Effectiveness of pharmacologic interventions for prevention of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome following bypass surgery.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain Circulation Pub Date : 2022-12-06 eCollection Date: 2022-10-01 DOI:10.4103/bc.bc_43_22
Georgios P Skandalakis, Aristotelis Kalyvas, Evgenia Lani, Spyridon Komaitis, Danai Manolakou, Despoina Chatzopoulou, Nikos Pantazis, Georgios A Zenonos, Constantinos G Hadjipanayis, George Stranjalis, Christos Koutsarnakis
{"title":"Effectiveness of pharmacologic interventions for prevention of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome following bypass surgery.","authors":"Georgios P Skandalakis,&nbsp;Aristotelis Kalyvas,&nbsp;Evgenia Lani,&nbsp;Spyridon Komaitis,&nbsp;Danai Manolakou,&nbsp;Despoina Chatzopoulou,&nbsp;Nikos Pantazis,&nbsp;Georgios A Zenonos,&nbsp;Constantinos G Hadjipanayis,&nbsp;George Stranjalis,&nbsp;Christos Koutsarnakis","doi":"10.4103/bc.bc_43_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) following bypass surgery is a major cause of neurological morbidity and mortality. However, data regarding its prevention have not been assorted until date.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to review the literature and evaluate whether any conclusion can be drawn regarding the effectiveness of any measure on preventing bypass-related CHS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically reviewed PubMed and Cochrane Library from September 2008 to September 2018 to collect data regarding the effectiveness of pharmacologic interventions on the refers to pretreatment (PRE) of bypass-related CHS. We categorized interventions regarding their class of drugs and their combinations and calculated overall pooled estimates of proportions of CHS development through random-effects meta-analysis of proportions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded 649 studies, of which 23 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis included 23 studies/2,041 cases. In Group A (blood pressure [BP] control), 202 out of 1,174 pretreated cases developed CHS (23.3% pooled estimate; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.9-39.4), Group B (BP control + free radical scavenger [FRS]) 10/263 (0.3%; 95% CI: 0.0-14.1), Group C (BP control + antiplatelet) 22/204 (10.3%; 95% CI: 5.1-16.7), and Group D (BP control + postoperative sedation) 29/400 (6.8%; 95% CI: 4.4-9.6)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BP control alone has not been proven effective in preventing CHS. However, BP control along with either a FRS or an antiplatelet agent or postoperative sedation seems to reduce the incidence of CHS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9288,"journal":{"name":"Brain Circulation","volume":"8 4","pages":"207-214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5c/e8/BC-8-207.PMC10167845.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bc.bc_43_22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) following bypass surgery is a major cause of neurological morbidity and mortality. However, data regarding its prevention have not been assorted until date.

Objective: The objective of this study was to review the literature and evaluate whether any conclusion can be drawn regarding the effectiveness of any measure on preventing bypass-related CHS.

Methods: We systematically reviewed PubMed and Cochrane Library from September 2008 to September 2018 to collect data regarding the effectiveness of pharmacologic interventions on the refers to pretreatment (PRE) of bypass-related CHS. We categorized interventions regarding their class of drugs and their combinations and calculated overall pooled estimates of proportions of CHS development through random-effects meta-analysis of proportions.

Results: Our search yielded 649 studies, of which 23 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis included 23 studies/2,041 cases. In Group A (blood pressure [BP] control), 202 out of 1,174 pretreated cases developed CHS (23.3% pooled estimate; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.9-39.4), Group B (BP control + free radical scavenger [FRS]) 10/263 (0.3%; 95% CI: 0.0-14.1), Group C (BP control + antiplatelet) 22/204 (10.3%; 95% CI: 5.1-16.7), and Group D (BP control + postoperative sedation) 29/400 (6.8%; 95% CI: 4.4-9.6)].

Conclusions: BP control alone has not been proven effective in preventing CHS. However, BP control along with either a FRS or an antiplatelet agent or postoperative sedation seems to reduce the incidence of CHS.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物干预预防搭桥术后脑过度灌注综合征的有效性。
背景:搭桥手术后的脑过度灌注综合征(CHS)是神经系统发病率和死亡率的主要原因。然而,迄今为止,有关其预防的数据尚未分类。目的:本研究的目的是回顾文献,并评估是否可以就任何预防旁路相关CHS的措施的有效性得出任何结论。方法:从2008年9月到2018年9月,我们系统地回顾了PubMed和Cochrane图书馆,以收集有关药物干预对转流相关CHS的参考预处理(PRE)的有效性的数据。我们根据药物类别及其组合对干预措施进行了分类,并通过比例的随机效应荟萃分析计算了社区卫生服务发展比例的总体汇总估计。结果:我们的检索得到649项研究,其中23项符合纳入标准。荟萃分析包括23项研究/2041例病例。在A组(血压[BP]对照组)中,1174例预处理病例中有202例出现CHS(23.3%汇总估计值;95%置信区间[CI]:9.9-39.4),B组(血压对照+自由基清除剂[FRS])10/263(0.3%;95%CI:0.0-14.1),C组(血压控制+抗血小板)22/204(10.3%;95%CI:5.1-16.7),和D组(血压控制+术后镇静)29/400(6.8%;95%CI:4.4-9.6)]。然而,血压控制加上FRS或抗血小板药物或术后镇静似乎可以降低CHS的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Circulation
Brain Circulation Multiple-
自引率
5.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Action observation therapy impact on mirror neurons combined with acupuncture for upper limb motor impairment rehabilitation in stroke patients. Causal relationship between hypertension and ischemic stroke: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Clinical and radiographic characteristics of traumatic brain injury patients undergoing endovascular rescue for posttraumatic vasospasm. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas with pial arterial supply: A narrative review. Intravenous thrombolysis plus tirofiban versus tirofiban alone in Caucasian patients with acute anterior choroidal or paramedian pontine infarction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1