Construct validity and reliability of the participation scale (P-scale) in individuals with spinal cord injury.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-13 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2023.2183327
Patrícia Avelar Viana Espindula, Alessandra de Carvalho Bastone, Ana Paula Santos
{"title":"Construct validity and reliability of the participation scale (P-scale) in individuals with spinal cord injury.","authors":"Patrícia Avelar Viana Espindula, Alessandra de Carvalho Bastone, Ana Paula Santos","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2023.2183327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the reliability and the construct validity of the Participation Scale (P-scale) in adults with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>: SARAH Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals, Brazil.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>: One hundred individuals with SCI.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>: Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>: Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were investigated. To assess reliability the P-scale was applied twice with a one-week interval. To assess construct validity the Functional Independence Measure, the Beck Depression Inventory, and the Accessibility Perception Questionnaire were administered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the participants was 38.9 ± 12.80 years. The majority were male (70%) and had traumatic injuries (74%). The P-scale showed significant correlations with the Functional Independence Measure motor domain (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i> = -0.280) and cognitive domain (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i> = -0.520); with the Beck Depression Inventory score (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i><sub> </sub>= 0.610); with the Accessibility Perception Questionnaire displacement domain (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i><sub> </sub>= -0.620) and psycho-affective domain (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i><sub> </sub>= 0.530). Mean scores obtained on the P-scale differed significantly between the groups with and without depressive symptoms (<i>P</i> = 0.001), neuropathic pain (<i>P</i> = 0.033), and functional dependence (<i>P</i> = 0.001). There was no difference between the paraplegic and quadriplegic groups. The P-scale had adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.873), excellent test-retest reliability (ICC<sub>2,1 </sub>= 0.992; 95% CI = 0.987-0.994), and in the Bland-Altman plot analysis, only six values fell outside the limits of agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results support the use of the P-scale to assess the participation of individuals with SCI in research and clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"661-668"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378679/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2023.2183327","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the reliability and the construct validity of the Participation Scale (P-scale) in adults with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI).

Design: A cross-sectional study.

Setting: : SARAH Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals, Brazil.

Participants: : One hundred individuals with SCI.

Interventions: : Not applicable.

Outcome measures: : Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were investigated. To assess reliability the P-scale was applied twice with a one-week interval. To assess construct validity the Functional Independence Measure, the Beck Depression Inventory, and the Accessibility Perception Questionnaire were administered.

Results: The mean age of the participants was 38.9 ± 12.80 years. The majority were male (70%) and had traumatic injuries (74%). The P-scale showed significant correlations with the Functional Independence Measure motor domain (rs = -0.280) and cognitive domain (rs = -0.520); with the Beck Depression Inventory score (rs= 0.610); with the Accessibility Perception Questionnaire displacement domain (rs= -0.620) and psycho-affective domain (rs= 0.530). Mean scores obtained on the P-scale differed significantly between the groups with and without depressive symptoms (P = 0.001), neuropathic pain (P = 0.033), and functional dependence (P = 0.001). There was no difference between the paraplegic and quadriplegic groups. The P-scale had adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.873), excellent test-retest reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.992; 95% CI = 0.987-0.994), and in the Bland-Altman plot analysis, only six values fell outside the limits of agreement.

Conclusion: Our results support the use of the P-scale to assess the participation of individuals with SCI in research and clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓损伤患者参与量表(P-scale)的结构有效性和可靠性。
目的:研究脊髓损伤成人参与量表(P-scale)的信度和结构效度:调查脊髓损伤(SCI)成人参与量表(P-scale)的信度和结构效度:横断面研究:参与者: 100 名脊髓损伤患者:100 名 SCI 患者:结果测量调查社会人口学和临床特征。为评估可靠性,两次使用P量表,每次间隔一周。为了评估构建有效性,采用了功能独立性测量法、贝克抑郁量表和无障碍感知问卷:参与者的平均年龄为 38.9 ± 12.80 岁。大多数参与者为男性(70%),有外伤(74%)。P量表与功能独立性测量运动领域(rs = -0.280)和认知领域(rs = -0.520)、贝克抑郁量表得分(rs = 0.610)、无障碍感知问卷位移领域(rs = -0.620)和心理情感领域(rs = 0.530)呈显著相关。有抑郁症状组与无抑郁症状组(P = 0.001)、神经病理性疼痛组(P = 0.033)和功能依赖组(P = 0.001)的 P 量表平均得分差异显著。截瘫组和四肢瘫痪组之间没有差异。P 量表具有充分的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha = 0.873)和极好的测试-再测可靠性(ICC2,1 = 0.992; 95% CI = 0.987-0.994),在布兰-阿尔特曼图分析中,只有六个值超出了一致的范围:我们的研究结果支持使用 P 量表来评估 SCI 患者参与研究和临床实践的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
期刊最新文献
Embracing Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Access (IDEA): Cultivating understanding internally to foster external change. First report of a new exoskeleton in incomplete spinal cord injury: FreeGait®. Improving current understanding of cognitive impairment in patients with a spinal cord injury: A UK-based clinician survey. Shelter-in-place during the COVID-19 pandemic: Impact on secondary health conditions, anxiety, loneliness, social isolation, social connectedness, and positive affect and well-being. The association between locus of control and general mental health in patients with lumbar spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1