Applicants to a Special Education Advocacy Training Program: "Insiders" in the Disability Advocacy World.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1352/1934-9556-61.2.110
Brittney L Goscicki, Samantha E Goldman, Meghan M Burke, Robert M Hodapp
{"title":"Applicants to a Special Education Advocacy Training Program: \"Insiders\" in the Disability Advocacy World.","authors":"Brittney L Goscicki,&nbsp;Samantha E Goldman,&nbsp;Meghan M Burke,&nbsp;Robert M Hodapp","doi":"10.1352/1934-9556-61.2.110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although social groups have \"insiders,\" this construct has not been measured within the disability advocacy community. Examining 405 individuals who applied for an advocacy training program, this study examined the nature of insiderness within the disability advocacy community and ties to individual roles. Participants showed differences in mean ratings across 10 insider items. A principal components analysis revealed two distinct factors: Organizational Involvement and Social Connectedness. Non-school providers scored highest on Organizational Involvement; family members/self-advocates highest on Social Connectedness. Themes from open-ended responses supported the factors and showed differences in motivation and information sources across insiderness levels and roles. Qualitative analysis revealed two additional aspects of insiderness not addressed in the scale. Implications are discussed for future practice and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":47489,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-61.2.110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although social groups have "insiders," this construct has not been measured within the disability advocacy community. Examining 405 individuals who applied for an advocacy training program, this study examined the nature of insiderness within the disability advocacy community and ties to individual roles. Participants showed differences in mean ratings across 10 insider items. A principal components analysis revealed two distinct factors: Organizational Involvement and Social Connectedness. Non-school providers scored highest on Organizational Involvement; family members/self-advocates highest on Social Connectedness. Themes from open-ended responses supported the factors and showed differences in motivation and information sources across insiderness levels and roles. Qualitative analysis revealed two additional aspects of insiderness not addressed in the scale. Implications are discussed for future practice and research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特殊教育倡导培训项目申请者:残疾倡导界的“圈内人”。
虽然社会团体中有“圈内人”,但这种结构在残疾人倡导团体中尚未得到衡量。本研究考察了405名申请倡导培训项目的个人,考察了残疾人倡导团体内部的本质及其与个人角色的联系。参与者对10个内幕项目的平均评分存在差异。主成分分析揭示了两个不同的因素:组织参与和社会联系。非学校提供者在组织参与方面得分最高;家庭成员/自我倡导者的社会联系最高。开放式回答的主题支持这些因素,并显示了内在水平和角色在动机和信息来源方面的差异。定性分析揭示了量表中未涉及的内在性的另外两个方面。讨论了对未来实践和研究的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities is dedicated to meeting the information needs of those who seek effective ways to help people with mental retardation. The journal reports new teaching approaches, program developments, administrative tools, program evaluation, service utilization studies, community surveys, public policy issues, training and case studies, and current research in mental retardation. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities is a peer-reviewed journal whose consulting editors represent a broad spectrum of settings: universities, research centers, public and private residential care facilities, and specialized community service agencies.
期刊最新文献
"I Know How to Get Around Your 'No'": A Follow-Up of the FACES Psychoeducational Intervention. Capturing Staff Perspectives on Quality Interaction With Clients With Intellectual Disability: A Diary Study. Effect of a Nurses' Training Program on Early Detection of Egyptian Children With Developmental Disabilities in Assiut Governorate. Empowering Healthcare Professionals: Exploring Experiences Leading a Violence Prevention Course for Adults With Intellectual Disability. Preliminary Reliability and Validity of the Self-Determination Inventory: Student Report French Translation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1