The GLA:D BACK self-management adherence and competence checklist (SMAC Checklist)—Development, content validity and feasibility

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL British Journal of Health Psychology Pub Date : 2023-05-15 DOI:10.1111/bjhp.12668
Bibi Dige Heiberg, Inge Ris, Henrik Hein Lauridsen, Jan Hartvigsen, Corrie Myburgh, Alice Kongsted
{"title":"The GLA:D BACK self-management adherence and competence checklist (SMAC Checklist)—Development, content validity and feasibility","authors":"Bibi Dige Heiberg,&nbsp;Inge Ris,&nbsp;Henrik Hein Lauridsen,&nbsp;Jan Hartvigsen,&nbsp;Corrie Myburgh,&nbsp;Alice Kongsted","doi":"10.1111/bjhp.12668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To unpack the complexity and impact of self-management interventions targeting musculoskeletal health conditions, we need to learn more about treatment delivery in clinical settings. Fidelity evaluation can illuminate how complex treatments are delivered and help understand the elements that lead to the effect. The objective of this study was to develop a checklist for the evaluation of the clinicians’ delivery of structured patient education and exercise intervention for people with persistent back pain, the GLA:D Back intervention. The intent was to provide a checklist adaptable for the general delivery of self-management interventions for musculoskeletal pain.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We derived items for the treatment delivery fidelity checklist from behaviour change techniques and theory about communication style. We applied a three-step developmental process covering <i>developing a preliminary fidelity intervention framework</i>, <i>validating checklist content</i> and <i>piloting and refining the checklist.</i></p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We developed the adaptable fidelity checklist, The GLA:D BACK Self-management Adherence and Competence Checklist (SMAC Checklist). Evaluation of clinical practice using the checklist was feasible and acceptable by clinicians. Preliminary results indicate satisfactory observer agreement during pilot testing of the checklist.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The GLA:D BACK Self-management Adherence and Competence Checklist is a fidelity measurement tool for the assessment of the delivery of a self-management supportive intervention for people with persistent back pain. The intention is that it can be useful as an adaptable tool for use across self-management interventions for musculoskeletal pain.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48161,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjhp.12668","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12668","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To unpack the complexity and impact of self-management interventions targeting musculoskeletal health conditions, we need to learn more about treatment delivery in clinical settings. Fidelity evaluation can illuminate how complex treatments are delivered and help understand the elements that lead to the effect. The objective of this study was to develop a checklist for the evaluation of the clinicians’ delivery of structured patient education and exercise intervention for people with persistent back pain, the GLA:D Back intervention. The intent was to provide a checklist adaptable for the general delivery of self-management interventions for musculoskeletal pain.

Methods

We derived items for the treatment delivery fidelity checklist from behaviour change techniques and theory about communication style. We applied a three-step developmental process covering developing a preliminary fidelity intervention framework, validating checklist content and piloting and refining the checklist.

Results

We developed the adaptable fidelity checklist, The GLA:D BACK Self-management Adherence and Competence Checklist (SMAC Checklist). Evaluation of clinical practice using the checklist was feasible and acceptable by clinicians. Preliminary results indicate satisfactory observer agreement during pilot testing of the checklist.

Conclusion

The GLA:D BACK Self-management Adherence and Competence Checklist is a fidelity measurement tool for the assessment of the delivery of a self-management supportive intervention for people with persistent back pain. The intention is that it can be useful as an adaptable tool for use across self-management interventions for musculoskeletal pain.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GLA:D BACK自我管理依从性和能力检查表(SMAC检查表)——开发、内容有效性和可行性。
目的:为了揭示针对肌肉骨骼健康状况的自我管理干预措施的复杂性和影响,我们需要了解更多关于临床环境中治疗提供的信息。保真度评估可以阐明如何提供复杂的治疗,并有助于了解导致效果的因素。本研究的目的是制定一份检查表,用于评估临床医生为持续背痛患者提供的结构化患者教育和运动干预,即GLA:D背部干预。目的是提供一份适用于肌肉骨骼疼痛自我管理干预的一般实施的检查表。方法:我们从行为改变技术和沟通风格理论中推导出治疗交付忠诚度检查表的项目。我们采用了三步发展过程,包括制定初步的保真度干预框架、验证检查表内容以及试行和完善检查表。结果:我们制定了适应性忠诚度检查表,即GLA:D-BACK自我管理依从性和能力检查表(SMAC检查表)。使用检查表对临床实践进行评估是可行的,临床医生可以接受。初步结果表明,在检查表的试点测试期间,观察者达成了令人满意的一致意见。结论:GLA:D BACK自我管理依从性和能力检查表是一种保真度测量工具,用于评估持续背痛患者自我管理支持性干预的实施情况。其目的是,它可以作为一种适应性强的工具,用于肌肉骨骼疼痛的自我管理干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Health Psychology
British Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
1.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The focus of the British Journal of Health Psychology is to publish original research on various aspects of psychology that are related to health, health-related behavior, and illness throughout a person's life. The journal specifically seeks articles that are based on health psychology theory or discuss theoretical matters within the field.
期刊最新文献
Experienced facilitators and challenges of practising motivational interaction: How can pre-service physical education teachers adopt more motivational behaviours? A multiple behaviour temporal network analysis for health behaviours during COVID-19. Climate anxiety and its association with health behaviours and generalized anxiety: An intensive longitudinal study. Reducing information avoidance: The effectiveness of humour, cute animals and coping messages. A randomized feasibility trial evaluating the "My Changed Body" writing activity for people with endometriosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1