Engaging youth in mHealth: what works and how can we be sure?

IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES mHealth Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.21037/mhealth-20-48
Lisa B Hightow-Weidman, Keith J Horvath, Hyman Scott, Jonathan Hill-Rorie, Jose A Bauermeister
{"title":"Engaging youth in mHealth: what works and how can we be sure?","authors":"Lisa B Hightow-Weidman,&nbsp;Keith J Horvath,&nbsp;Hyman Scott,&nbsp;Jonathan Hill-Rorie,&nbsp;Jose A Bauermeister","doi":"10.21037/mhealth-20-48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Youth participating in mobile health (mHealth) intervention trials often engage with the technologies [e.g., applications (app) or mobile-optimized websites] only partially, often prematurely discontinuing use altogether. Limited engagement can impact the interventions effect on behavior change and compromise researchers' ability to test and estimate the true efficacy of their interventions. While mHealth interventions have been shown to be feasible and acceptable to youth, across diverse health conditions, strategies to increase engagement have been less well studied. Specifically, within HIV prevention and care mHealth interventions, there is not consensus as to which components represent the \"key ingredients\" to support maximal engagement of youth. Further, successful intervention evaluation requires the ability to systematically track users' engagement with intervention components (i.e., paradata) to evaluate its effects on behavior change.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of the Adolescent Medicine Trials Network UNC/Emory Center for Innovative Technology (iTech) portfolio of HIV/AIDS Interventions, we present diverse strategies used across five mHealth protocols seeking to promote youth engagement, track and measure engagement through paradata, and incorporate these components into mHealth intervention evaluations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We describe the importance of defining and measuring engagement using case studies from iTech to illustrate how different research teams select mHealth features to promote youth engagement over time, taking into account features embedded in the technology design, key mechanisms of change and trial outcomes (e.g., HIV testing, pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake and adherence, HIV treatment adherence). Finally, we discuss how the research teams plan to evaluate engagement's role on their intervention's outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on this synthesis, we discuss strategies to enhance mHealth engagement during intervention development and design, ensure its monitoring and reporting throughout the trial, and evaluate its impact on trial outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":"7 ","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8063019/pdf/mh-07-20-48.pdf","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mHealth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-20-48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background: Youth participating in mobile health (mHealth) intervention trials often engage with the technologies [e.g., applications (app) or mobile-optimized websites] only partially, often prematurely discontinuing use altogether. Limited engagement can impact the interventions effect on behavior change and compromise researchers' ability to test and estimate the true efficacy of their interventions. While mHealth interventions have been shown to be feasible and acceptable to youth, across diverse health conditions, strategies to increase engagement have been less well studied. Specifically, within HIV prevention and care mHealth interventions, there is not consensus as to which components represent the "key ingredients" to support maximal engagement of youth. Further, successful intervention evaluation requires the ability to systematically track users' engagement with intervention components (i.e., paradata) to evaluate its effects on behavior change.

Methods: As part of the Adolescent Medicine Trials Network UNC/Emory Center for Innovative Technology (iTech) portfolio of HIV/AIDS Interventions, we present diverse strategies used across five mHealth protocols seeking to promote youth engagement, track and measure engagement through paradata, and incorporate these components into mHealth intervention evaluations.

Results: We describe the importance of defining and measuring engagement using case studies from iTech to illustrate how different research teams select mHealth features to promote youth engagement over time, taking into account features embedded in the technology design, key mechanisms of change and trial outcomes (e.g., HIV testing, pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake and adherence, HIV treatment adherence). Finally, we discuss how the research teams plan to evaluate engagement's role on their intervention's outcomes.

Conclusions: Based on this synthesis, we discuss strategies to enhance mHealth engagement during intervention development and design, ensure its monitoring and reporting throughout the trial, and evaluate its impact on trial outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让年轻人参与移动医疗:什么有效,我们如何确定?
背景:参与移动健康(mHealth)干预试验的青少年通常只是部分地使用这些技术[例如,应用程序(app)或移动优化网站],往往过早地完全停止使用。有限的参与可能会影响干预措施对行为改变的影响,并损害研究人员测试和估计其干预措施真正功效的能力。虽然移动医疗干预措施已被证明在不同的健康状况下对青年是可行和可接受的,但增加参与的战略却没有得到充分研究。具体而言,在艾滋病毒预防和护理移动保健干预措施中,对于哪些组成部分是支持青年最大程度参与的“关键成分”,尚未达成共识。此外,成功的干预评估需要有能力系统地跟踪用户对干预组件(即para)的参与,以评估其对行为改变的影响。方法:作为青少年医学试验网络UNC/埃默里创新技术中心(iTech)艾滋病毒/艾滋病干预组合的一部分,我们提出了五种移动健康协议中使用的不同策略,旨在促进青少年参与,通过范式跟踪和测量参与,并将这些组成部分纳入移动健康干预评估。结果:我们使用iTech的案例研究描述了定义和衡量参与的重要性,以说明不同的研究团队如何选择移动健康功能来促进青年参与,同时考虑到技术设计中嵌入的功能、关键变化机制和试验结果(例如,艾滋病毒检测、暴露前预防吸收和坚持、艾滋病毒治疗坚持)。最后,我们讨论了研究团队计划如何评估敬业度对其干预结果的作用。结论:基于这一综合,我们讨论了在干预措施开发和设计期间加强移动健康参与的策略,确保在整个试验过程中对其进行监测和报告,并评估其对试验结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring online health resources and self-care among irritable bowel syndrome patients: analyzing internet use and AI chatbot interactions. Not just a Barbie in hijab: participant perspectives on culturally tailoring a virtual health assistant for Bangladeshi immigrants in the US promoting colorectal cancer screening. Development, usability, and preliminary efficacy of a virtual reality experience to promote healthy lifestyle behaviors in children: pilot randomized controlled trial. Telehealth adoption for substance use and mental health disorders in Minnesota and North Dakota: a quasi-experimental study. Feasibility and reliability to assess the motor development of infants exposed to gestational COVID-19 using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale remotely.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1