Paradoxical effects from stimulus density manipulation provide new insight into the impact of sleep deprivation on PVT performance.

Kimberly A Honn, Hans P A Van Dongen
{"title":"Paradoxical effects from stimulus density manipulation provide new insight into the impact of sleep deprivation on PVT performance.","authors":"Kimberly A Honn,&nbsp;Hans P A Van Dongen","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpac045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>The psychomotor vigilance test (PVT), a 10-min one-choice reaction time task with random response-stimulus intervals (RSIs) between 2 and 10 s, is highly sensitive to behavioral alertness deficits due to sleep loss. To investigate what drives the performance deficits, we conducted an in-laboratory total sleep deprivation (TSD) study and compared performance on the PVT to performance on a 10-min high-density PVT (HD-PVT) with increased stimulus density and truncated RSI range between 2 and 5 s. We hypothesized that the HD-PVT would show greater impairments from TSD than the standard PVT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><i>n</i> = 86 healthy adults were randomized (2:1 ratio) to 38 h of TSD (<i>n</i> = 56) or corresponding well-rested control (<i>n</i> = 30). The HD-PVT was administered when subjects had been awake for 34 h (TSD group) or 10 h (control group). Performance on the HD-PVT was compared to performance on the standard PVTs administered 1 h earlier and 1 h later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HD-PVT yielded approximately 60% more trials than the standard PVT. The HD-PVT had faster mean response times (RTs) and equivalent lapses (RTs > 500 ms) compared to the standard PVT, with no differences between the TSD effects on mean RT and lapses between tasks. Further, the HD-PVT had a dampened time-on-task effect in both the TSD and control conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contrary to expectation, the HD-PVT did not show greater performance impairment during TSD, indicating that stimulus density and RSI range are not primary drivers of the PVT's responsiveness to sleep loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":74808,"journal":{"name":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","volume":"4 1","pages":"zpac045"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/56/70/zpac045.PMC10108643.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpac045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Study objectives: The psychomotor vigilance test (PVT), a 10-min one-choice reaction time task with random response-stimulus intervals (RSIs) between 2 and 10 s, is highly sensitive to behavioral alertness deficits due to sleep loss. To investigate what drives the performance deficits, we conducted an in-laboratory total sleep deprivation (TSD) study and compared performance on the PVT to performance on a 10-min high-density PVT (HD-PVT) with increased stimulus density and truncated RSI range between 2 and 5 s. We hypothesized that the HD-PVT would show greater impairments from TSD than the standard PVT.

Methods: n = 86 healthy adults were randomized (2:1 ratio) to 38 h of TSD (n = 56) or corresponding well-rested control (n = 30). The HD-PVT was administered when subjects had been awake for 34 h (TSD group) or 10 h (control group). Performance on the HD-PVT was compared to performance on the standard PVTs administered 1 h earlier and 1 h later.

Results: The HD-PVT yielded approximately 60% more trials than the standard PVT. The HD-PVT had faster mean response times (RTs) and equivalent lapses (RTs > 500 ms) compared to the standard PVT, with no differences between the TSD effects on mean RT and lapses between tasks. Further, the HD-PVT had a dampened time-on-task effect in both the TSD and control conditions.

Conclusions: Contrary to expectation, the HD-PVT did not show greater performance impairment during TSD, indicating that stimulus density and RSI range are not primary drivers of the PVT's responsiveness to sleep loss.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刺激密度操纵的悖论效应为睡眠剥夺对PVT表现的影响提供了新的见解。
研究目的:心理运动警觉测试(PVT)是一项10分钟的一次性反应时间任务,随机反应刺激间隔(RSI)在2到10秒之间,对睡眠不足引起的行为警觉缺陷高度敏感。为了研究是什么导致了表现缺陷,我们进行了一项实验室内完全睡眠剥夺(TSD)研究,并将PVT的表现与10分钟高密度PVT(HD-PVT)的表现进行了比较,其中刺激密度增加,RSI范围缩短在2到5 s之间。我们假设HD-PVT会比标准PVT表现出更大的TSD损伤。方法: = 86名健康成年人被随机分配(2:1的比例)到38小时的TSD(n = 56)或相应的休息良好的对照(n = 30)。当受试者清醒34小时(TSD组)或10小时(对照组)时给予HD-PVT。将HD-PVT的表现与1小时前和1小时后给予的标准PVT的表现进行比较。结果:HD-PVT的试验结果比标准PVT多出约60%。HD-PVT具有更快的平均响应时间(RT)和等效失效时间(RT > 500ms),而TSD对平均RT的影响和任务之间的失误之间没有差异。此外,HD-PVT在TSD和控制条件下都具有抑制的任务时间效应。结论:与预期相反,HD-PVT在TSD期间没有表现出更大的表现障碍,这表明刺激密度和RSI范围不是PVT对睡眠损失反应的主要驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A life of research on everyday sleep(iness). How openness and inquisitiveness led to a career as a sleep researcher and a broad contribution to sleep science. How did I come to sleep research and stay there? Looking beyond sleep duration in understanding obesity risk in adolescents: the role of circadian timing and misalignment on adolescent dietary outcomes, physical activity, and body mass index. The relationships between wanting to nap, actually napping, and depressed and anxious mood.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1