Physician utilization in prehospital emergency medical services in Europe: an overview and comparison.

Martin Rief, Daniel Auinger, Michael Eichinger, Gabriel Honnef, Gregor Alexander Schittek, Philipp Metnitz, Gerhard Prause, Philipp Zoidl, Paul Zajic
{"title":"Physician utilization in prehospital emergency medical services in Europe: an overview and comparison.","authors":"Martin Rief, Daniel Auinger, Michael Eichinger, Gabriel Honnef, Gregor Alexander Schittek, Philipp Metnitz, Gerhard Prause, Philipp Zoidl, Paul Zajic","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>National and regional systems for emergency medical care provision may differ greatly. We sought to determine whether or not physicians are utilized in prehospital care and to what extent they are present in differentEuropean countries.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We collected information on 32 European countries by reviewing publications and sending questionnaires to authors of relevant articles as well as to officials of ministries of health (or equivalent), representatives of national societies in emergency medicine, or well-known experts in the specialty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty of the 32 of European countries we studied (94%) employ physicians in prehospital emergency medical services. In 17 of the 32 (53%), general practitioners also participate in prehospital emergency care. Emergency system models were described as Franco-German in 27 countries (84%), as hybrid in 17 (53%), and as Anglo-American in 14 (44%). Multiple models were present simultaneously in 17 countries (53%). We were able to differentiate between national prehospital emergency systems with a novel classification based on tiers reflecting the degree of physician utilization in the countries. We also grouped the national systems by average population and area served.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are notable differences in system designs and intensity of physician utilization between different geographic areas, countries, and regions in Europe. Several archetypal models (Franco-German, hybrid, and Anglo- American) exist simultaneously across Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":11644,"journal":{"name":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","volume":"35 2","pages":"125-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: National and regional systems for emergency medical care provision may differ greatly. We sought to determine whether or not physicians are utilized in prehospital care and to what extent they are present in differentEuropean countries.

Material and methods: We collected information on 32 European countries by reviewing publications and sending questionnaires to authors of relevant articles as well as to officials of ministries of health (or equivalent), representatives of national societies in emergency medicine, or well-known experts in the specialty.

Results: Thirty of the 32 of European countries we studied (94%) employ physicians in prehospital emergency medical services. In 17 of the 32 (53%), general practitioners also participate in prehospital emergency care. Emergency system models were described as Franco-German in 27 countries (84%), as hybrid in 17 (53%), and as Anglo-American in 14 (44%). Multiple models were present simultaneously in 17 countries (53%). We were able to differentiate between national prehospital emergency systems with a novel classification based on tiers reflecting the degree of physician utilization in the countries. We also grouped the national systems by average population and area served.

Conclusion: There are notable differences in system designs and intensity of physician utilization between different geographic areas, countries, and regions in Europe. Several archetypal models (Franco-German, hybrid, and Anglo- American) exist simultaneously across Europe.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生在欧洲院前急救医疗服务中的应用:综述和比较。
目标:提供紧急医疗服务的国家和地区系统可能存在很大差异。我们试图确定医生是否被用于院前护理,以及他们在不同欧洲国家的存在程度。材料和方法:我们通过审查出版物并向相关文章的作者、卫生部(或同等机构)官员、国家急诊医学学会代表或该专业的知名专家发送问卷,收集了32个欧洲国家的信息。结果:在我们研究的32个欧洲国家中,有30个(94%)在院前急救医疗服务中雇佣了医生。在32人中的17人(53%)中,全科医生也参与了院前急救。27个国家(84%)的应急系统模型为法德模式,17个国家(53%)为混合模式,14个国家(44%)为英美模式。17个国家(53%)同时存在多种模型。我们能够通过一种新的分类来区分国家院前急救系统,该分类基于反映各国医生利用程度的等级。我们还按平均人口和服务地区对国家系统进行了分组。结论:欧洲不同地理区域、国家和地区在系统设计和医生使用强度方面存在显著差异。几个原型模型(法德混血儿和英美混血儿)同时存在于整个欧洲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A pioneering Spanish book on psychiatric emergencies from 1928, by César Juarros. Rapunzel syndrome in the emergency department. Complexity of care in the emergency department: Shall we treat the whole person to prevent revisits? Considerations regarding the use of the sex/gender variable in research: moving towards good practice. Progenders decalogue. We must be doing something right.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1