Salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: functional outcomes in the LAPPRO trial after 8-year follow-up.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Scandinavian Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2023-05-11 DOI:10.2340/sju.v58.7318
Stefan Carlsson, David Bock, Anna Lantz, Eva Angenete, Katarina Koss Modig, Jonas Hugosson, Anders Bjartell, Gunnar Steineck, Peter Wiklund, Eva Haglind
{"title":"Salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: functional outcomes in the LAPPRO trial after 8-year follow-up.","authors":"Stefan Carlsson,&nbsp;David Bock,&nbsp;Anna Lantz,&nbsp;Eva Angenete,&nbsp;Katarina Koss Modig,&nbsp;Jonas Hugosson,&nbsp;Anders Bjartell,&nbsp;Gunnar Steineck,&nbsp;Peter Wiklund,&nbsp;Eva Haglind","doi":"10.2340/sju.v58.7318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Radical prostatectomy reduces mortality among patients with localized prostate cancer, however up to 35% of patients will experience biochemical recurrence, often treated with salvage radiotherapy. The objective of the study was to investigate long-term effects of salvage radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, controlled, non-randomized trial at 14 Swedish center's including 4,003 patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy 2008-2011. A target trial emulation approach was used to identify eligible patients that was treated with salvage radiotherapy. The control group received no salvage radiotherapy. Outcomes were assessed by patient questionnaires on ordinal scales and statistical group comparisons were made using ordered logit regression with adjustment for baseline outcome and confounding factors. The primary endpoints were bowel, urinary and sexual function and bothering due to dysfunction at 8 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven percent (330/3,139) of the analyzed study population received salvage radiotherapy. Fecal leakage, leakage of mucus and hematochezia were more common after receiving salvage radiotherapy compared with the control group; 4.5% versus 2.6% odds ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]): (1.90 [1.38; 2.62]), 6.8% versus 1.5% 4.14 (2.98; 5.76) and 8.6% versus 1.2% 4.14 (2.98; 5.76), respectively. Urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction and hematuria were more common after receiving salvage radiotherapy, 34% versus 23% 2.23 (2.65; 3.00), 65% versus 57% 1.65 (1.18; 2.29) and 16% versus 1.6% 11.17 (5.68; 21.99), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Salvage radiotherapy was associated with increased risk for fecal leakage, hematochezia, urinary incontinence and hematuria. Our results emphasize the importance of selecting patients for salvage radiotherapy to avoid overtreatment and to give high quality pre-treatment information to ensure patients' preparedness for late side-effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":21542,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology","volume":"58 ","pages":"11-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/sju.v58.7318","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: Radical prostatectomy reduces mortality among patients with localized prostate cancer, however up to 35% of patients will experience biochemical recurrence, often treated with salvage radiotherapy. The objective of the study was to investigate long-term effects of salvage radiotherapy.

Methods: A prospective, controlled, non-randomized trial at 14 Swedish center's including 4,003 patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy 2008-2011. A target trial emulation approach was used to identify eligible patients that was treated with salvage radiotherapy. The control group received no salvage radiotherapy. Outcomes were assessed by patient questionnaires on ordinal scales and statistical group comparisons were made using ordered logit regression with adjustment for baseline outcome and confounding factors. The primary endpoints were bowel, urinary and sexual function and bothering due to dysfunction at 8 years.

Results: Eleven percent (330/3,139) of the analyzed study population received salvage radiotherapy. Fecal leakage, leakage of mucus and hematochezia were more common after receiving salvage radiotherapy compared with the control group; 4.5% versus 2.6% odds ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]): (1.90 [1.38; 2.62]), 6.8% versus 1.5% 4.14 (2.98; 5.76) and 8.6% versus 1.2% 4.14 (2.98; 5.76), respectively. Urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction and hematuria were more common after receiving salvage radiotherapy, 34% versus 23% 2.23 (2.65; 3.00), 65% versus 57% 1.65 (1.18; 2.29) and 16% versus 1.6% 11.17 (5.68; 21.99), respectively.

Conclusion: Salvage radiotherapy was associated with increased risk for fecal leakage, hematochezia, urinary incontinence and hematuria. Our results emphasize the importance of selecting patients for salvage radiotherapy to avoid overtreatment and to give high quality pre-treatment information to ensure patients' preparedness for late side-effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根治性前列腺切除术后的补救性放疗:8年随访后LAPPRO试验的功能结局。
目的:根治性前列腺切除术降低了局限性前列腺癌患者的死亡率,但高达35%的患者会经历生化复发,通常采用补救性放疗治疗。本研究的目的是探讨补救性放射治疗的长期效果。方法:一项前瞻性、对照、非随机试验,在14个瑞典中心进行,包括4003名计划于2008-2011年进行根治性前列腺切除术的患者。目标试验模拟方法用于确定接受补救性放射治疗的合格患者。对照组不进行补救性放疗。结果通过顺序量表的患者问卷进行评估,并使用有序logit回归进行统计组比较,调整基线结果和混杂因素。主要终点为8岁时的肠道、泌尿和性功能以及因功能障碍引起的困扰。结果:11%(330/ 3139)的分析研究人群接受了补救性放疗。补救性放疗后大便漏、粘液漏、便血较对照组多见;4.5%对2.6%的优势比(95%可信区间[CI]):(1.90 [1.38;2.62]), 6.8%对1.5% 4.14 (2.98;5.76)和8.6%对1.2% 4.14 (2.98;分别为5.76)。接受补救性放疗后尿失禁、勃起功能障碍和血尿更为常见,分别为34%和23% (2.23;3.00), 65% vs 57% 1.65 (1.18;2.29)和1.6%对11.17 (5.68;分别为21.99)。结论:补救性放疗与粪漏、便血、尿失禁、血尿风险增加有关。我们的研究结果强调了选择患者进行补救性放疗的重要性,以避免过度治疗,并提供高质量的治疗前信息,以确保患者对晚期副作用做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Urology
Scandinavian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Urology is a journal for the clinical urologist and publishes papers within all fields in clinical urology. Experimental papers related to clinical questions are also invited.Important reports with great news value are published promptly.
期刊最新文献
The difficulty of studying the association between pathway delays and survival in cancer - an example from bladder cancer. The Stockholm Spinal Cord Uro Study: Changing patterns of urological surgery in a regional prevalence group through 50 years - Outcomes and lessons learned. Thermo-expandable intraprostatic nitinol stents in the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction: a consecutive case series. Evaluation of data quality in the Swedish National Penile Cancer Register. Study design and procedures in the incontinence post robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: anatomical and functional causes (IPA) - a prospective observational clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1