Interprofessional professionalism as a motivating force in interprofessional collaboration.

Fatemeh Keshmiri, Azam Hosseinpour
{"title":"Interprofessional professionalism as a motivating force in interprofessional collaboration.","authors":"Fatemeh Keshmiri,&nbsp;Azam Hosseinpour","doi":"10.18502/jmehm.v15i8.11050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Professionalism has been recognized as an essential component of inter-professional collaboration (IPC), and hence this study aimed at exploring elements of inter-professional professionalism (IPP) affecting IPC among surgery teams.  This qualitative study had been conducted from 2019 to 2021. Fifteen participants in surgery teams including surgeons, anesthesia nursing, and surgical technology nursing at hospitals of Shahid Sadoughi University were contributed to this study. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed through inductive content analysis, an approach introduced by Lundman and Graneheim. Data analysis process included the following: (<i>i</i>) Developing verbatim transcription of interview, (<i>ii</i>) Extracting semantic units and classifying them under the top compact unit, (<i>iii</i>) Summarizing and classifying the compact units and selecting appropriate labels for them, and (<i>iv</i>) Sorting subcategories according to their similarities and differences. Two hundreds and forty-two codes, five sub-categories, two categories, and a theme entitled \"reciprocal accountability in IPP\" were extracted. The barrier category was named \"weakness in accountability to team-based values\" and the facilitator category was called \"responsibility of maintaining empathetic relationship within the IP team\". Development of IPP and professional values (e.g., altruism, empathetic communication, and accountability to individual's and team's roles) can facilitate collaborative processes among different professions.</p>","PeriodicalId":45276,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8c/6e/JMEHM-15-8.PMC10151728.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jmehm.v15i8.11050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Professionalism has been recognized as an essential component of inter-professional collaboration (IPC), and hence this study aimed at exploring elements of inter-professional professionalism (IPP) affecting IPC among surgery teams.  This qualitative study had been conducted from 2019 to 2021. Fifteen participants in surgery teams including surgeons, anesthesia nursing, and surgical technology nursing at hospitals of Shahid Sadoughi University were contributed to this study. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed through inductive content analysis, an approach introduced by Lundman and Graneheim. Data analysis process included the following: (i) Developing verbatim transcription of interview, (ii) Extracting semantic units and classifying them under the top compact unit, (iii) Summarizing and classifying the compact units and selecting appropriate labels for them, and (iv) Sorting subcategories according to their similarities and differences. Two hundreds and forty-two codes, five sub-categories, two categories, and a theme entitled "reciprocal accountability in IPP" were extracted. The barrier category was named "weakness in accountability to team-based values" and the facilitator category was called "responsibility of maintaining empathetic relationship within the IP team". Development of IPP and professional values (e.g., altruism, empathetic communication, and accountability to individual's and team's roles) can facilitate collaborative processes among different professions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨专业的专业精神是跨专业合作的动力。
专业精神被认为是跨专业合作(IPC)的重要组成部分,因此本研究旨在探讨影响手术团队跨专业合作(IPP)的因素。该定性研究于2019年至2021年进行。沙希德·萨杜吉大学附属医院的外科团队包括外科医生、麻醉护理和外科技术护理共15名参与者。数据通过半结构化访谈收集,并通过归纳内容分析进行分析,归纳内容分析是Lundman和Graneheim引入的方法。数据分析过程包括:(i)逐字抄写采访;(ii)提取语义单位并在顶部紧凑单位下分类;(iii)对紧凑单位进行总结和分类并为其选择适当的标签;(iv)根据其相似性和差异对子类别进行排序。抽取了242项守则、5个子类别、2个类别和题为“IPP中的相互问责制”的主题。障碍类别被称为“对团队价值观的问责不足”,促进因素类别被称为“在IP团队中保持同理心关系的责任”。IPP和专业价值观(如利他主义、共情沟通和对个人和团队角色的责任)的发展可以促进不同专业之间的合作过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ethical issues experienced by otolaryngologists: a conventional content analysis. Evaluation of medical sciences students' awareness of the patients' rights charter: a cross-sectional study. Examining the criteria of human dignity. Moral distress and moral courage among Iraqi nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the nursing moral disengagement scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1