Assessing the Impact of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Policy Guidance on Part D Prescriptions Among Hospice Patients.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-16 DOI:10.1177/10499091231176048
Katherine Irvin, Panagiota Kitsantas, Janusz Wojtusiak, Sanja Avramovic, Hong Xue
{"title":"Assessing the Impact of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Policy Guidance on Part D Prescriptions Among Hospice Patients.","authors":"Katherine Irvin, Panagiota Kitsantas, Janusz Wojtusiak, Sanja Avramovic, Hong Xue","doi":"10.1177/10499091231176048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hospice care facilities are required to provide prescription drugs related to a hospice patient's terminal illness. From October 2010 to present, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has issued a series of communications regarding Medicare paying for hospice patients' prescription drugs under Part D that should be covered under the hospice Medicare Part A benefit. On April 4, 2011, CMS issued specific policy guidance to providers aimed at preventing inappropriate billing. While CMS has documented Part D prescription decreases in hospice patients, no research exists that connects these decreases and the policy guidance. This study aims to evaluate the effect of the April 4, 2011, policy guidance on hospice patients' Part D prescriptions. This study employed generalized estimating equations to assess (1) total monthly average prescriptions of all medications and (2) four categories of commonly prescribed hospice medications in pre-and-post policy guidance. This research used the Medicare claims of 113,260 Part D-enrolled Medicare male patients aged 66 and older between April 2009 and March 2013, including 110,547 non-hospice patients and 2713 hospice patients. Hospice patients' monthly average total Part D prescriptions decreased from 7.3 pre-policy guidance to 6.5 medications following the issuing of the guidance, while the four categories of hospice-specific medications decreased from .57 to .49. The findings of this study show that CMS's guidance issued to providers to prevent the inappropriate billing of hospice patients' prescriptions to the Part D benefit may lead to Part D prescription decreases as observed in this sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":50810,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"302-308"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091231176048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hospice care facilities are required to provide prescription drugs related to a hospice patient's terminal illness. From October 2010 to present, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has issued a series of communications regarding Medicare paying for hospice patients' prescription drugs under Part D that should be covered under the hospice Medicare Part A benefit. On April 4, 2011, CMS issued specific policy guidance to providers aimed at preventing inappropriate billing. While CMS has documented Part D prescription decreases in hospice patients, no research exists that connects these decreases and the policy guidance. This study aims to evaluate the effect of the April 4, 2011, policy guidance on hospice patients' Part D prescriptions. This study employed generalized estimating equations to assess (1) total monthly average prescriptions of all medications and (2) four categories of commonly prescribed hospice medications in pre-and-post policy guidance. This research used the Medicare claims of 113,260 Part D-enrolled Medicare male patients aged 66 and older between April 2009 and March 2013, including 110,547 non-hospice patients and 2713 hospice patients. Hospice patients' monthly average total Part D prescriptions decreased from 7.3 pre-policy guidance to 6.5 medications following the issuing of the guidance, while the four categories of hospice-specific medications decreased from .57 to .49. The findings of this study show that CMS's guidance issued to providers to prevent the inappropriate billing of hospice patients' prescriptions to the Part D benefit may lead to Part D prescription decreases as observed in this sample.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心政策指南对安宁疗护患者 D 部分处方的影响。
安寧療護設施必須提供與安寧療護病人末期疾病有關的處方藥。從 2010 年 10 月至今,聯邦醫療保險與醫療補助服務中心(Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services,簡稱 CMS)發佈了一系列通訊,內容關於聯邦醫療保險在 D 部分支付安寧療護病人的處方藥,而這些處方藥應該由安寧療護聯邦醫療保險 A 部分福利承保。2011年4月4日,CMS向医疗服务提供者发布了具体的政策指南,旨在防止不当收费。虽然 CMS 记录了安宁疗护患者 D 部分处方药的减少,但没有研究将这些减少与政策指导联系起来。本研究旨在评估 2011 年 4 月 4 日政策指南对安宁疗护患者 D 部分处方的影响。本研究采用了广义估计方程来评估(1)所有药物的月平均处方总量和(2)政策指导前后安宁疗护常用处方药的四个类别。这项研究使用了 2009 年 4 月至 2013 年 3 月期间 113,260 名 66 岁及以上参加了 D 部分医疗保险的男性患者的医疗保险报销单,其中包括 110,547 名非临终关怀患者和 2713 名临终关怀患者。安宁疗护患者的每月平均 D 部分处方总量从政策指导发布前的 7.3 种药物减少到指导发布后的 6.5 种药物,而四类安宁疗护特定药物则从 0.57 种减少到 0.49 种。本研究结果表明,CMS 为防止安宁疗护患者的处方被不适当地计入 D 部分福利而向医疗服务提供者发布的指导意见,可能会导致 D 部分处方的减少,正如本样本中所观察到的那样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
169
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine (AJHPM) is a peer-reviewed journal, published eight times a year. In 30 years of publication, AJHPM has highlighted the interdisciplinary team approach to hospice and palliative medicine as related to the care of the patient and family. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Perceptions of Families and Nurses After Signing a Do-Not-Resuscitate Order for Patients in Respiratory Care Wards Differences in Timely Goals of Care Discussions in Nursing Homes Among Black Residents A Way Forward for Comprehensive Cancer Caregiver Support Development of a Hospice Perceptions Instrument for Diverse Patients and Families: Establishing Content and Face Validity Antibiotics at End of Life: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going? A Narrative Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1