The Conometric Concept: Definitive Rehabilitation of a Single Posterior Implant Using a Friction Retention Abutment. A 1-year Follow-up Report

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International Journal of Prosthodontics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.11607/ijp.7369
Marco Degidi, Diego Nardi, Gianluca Sighinolfi, Davide Degidi, Adriano Piattelli
{"title":"The Conometric Concept: Definitive Rehabilitation of a Single Posterior Implant Using a Friction Retention Abutment. A 1-year Follow-up Report","authors":"Marco Degidi,&nbsp;Diego Nardi,&nbsp;Gianluca Sighinolfi,&nbsp;Davide Degidi,&nbsp;Adriano Piattelli","doi":"10.11607/ijp.7369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To provide a 1-year assessment of friction-retention abutments (Acuris, Dentsply Sirona) used to retain a single lithium disilicate (LS<sub>2</sub>) monolithic restoration.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 522 implants were placed to treat single-tooth premolar and molar edentulous sites in the mandible or maxilla. Three types of implants were used. The tested abutments were connected 3 months after implant placement. A single pressed LS<sub>2</sub> monolithic restoration was cemented to a dedicated titanium cap and engaged to the abutment without the use of screws or cement. Any complications affecting the restoration or the opposing dentition, soft tissue dimensional changes, the distance between the implant platform and the bone peak, and pocket probing depths were recorded at the time of restoration placement (T0), after 6 months of function (T1), and after 1 year of function (T2). Esthetic, functional, and biologic parameters were recorded at T0 and T2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 507 patients (284 women and 223 men) received a restoration (T0), and 504 of them reached the T2 1-year follow-up. One restoration fractured after 10 months in function. No statistically significant difference was assessed in the soft tissue measurements or in the measurements of the distance between the supporting implant platform and the bone peak. None of the restorations detached during the observation period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The friction retention abutment is a viable option to retain an implant-supported monolithic LS<sub>2</sub> glass-ceramic restoration in cases of premolar or molar single-tooth edentulism.</p>","PeriodicalId":50292,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Prosthodontics","volume":"36 1","pages":"104–112"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7369","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To provide a 1-year assessment of friction-retention abutments (Acuris, Dentsply Sirona) used to retain a single lithium disilicate (LS2) monolithic restoration.

Materials and methods: A total of 522 implants were placed to treat single-tooth premolar and molar edentulous sites in the mandible or maxilla. Three types of implants were used. The tested abutments were connected 3 months after implant placement. A single pressed LS2 monolithic restoration was cemented to a dedicated titanium cap and engaged to the abutment without the use of screws or cement. Any complications affecting the restoration or the opposing dentition, soft tissue dimensional changes, the distance between the implant platform and the bone peak, and pocket probing depths were recorded at the time of restoration placement (T0), after 6 months of function (T1), and after 1 year of function (T2). Esthetic, functional, and biologic parameters were recorded at T0 and T2.

Results: A total of 507 patients (284 women and 223 men) received a restoration (T0), and 504 of them reached the T2 1-year follow-up. One restoration fractured after 10 months in function. No statistically significant difference was assessed in the soft tissue measurements or in the measurements of the distance between the supporting implant platform and the bone peak. None of the restorations detached during the observation period.

Conclusion: The friction retention abutment is a viable option to retain an implant-supported monolithic LS2 glass-ceramic restoration in cases of premolar or molar single-tooth edentulism.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conmetric概念:使用摩擦保留基台的单个后植入物的最终康复。一年随访报告
目的:对用于保留单个二硅酸锂(LS2)整体修复体的摩擦保留基牙(Acuris,Dentsply Sirona)进行1年评估。材料和方法:共植入522个种植体,用于治疗下颌骨或上颌骨的单牙前磨牙和磨牙缺牙部位。使用了三种类型的植入物。测试的基牙在植入后3个月连接。在不使用螺钉或水泥的情况下,将单一压制的LS2整体修复体粘合到专用钛帽上,并接合到基牙上。在修复体放置时(T0)、功能6个月后(T1)和功能1年后(T2),记录影响修复体或相对牙列的任何并发症、软组织尺寸变化、植入物平台和骨峰之间的距离以及袋探深度。在T0和T2记录美学、功能和生物学参数。结果:共有507名患者(284名女性和223名男性)接受了修复(T0),其中504人达到了T2 1年随访。一个修复体在功能恢复10个月后骨折。在软组织测量或支撑植入物平台和骨峰之间的距离测量中没有评估出统计学上的显著差异。在观察期间,没有任何修复体脱落。结论:在前磨牙或磨牙单牙缺牙的情况下,摩擦固位基牙是一种可行的选择,可以保留种植体支持的LS2单片玻璃陶瓷修复体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Prosthodontics
International Journal of Prosthodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Association for Osseointegration (EAO), the International College of Prosthodontists (ICP), the German Society of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science (DGPro), and the Italian Academy of Prosthetic Dentistry (AIOP) Prosthodontics demands a clinical research emphasis on patient- and dentist-mediated concerns in the management of oral rehabilitation needs. It is about making and implementing the best clinical decisions to enhance patients'' quality of life via applied biologic architecture - a role that far exceeds that of traditional prosthetic dentistry, with its emphasis on materials and techniques. The International Journal of Prosthodontics is dedicated to exploring and developing this conceptual shift in the role of today''s prosthodontist, clinician, and educator alike. The editorial board is composed of a distinguished team of leading international scholars.
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Abutment Screw Loosening in 24-Degree Angulation-Correcting and Straight Implants: An In Vitro Study. Analysis of Topography, Flexural Strength, and Microstructure of a Lithium Disilicate Glass- Ceramic after Surface Finishing. Aging and Fracture Resistance of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Molar Crowns Fabricated from Lithium Disilicate Containing Virgilite. Comparison Between Interocclusal Registration Using Silicone Bite Registration Material and Intraoral Scanner on Clenching Strength. Satisfaction with Labial Reinforcement of Custom-Made Mouthguards Among a Cohort of Rugby Union Players: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1