What does One Health want? Feminist, posthuman, and anti-colonial possibilities.

Lauren E Van Patter, Julia Linares-Roake, Andrea V Breen
{"title":"What does One Health want? Feminist, posthuman, and anti-colonial possibilities.","authors":"Lauren E Van Patter,&nbsp;Julia Linares-Roake,&nbsp;Andrea V Breen","doi":"10.1186/s42522-022-00076-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>What does One Health want? Despite its touted interdisciplinarity, to date there has been limited engagement with the social sciences and humanities - in particular with streams of critical social theory that enable a response to this question. In this paper we draw on the critical social sciences to consider how One Health is defined, conceptualized, and positioned, and discuss what we see as vital challenges within One Health that both limit its potential for meaningful change and contribute to a potential for ongoing harm - namely, medicalization, anthropocentrism, and colonial-capitalism. We then advance three areas in the critical social sciences that hold potential for addressing these challenges - feminist, posthuman, and anti-colonial approaches. By doing so we seek to encourage a deeper transdisciplinarity within One Health - one that is open to a genuine engagement with insights from critical social theory and a re-orientation towards more creative and radical re-imaginings in the service of wellbeing for diverse peoples, animals, other beings, and the land.</p>","PeriodicalId":19490,"journal":{"name":"One Health Outlook","volume":"5 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9999592/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Health Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-022-00076-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

What does One Health want? Despite its touted interdisciplinarity, to date there has been limited engagement with the social sciences and humanities - in particular with streams of critical social theory that enable a response to this question. In this paper we draw on the critical social sciences to consider how One Health is defined, conceptualized, and positioned, and discuss what we see as vital challenges within One Health that both limit its potential for meaningful change and contribute to a potential for ongoing harm - namely, medicalization, anthropocentrism, and colonial-capitalism. We then advance three areas in the critical social sciences that hold potential for addressing these challenges - feminist, posthuman, and anti-colonial approaches. By doing so we seek to encourage a deeper transdisciplinarity within One Health - one that is open to a genuine engagement with insights from critical social theory and a re-orientation towards more creative and radical re-imaginings in the service of wellbeing for diverse peoples, animals, other beings, and the land.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合一健康想要什么?女权主义、后人类和反殖民主义的可能性。
合一健康想要什么?尽管它被吹捧为跨学科,但迄今为止,它与社会科学和人文科学的接触有限,特别是与能够回答这个问题的批判社会理论流的接触有限。在本文中,我们利用关键的社会科学来考虑如何定义、概念化和定位“一个健康”,并讨论我们认为“一个健康”面临的重大挑战,这些挑战既限制了其进行有意义变革的潜力,又导致了潜在的持续危害——即医疗化、人类中心主义和殖民资本主义。然后,我们提出了关键社会科学中有潜力解决这些挑战的三个领域——女权主义、后人类和反殖民方法。通过这样做,我们寻求在一个健康中鼓励更深层次的跨学科-一个开放的真正参与批判社会理论的见解,并重新定位于更有创造性和激进的重新想象,为不同的人,动物,其他生物和土地的福祉服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Global One Health post-graduate programmes: a review The impact of controlling diseases of significant global importance on greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production The One Health High-Level Expert Panel (OHHLEP) Drug resistance and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBLs) - producing Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas species from the views of one-health approach in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pillars for successful operationalization of one health as an ecosystem approach: experience from a human-animal interface in the Maasai steppe in Tanzania.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1