable strategy for infected prostheses given the ease of performance, low risk of repeat infection of the malleable device, and maintenance of corporal length of any subsequent prostheses.</p>","PeriodicalId":7438,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","volume":"11 2","pages":"155-159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10165229/pdf/ajceu0011-0155.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Since the advent of the Mulcahy technique of three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) salvage, there have been multiple iterations of salvage prosthesis procedures reported in the literature. All of these techniques employ traditional antibiotic irrigation with or without rechanneling. We present our technique of salvage IPP using 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate (Irrisept®) with corporal rechanneling for length preservation.

Materials and methods: Our technique of IPP salvage begins with access via a 5 cm vertical midline scrotal incision. Dissection down to the corpora is performed with a combination of blunt dissection and dissection with fine tipped Metzenbaum scissors. Each component of the prior IPP is sequentially removed starting with the cylinders, followed by the pump, and finally the reservoir. Irrisept® is used to copiously irrigate out both cavernosal bodies as well as the scrotal compartment and prior reservoir location. A two minute dwell time of the Irrisept® is employed after mechanical irrigation. A penrose drain is placed from the space of Retzius through a separate stab incision in the scrotum. Corporotomies are closed, followed by Dartos fascia and scrotal skin. A complete change in gown and gloves of all members of the surgical team and a new set of drapes and instruments is performed. Through a separate subcoronal incision, two new corporotomies are made and separate channels created using nine inch Metzenbaum scissors. These channels are irrigated with Irrisept®. A 9 mm malleable penile prosthesis (MPP) is inserted and corporotomies and skin incision are closed.

Results: A total of four men with prior penoscrotal IPP placement underwent salvage IPP with MPP from January 2022 to October 2022. Median operative time was 165 minutes. Median preoperative cylinder size was 23.5 cm. Median postoperative malleable cylinder size was 23 cm. Median length of follow up was 4.8 months. There were no cases of MPP erosion or infection. Two patients elected to undergo repeat IPP insertion after 6 months with same cylinder size.

Conclusion: IPP salvage with chlorhexidine irrigation and soak as well as separate corporal channeling in a noninfected field for MPP insertion is a viable strategy for infected prostheses given the ease of performance, low risk of repeat infection of the malleable device, and maintenance of corporal length of any subsequent prostheses.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄糖酸氯己定保长三片阴茎假体修复技术及效果。
目的:自Mulcahy三件套充气阴茎假体(IPP)修复技术问世以来,文献报道了多次修复假体的迭代。所有这些技术都采用传统的抗生素冲洗,有或没有重新引流。我们提出了使用0.05%葡萄糖酸氯己定(Irrisept®)的挽救性IPP技术,并采用下体再通道保存长度。材料和方法:我们的IPP抢救技术从阴囊中线垂直切口5厘米开始。通过钝性分离和细尖Metzenbaum剪刀分离的组合进行下体的分离。先前IPP的每个组件依次从钢瓶开始拆卸,然后是泵,最后是储液器。Irrisept®用于大量冲洗海绵体以及阴囊室和先前的储存库位置。机械冲洗后,Irrisept®的停留时间为两分钟。从Retzius的空间通过阴囊中单独的刺伤切口放置一个penrose引流管。闭合剖腹,然后是大筋膜和阴囊皮肤。手术团队的所有成员都要彻底更换手术服和手套,并更换一套新的窗帘和器械。通过单独的冠状下切口,进行两次新的公司切开术,并使用9英寸的Metzenbaum剪刀创建单独的通道。这些通道用Irrisept®冲洗。插入一个9mm可塑阴茎假体(MPP),并关闭体切开术和皮肤切口。结果:在2022年1月至2022年10月期间,共有4名先前在阴茎植入IPP的男性接受了补救性IPP和MPP。中位手术时间165分钟。术前中位柱体尺寸为23.5 cm。术后中位可锻铸柱尺寸为23 cm。中位随访时间为4.8个月。无MPP糜烂或感染病例。2例患者选择在6个月后以相同的圆柱体尺寸再次进行IPP插入。结论:利用洗必定冲洗和浸泡的IPP修复以及在非感染区域单独的下体通道插入MPP是一种可行的策略,因为它易于操作,可塑装置重复感染的风险低,并且可以维持任何后续假体的下体长度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Mendelian randomisation approach to explore genetic factors associated with erectile dysfunction based on pooled genomic data. Administering antibiotic-loaded irrigation fluid as an alternative for prophylactic intravenous antibiotics in transurethral ureterolithotripsy (TUL): a randomized controlled trial. Decreased expression of LncRNA CRYM-AS1 promotes apoptosis through the Hippo-YAP1 signaling pathway leading to diabetic erectile dysfunction. Minimally invasive management of extraperitoneal bladder injury with extension to the trigone of the bladder with bilateral external ureteral catheterization: innovative approach instead of open surgical treatment. N4-acetyl-sulfamethoxazole stone in a patient on chronic trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole therapy: a case report and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1