Therapeutic Effect of Argatroban During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Streptokinase During Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Porcine Model of Prolonged Cardiac Arrest.

Jensyn J VanZalen, Stephen Harvey, Pavel Hála, Annie Phillips, Takahiro Nakashima, Emre Gok, Mohamad Hakam Tiba, Brendan M McCracken, Joseph E Hill, Jinhui Liao, Joshua Jung, Joshua Mergos, William C Stacey, Robert H Bartlett, Cindy H Hsu, Alvaro Rojas-Peña, Robert W Neumar
{"title":"Therapeutic Effect of Argatroban During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Streptokinase During Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Porcine Model of Prolonged Cardiac Arrest.","authors":"Jensyn J VanZalen,&nbsp;Stephen Harvey,&nbsp;Pavel Hála,&nbsp;Annie Phillips,&nbsp;Takahiro Nakashima,&nbsp;Emre Gok,&nbsp;Mohamad Hakam Tiba,&nbsp;Brendan M McCracken,&nbsp;Joseph E Hill,&nbsp;Jinhui Liao,&nbsp;Joshua Jung,&nbsp;Joshua Mergos,&nbsp;William C Stacey,&nbsp;Robert H Bartlett,&nbsp;Cindy H Hsu,&nbsp;Alvaro Rojas-Peña,&nbsp;Robert W Neumar","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prolonged cardiac arrest (CA) causes microvascular thrombosis which is a potential barrier to organ reperfusion during extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that early intra-arrest anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and thrombolytic therapy during ECPR improve recovery of brain and heart function in a porcine model of prolonged out-of-hospital CA.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized interventional trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University laboratory.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Swine.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>In a blinded study, 48 swine were subjected to 8 minutes of ventricular fibrillation CA followed by 30 minutes of goal-directed CPR and 8 hours of ECPR. Animals were randomized into four groups (<i>n</i> = 12) and given either placebo (P) or argatroban (ARG; 350 mg/kg) at minute 12 of CA and either placebo (P) or streptokinase (STK, 1.5 MU) at the onset of ECPR.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Primary outcomes included recovery of cardiac function measured by cardiac resuscitability score (CRS: range 0-6) and recovery of brain function measured by the recovery of somatosensory-evoked potential (SSEP) cortical response amplitude. There were no significant differences in recovery of cardiac function as measured by CRS between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.16): P + P 2.3 (1.0); ARG + P = 3.4 (2.1); P + STK = 1.6 (2.0); ARG + STK = 2.9 (2.1). There were no significant differences in the maximum recovery of SSEP cortical response relative to baseline between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.73): P + P = 23% (13%); ARG + P = 20% (13%); P + STK = 25% (14%); ARG + STK = 26% (13%). Histologic analysis demonstrated reduced myocardial necrosis and neurodegeneration in the ARG + STK group relative to the P + P group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this swine model of prolonged CA treated with ECPR, early intra-arrest anticoagulation during goal-directed CPR and thrombolytic therapy during ECPR did not improve initial recovery of heart and brain function but did reduce histologic evidence of ischemic injury. The impact of this therapeutic strategy on the long-term recovery of cardiovascular and neurological function requires further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 5","pages":"e0902"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/83/fa/cc9-5-e0902.PMC10174369.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Prolonged cardiac arrest (CA) causes microvascular thrombosis which is a potential barrier to organ reperfusion during extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that early intra-arrest anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and thrombolytic therapy during ECPR improve recovery of brain and heart function in a porcine model of prolonged out-of-hospital CA.

Design: Randomized interventional trial.

Setting: University laboratory.

Subjects: Swine.

Interventions: In a blinded study, 48 swine were subjected to 8 minutes of ventricular fibrillation CA followed by 30 minutes of goal-directed CPR and 8 hours of ECPR. Animals were randomized into four groups (n = 12) and given either placebo (P) or argatroban (ARG; 350 mg/kg) at minute 12 of CA and either placebo (P) or streptokinase (STK, 1.5 MU) at the onset of ECPR.

Measurements and main results: Primary outcomes included recovery of cardiac function measured by cardiac resuscitability score (CRS: range 0-6) and recovery of brain function measured by the recovery of somatosensory-evoked potential (SSEP) cortical response amplitude. There were no significant differences in recovery of cardiac function as measured by CRS between groups (p = 0.16): P + P 2.3 (1.0); ARG + P = 3.4 (2.1); P + STK = 1.6 (2.0); ARG + STK = 2.9 (2.1). There were no significant differences in the maximum recovery of SSEP cortical response relative to baseline between groups (p = 0.73): P + P = 23% (13%); ARG + P = 20% (13%); P + STK = 25% (14%); ARG + STK = 26% (13%). Histologic analysis demonstrated reduced myocardial necrosis and neurodegeneration in the ARG + STK group relative to the P + P group.

Conclusions: In this swine model of prolonged CA treated with ECPR, early intra-arrest anticoagulation during goal-directed CPR and thrombolytic therapy during ECPR did not improve initial recovery of heart and brain function but did reduce histologic evidence of ischemic injury. The impact of this therapeutic strategy on the long-term recovery of cardiovascular and neurological function requires further investigation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿加曲班心肺复苏和链激酶体外心肺复苏对长时间心脏骤停猪模型的治疗作用。
长时间心脏骤停(CA)引起微血管血栓形成,是体外心肺复苏(ECPR)过程中器官再灌注的潜在障碍。本研究的目的是验证在长时间院外ca猪模型中,心肺复苏(CPR)期间的早期停搏内抗凝和ECPR期间的溶栓治疗是否能改善脑和心脏功能的恢复。环境:大学实验室。主题:猪。干预措施:在一项盲法研究中,48头猪接受了8分钟的心室颤动CA,随后进行了30分钟的目标定向CPR和8小时的ECPR。动物随机分为四组(n = 12),分别给予安慰剂(P)或阿加曲班(ARG);350 mg/kg),在ECPR开始时使用安慰剂(P)或链激酶(STK, 1.5 MU)。测量结果和主要结果:主要结果包括心脏复苏评分(CRS:范围0-6)测量的心功能恢复和躯体感觉诱发电位(SSEP)皮层反应幅度恢复测量的脑功能恢复。两组间CRS测量的心功能恢复无显著差异(p = 0.16): p + p 2.3 (1.0);Arg + p = 3.4 (2.1);P + STK = 1.6 (2.0);Arg + STK = 2.9(2.1)。相对于基线,两组间SSEP皮质反应的最大恢复无显著差异(p = 0.73): p + p = 23% (13%);Arg + p = 20% (13%);P + STK = 25% (14%);Arg + STK = 26%(13%)。组织学分析显示,与P + P组相比,ARG + STK组心肌坏死和神经退行性变减少。结论:在这个接受ECPR治疗的延长CA猪模型中,目标导向CPR期间的早期停搏内抗凝和ECPR期间的溶栓治疗并没有改善心脏和大脑功能的初始恢复,但确实减少了缺血性损伤的组织学证据。这种治疗策略对心血管和神经功能长期恢复的影响有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Dosing Frontier: Retrospective Assessment of Effluent Flow Rates and Residual Renal Function Among Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Hemodynamic Determinants of Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury Racial Differences in Accuracy of Predictive Models for High-Flow Nasal Cannula Failure in COVID-19 Knowledge and Practice Gaps in Pediatric Neurocritical Care Nursing: Lessons Learned From a Specialized Educational Boot Camp Unifying Fluid Responsiveness and Tolerance With Physiology: A Dynamic Interpretation of the Diamond–Forrester Classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1