{"title":"Effects of Lens-Induced Astigmatism at Near and Far Distances.","authors":"Silvia Tavazzi, Natalia Vlasak, Fabrizio Zeri","doi":"10.2147/OPTO.S405472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate and compare the degradation of visual acuity (VA) in myopic presbyopes due to lens-induced astigmatism at near and at far distance.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Fourteen corrected myopic presbyopes were recruited. VA (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) was measured binocularly for different conditions of lens-induced astigmatism: cylindrical powers of -0.25, -0.50, -0.75, -1.00, -1.50, and -2.00 diopters (and positive spherical power of half the cylindrical power) with two axis orientations (with-the-rule WTR and against-the-rule ATR) were added to their optical correction. Measurements were carried out at far and near distance both in photopic and mesopic conditions, and for high and low contrast (HC/LC) stimuli. The paired Wilcoxon signed-rank statistics test was used to evaluate difference between conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The measured VA as a function of the lens-induced astigmatism was described by regression lines in all investigated experimental conditions. The angular coefficients (slopes) of these lines represent the VA degradation, ie, the variation in logMAR corresponding to the addition of 1.00 diopters of cylindrical power. In photopic HC conditions, the VA degradation is significantly more pronounced at far distance than at near distance (0.22±0.06 diopters<sup>-1</sup> vs 0.15±0.05 diopters<sup>-1</sup>, p = 0.0061 in WTR conditions; 0.18±0.06 diopters<sup>-1</sup> vs 0.12±0.05 diopters<sup>-1</sup>, p = 0.0017 in ATR conditions), although VAs at near and at far with zero cylinder were similar (-0.14±0.10 vs -0.14±0.08, p = 0.824).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The better tolerance to lens-induced astigmatism blur at near than at far distance in photopic conditions with HC stimuli is tentatively attributed to a possible experience-mediated neural compensation associated to the tendency of the eye toward an inherent astigmatism at near.</p>","PeriodicalId":43701,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Optometry","volume":"15 ","pages":"105-117"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ba/42/opto-15-105.PMC10171221.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S405472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate and compare the degradation of visual acuity (VA) in myopic presbyopes due to lens-induced astigmatism at near and at far distance.
Patients and methods: Fourteen corrected myopic presbyopes were recruited. VA (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) was measured binocularly for different conditions of lens-induced astigmatism: cylindrical powers of -0.25, -0.50, -0.75, -1.00, -1.50, and -2.00 diopters (and positive spherical power of half the cylindrical power) with two axis orientations (with-the-rule WTR and against-the-rule ATR) were added to their optical correction. Measurements were carried out at far and near distance both in photopic and mesopic conditions, and for high and low contrast (HC/LC) stimuli. The paired Wilcoxon signed-rank statistics test was used to evaluate difference between conditions.
Results: The measured VA as a function of the lens-induced astigmatism was described by regression lines in all investigated experimental conditions. The angular coefficients (slopes) of these lines represent the VA degradation, ie, the variation in logMAR corresponding to the addition of 1.00 diopters of cylindrical power. In photopic HC conditions, the VA degradation is significantly more pronounced at far distance than at near distance (0.22±0.06 diopters-1 vs 0.15±0.05 diopters-1, p = 0.0061 in WTR conditions; 0.18±0.06 diopters-1 vs 0.12±0.05 diopters-1, p = 0.0017 in ATR conditions), although VAs at near and at far with zero cylinder were similar (-0.14±0.10 vs -0.14±0.08, p = 0.824).
Conclusion: The better tolerance to lens-induced astigmatism blur at near than at far distance in photopic conditions with HC stimuli is tentatively attributed to a possible experience-mediated neural compensation associated to the tendency of the eye toward an inherent astigmatism at near.
目的:探讨和比较近视老花眼晶状体引起的近、远距离散光对视力的影响。患者和方法:选取矫正近视老花眼14例。在不同的透镜引起的像散条件下,用双目测量了最小分辨角的对数VA(最小分辨角的对数):在光学校正中加入两轴方向(顺时针方向的WTR和反时针方向的ATR)的-0.25、-0.50、-0.75、-1.00、-1.50和-2.00屈光度的柱面倍率(正球面倍率为柱面倍率的一半)。测量进行了远和近距离,在光和介观条件下,并为高和低对比度(HC/LC)刺激。采用配对的Wilcoxon符号秩统计检验来评价条件间的差异。结果:在所有实验条件下,视差随透镜散光的变化均用回归线描述。这些线的角系数(斜率)表示VA的退化,即logMAR的变化对应于增加1.00屈光度的圆柱形功率。在光敏HC条件下,VA的降解远比近明显(0.22±0.06 diopters-1 vs 0.15±0.05 diopters-1, p = 0.0061);ATR条件下0.18±0.06 diopters-1 vs 0.12±0.05 diopters-1, p = 0.0017),尽管零柱近、远VAs相似(-0.14±0.10 vs -0.14±0.08,p = 0.824)。结论:在HC刺激的光性条件下,对晶状体引起的近距离散光模糊比远距离散光模糊的耐受性更好,初步归因于一种可能的经验介导的神经代偿,这种代偿与眼睛在近距离产生固有散光的倾向有关。
期刊介绍:
Clinical Optometry is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on clinical optometry. All aspects of patient care are addressed within the journal as well as the practice of optometry including economic and business analyses. Basic and clinical research papers are published that cover all aspects of optics, refraction and its application to the theory and practice of optometry. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Theoretical and applied optics, Delivery of patient care in optometry practice, Refraction and correction of errors, Screening and preventative aspects of eye disease, Extended clinical roles for optometrists including shared care and provision of medications, Teaching and training optometrists, International aspects of optometry, Business practice, Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction, Health economic evaluations.