Effect of Acidic Solutions on the Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Indirect Restorative Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International Journal of Prosthodontics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.11607/ijp.7463
Hui Yang, Song Yang, Thomas Attin, Hao Yu
{"title":"Effect of Acidic Solutions on the Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Indirect Restorative Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Hui Yang,&nbsp;Song Yang,&nbsp;Thomas Attin,&nbsp;Hao Yu","doi":"10.11607/ijp.7463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effects of acidic solutions on the surface roughness (SR) and surface microhardness (SMH) of indirect restorative materials by analyzing in vivo and in vitro studies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Studies comparing the SR and SMH of indirect restorative materials after erosion were included in the meta-analysis. Meta-analyses were conducted with a random-effects model at a significance level of P < .05 using Review Manager software (Cochrane Collaboration). The literature search was conducted using Web of Science, MEDLINE (PubMed), and the Cochrane Library, with no limitations on publication year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,097 potentially relevant studies, 32 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. A total of 16 articles were included in the systematic review, and 15 were included in the meta-analyses. The kappa score between the two reviewers was 0.80. The effects of erosion on ceramics, indirect composites, and hybrid ceramics were evaluated by immersion in or rinsing with acidic solutions (eg, hydrochloric acid [HCl], cola drinks, and juices). An increase in the SR (Ra values) (P < .00001; mean difference [MD] = -0.04; 95% CI = -0.06 to -0.03) and a decrease in the SMH (Vickers microhardness) (P < .00001; MD = 13.94; 95% CI = 12.33 to 15.55) were found after erosion. Subgroup analyses revealed that in vitro erosion led to significantly higher Ra values and lower VHN values than in vivo erosion; cola drinks and juices led to more surface degradation than HCl; and the SR and SMH of polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) materials remained unchanged after erosion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After acidic challenges, a significantly rougher and softened surface was found for indirect restorative materials. Among all the indirect restorative materials, PICN showed the best acid resistance. Nevertheless, the changes in the SR and SMH of indirect restorative materials after erosion detected in the present study were minor and may not have any clinical significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50292,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Prosthodontics","volume":"36 1","pages":"81–90"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7463","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of acidic solutions on the surface roughness (SR) and surface microhardness (SMH) of indirect restorative materials by analyzing in vivo and in vitro studies.

Materials and methods: Studies comparing the SR and SMH of indirect restorative materials after erosion were included in the meta-analysis. Meta-analyses were conducted with a random-effects model at a significance level of P < .05 using Review Manager software (Cochrane Collaboration). The literature search was conducted using Web of Science, MEDLINE (PubMed), and the Cochrane Library, with no limitations on publication year.

Results: Of the 1,097 potentially relevant studies, 32 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. A total of 16 articles were included in the systematic review, and 15 were included in the meta-analyses. The kappa score between the two reviewers was 0.80. The effects of erosion on ceramics, indirect composites, and hybrid ceramics were evaluated by immersion in or rinsing with acidic solutions (eg, hydrochloric acid [HCl], cola drinks, and juices). An increase in the SR (Ra values) (P < .00001; mean difference [MD] = -0.04; 95% CI = -0.06 to -0.03) and a decrease in the SMH (Vickers microhardness) (P < .00001; MD = 13.94; 95% CI = 12.33 to 15.55) were found after erosion. Subgroup analyses revealed that in vitro erosion led to significantly higher Ra values and lower VHN values than in vivo erosion; cola drinks and juices led to more surface degradation than HCl; and the SR and SMH of polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) materials remained unchanged after erosion.

Conclusion: After acidic challenges, a significantly rougher and softened surface was found for indirect restorative materials. Among all the indirect restorative materials, PICN showed the best acid resistance. Nevertheless, the changes in the SR and SMH of indirect restorative materials after erosion detected in the present study were minor and may not have any clinical significance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
酸性溶液对间接修复材料表面粗糙度和显微硬度的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析
目的:通过体内外实验分析,评价酸性溶液对间接修复材料表面粗糙度(SR)和表面显微硬度(SMH)的影响。材料和方法:荟萃分析包括比较侵蚀后间接修复材料的SR和SMH的研究。使用Review Manager软件(Cochrane Collaboration),采用显著性水平为P<.05的随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。文献检索使用Web of Science、MEDLINE(PubMed)和Cochrane图书馆进行,不受出版年份的限制。结果:在1097项潜在相关研究中,32篇全文文章被评估为合格。共有16篇文章被纳入系统综述,15篇被纳入荟萃分析。两位评审员之间的kappa评分为0.80。侵蚀对陶瓷、间接复合材料和混合陶瓷的影响通过浸入酸性溶液(如盐酸[HCl]、可乐饮料和果汁)或用酸性溶液漂洗来评估。侵蚀后,SR(Ra值)增加(P<.00001;平均差[MD]=0.04;95%CI=0.06至-0.03),SMH(维氏显微硬度)降低(P<0.00001;MD=13.94;95%CI=12.33至15.55)。亚组分析显示,体外侵蚀导致比体内侵蚀显著更高的Ra值和更低的VHN值;可乐饮料和果汁比盐酸导致更多的表面降解;聚合物渗透陶瓷网络(PICN)材料的SR和SMH在侵蚀后保持不变。结论:在酸性激发后,发现间接修复材料的表面明显粗糙和软化。在所有的间接修复材料中,PICN表现出最好的耐酸性。然而,在本研究中检测到的侵蚀后间接修复材料的SR和SMH的变化很小,可能没有任何临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Prosthodontics
International Journal of Prosthodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Association for Osseointegration (EAO), the International College of Prosthodontists (ICP), the German Society of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science (DGPro), and the Italian Academy of Prosthetic Dentistry (AIOP) Prosthodontics demands a clinical research emphasis on patient- and dentist-mediated concerns in the management of oral rehabilitation needs. It is about making and implementing the best clinical decisions to enhance patients'' quality of life via applied biologic architecture - a role that far exceeds that of traditional prosthetic dentistry, with its emphasis on materials and techniques. The International Journal of Prosthodontics is dedicated to exploring and developing this conceptual shift in the role of today''s prosthodontist, clinician, and educator alike. The editorial board is composed of a distinguished team of leading international scholars.
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Abutment Screw Loosening in 24-Degree Angulation-Correcting and Straight Implants: An In Vitro Study. Analysis of Topography, Flexural Strength, and Microstructure of a Lithium Disilicate Glass- Ceramic after Surface Finishing. Aging and Fracture Resistance of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Molar Crowns Fabricated from Lithium Disilicate Containing Virgilite. Comparison Between Interocclusal Registration Using Silicone Bite Registration Material and Intraoral Scanner on Clenching Strength. Satisfaction with Labial Reinforcement of Custom-Made Mouthguards Among a Cohort of Rugby Union Players: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1