Understanding and addressing populations whose prior experience has led to mistrust in healthcare.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Israel Journal of Health Policy Research Pub Date : 2023-04-21 DOI:10.1186/s13584-023-00565-w
Dan Even, Shifra Shvarts
{"title":"Understanding and addressing populations whose prior experience has led to mistrust in healthcare.","authors":"Dan Even,&nbsp;Shifra Shvarts","doi":"10.1186/s13584-023-00565-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Policy makers need to maintain public trust in healthcare systems in order to foster citizen engagement in recommended behaviors and treatments. The importance of such commitment has been highlighted by the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Central to public trust is the extent of the accountability of health authorities held responsible for long-term effects of past treatments. This paper addresses the topic of manifestations of trust among patients damaged by radiation treatments for ringworm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this mixed-methods case study (quan/qual), we sampled 600 files of Israeli patients submitting claims to the National Center for Compensation of Scalp Ringworm Victims in the years 1995-2014, following damage from radiation treatments received between 1946 and 1960 in Israel and/or abroad. Qualitative data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, and correlations were analyzed with chi-square tests. Verbal data were analyzed by the use of systematic content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 527 patients whose files were included in the final analysis, 42% held authorities responsible. Assigning responsibility to authorities was more prevalent among claimants born in Israel than among those born and treated abroad (χ<sup>2</sup> = 6.613, df = 1, p = 0.01), claimants reporting trauma (χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.864, df = 1, p = 0.027), and claimants living in central cities compared with those in suburban areas (χ<sup>2</sup> = 18.859, df = 6, p < 0.01). Men, younger claimants, patients with a psychiatric diagnosis, and patients from minority populations expressed mistrust in health regulators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Examining populations' perceived trust in healthcare institutions and tailoring health messages to vulnerable populations can promote public trust in healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":46694,"journal":{"name":"Israel Journal of Health Policy Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10120492/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Journal of Health Policy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-023-00565-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Policy makers need to maintain public trust in healthcare systems in order to foster citizen engagement in recommended behaviors and treatments. The importance of such commitment has been highlighted by the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Central to public trust is the extent of the accountability of health authorities held responsible for long-term effects of past treatments. This paper addresses the topic of manifestations of trust among patients damaged by radiation treatments for ringworm.

Methods: For this mixed-methods case study (quan/qual), we sampled 600 files of Israeli patients submitting claims to the National Center for Compensation of Scalp Ringworm Victims in the years 1995-2014, following damage from radiation treatments received between 1946 and 1960 in Israel and/or abroad. Qualitative data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, and correlations were analyzed with chi-square tests. Verbal data were analyzed by the use of systematic content analysis.

Results: Among 527 patients whose files were included in the final analysis, 42% held authorities responsible. Assigning responsibility to authorities was more prevalent among claimants born in Israel than among those born and treated abroad (χ2 = 6.613, df = 1, p = 0.01), claimants reporting trauma (χ2 = 4.864, df = 1, p = 0.027), and claimants living in central cities compared with those in suburban areas (χ2 = 18.859, df = 6, p < 0.01). Men, younger claimants, patients with a psychiatric diagnosis, and patients from minority populations expressed mistrust in health regulators.

Conclusions: Examining populations' perceived trust in healthcare institutions and tailoring health messages to vulnerable populations can promote public trust in healthcare systems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解和解决那些先前经历导致对医疗保健不信任的人群。
背景:决策者需要维持公众对医疗保健系统的信任,以促进公民参与推荐的行为和治疗。最近的COVID-19大流行凸显了这种承诺的重要性。公众信任的核心是对过去治疗的长期影响负责的卫生当局的问责程度。本文讨论了放射治疗损伤的癣患者之间的信任表现。方法:在这个混合方法的案例研究中,我们抽样了1995-2014年期间向国家头皮癣受害者赔偿中心提交索赔的600名以色列患者,这些患者在1946年至1960年期间在以色列和/或国外接受放射治疗造成的损伤。定性资料采用描述性统计分析,相关性采用卡方检验分析。口头资料采用系统的内容分析法进行分析。结果:在纳入最终分析的527例患者中,42%的患者认为当局有责任。在以色列出生的索赔人比在国外出生和治疗的索赔人更普遍地将责任分配给当局(χ2 = 6.613, df = 1, p = 0.01),索赔人报告创伤(χ2 = 4.864, df = 1, p = 0.027),居住在中心城市的索赔人比居住在郊区的索赔人更普遍(χ2 = 18.859, df = 6, p)。检查民众对卫生保健机构的感知信任,并为弱势群体量身定制卫生信息,可以促进公众对卫生保健系统的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.40%
发文量
38
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Motivations of Israeli physicians to return, or not, to Israel after their fellowship abroad. Kidnapping-Induced Trauma and secondary stress in armed conflicts: a comparative study among women in hostage families, volunteers, and the General Population. A prediction model of PTSD in the Israeli population in the aftermath of october 7th, 2023, terrorist attack and the Israel-Hamas war. Trends in Israeli clinical trials registration "MyTrial". Prescription opioid use in Israel - the tide has risen, but it's not a tidal wave.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1