Dementia Incidence Rate Before and After Implementing the National Responsibility Policy for Dementia Care in Patients With Vascular Risk Factors in Korea.

Dementia and neurocognitive disorders Pub Date : 2023-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-14 DOI:10.12779/dnd.2023.22.2.49
Gihwan Byeon, Sung Ok Kwon, JinHyeong Jhoo, Jae-Won Jang, Yeshin Kim
{"title":"Dementia Incidence Rate Before and After Implementing the National Responsibility Policy for Dementia Care in Patients With Vascular Risk Factors in Korea.","authors":"Gihwan Byeon,&nbsp;Sung Ok Kwon,&nbsp;JinHyeong Jhoo,&nbsp;Jae-Won Jang,&nbsp;Yeshin Kim","doi":"10.12779/dnd.2023.22.2.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The National Responsibility Policy for Dementia Care was implemented in September 2017 in Korea. This study aimed to compare dementia incidence in Seoul and Gangwon-do before and after the implementation of this policy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted insurance claim data from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service for people diagnosed with diabetes, hypertension, or dyslipidemia for the first time in Seoul and Gangwon-do, Korea. We defined two enrollment groups based on the policy implementation date: 1) January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2016 (Index 1, pre-implementation), and 2) January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018 (Index 2, post-implementation). Each group was followed up for 1 year from the time of enrollment. Then, we calculated hazard ratios to compare the incidence of dementia between the two groups, and between Seoul and Gangwon-do.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Seoul, the incidence of dementia was significantly lower in Index 2 than in Index 1 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.926; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.875-0.979). However, the incidence rate did not differ between the 2 groups (HR, 1.113; 95% CI, 0.966-1.281) in Gangwon-do. In Index 1, the incidence of dementia did not differ between Seoul and Gangwon-do (HR, 1.043; 95% CI, 0.941-1.156), but in Index 2, was significantly higher in Gangwon-do than in Seoul (HR, 1.240; 95% CI, 1.109-1.386).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After implementing the National Responsibility Policy for Dementia Care, the dementia incidence rate decreased significantly in Seoul, consistent with other studies, but not in Gangwon-do.</p>","PeriodicalId":72779,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and neurocognitive disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3d/30/dnd-22-49.PMC10166674.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and neurocognitive disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12779/dnd.2023.22.2.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: The National Responsibility Policy for Dementia Care was implemented in September 2017 in Korea. This study aimed to compare dementia incidence in Seoul and Gangwon-do before and after the implementation of this policy.

Methods: We extracted insurance claim data from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service for people diagnosed with diabetes, hypertension, or dyslipidemia for the first time in Seoul and Gangwon-do, Korea. We defined two enrollment groups based on the policy implementation date: 1) January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2016 (Index 1, pre-implementation), and 2) January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018 (Index 2, post-implementation). Each group was followed up for 1 year from the time of enrollment. Then, we calculated hazard ratios to compare the incidence of dementia between the two groups, and between Seoul and Gangwon-do.

Results: In Seoul, the incidence of dementia was significantly lower in Index 2 than in Index 1 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.926; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.875-0.979). However, the incidence rate did not differ between the 2 groups (HR, 1.113; 95% CI, 0.966-1.281) in Gangwon-do. In Index 1, the incidence of dementia did not differ between Seoul and Gangwon-do (HR, 1.043; 95% CI, 0.941-1.156), but in Index 2, was significantly higher in Gangwon-do than in Seoul (HR, 1.240; 95% CI, 1.109-1.386).

Conclusions: After implementing the National Responsibility Policy for Dementia Care, the dementia incidence rate decreased significantly in Seoul, consistent with other studies, but not in Gangwon-do.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国实施血管危险因素患者痴呆症护理国家责任政策前后的痴呆症发病率。
背景和目的:国家痴呆症护理责任政策于2017年9月在韩国实施。本研究旨在比较该政策实施前后首尔和江原道的痴呆症发病率。方法:我们从韩国健康保险审查和评估服务中心提取了在韩国首尔和江原道首次诊断为糖尿病、高血压或血脂异常的人的保险索赔数据。我们根据政策实施日期定义了两个招生组:1)2015年1月1日至2016年12月31日(指标1,实施前);2)2017年1月31日至2018年12月30日(指标2,实施后)。每组从入组时起随访1年。然后,我们计算了风险比,以比较两组之间以及首尔和江原道之间的痴呆症发病率。结果:在首尔,指数2的痴呆症发病率显著低于指数1(危险比[HR],0.926;95%置信区间[CI],0.875-0.979)。然而,江原道两组的发病率没有差异(HR,1.113;95%CI,0.966-1.281)。在指数1中,首尔和江原道的痴呆症发病率没有差异(HR,1.043;95%CI,0.941-1.156),但在指数2中,江原道显著高于首尔(HR,1.240;95%CI为1.109-1.386),但江原道没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Item Characteristics and Test Information Between the K-MMSE~2:SV and K-MMSE. Assessing the Impact of Defacing Algorithms on Brain Volumetry Accuracy in MRI Analyses. Discriminative Power of Seoul Cognitive Status Test in Differentiating Subjective Cognitive Decline, Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Dementia Based on CERAD-K Standards. Shunt-Responsive Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Patient With Parkinson's Disease-Compatible Findings on Dopamine Transporter Scans. Speech Emotion Recognition in People at High Risk of Dementia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1