Redefining caregiver strain for family caregivers in end-of-life care in Hong Kong.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Palliative & Supportive Care Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1017/S1478951523000020
Amy Yin Man Chow, Genevieve Ataa Fordjour, Keyuan Jiao, Nahri Jung, Iris Kwan Ning Chan, Chak Nam Kuok
{"title":"Redefining caregiver strain for family caregivers in end-of-life care in Hong Kong.","authors":"Amy Yin Man Chow, Genevieve Ataa Fordjour, Keyuan Jiao, Nahri Jung, Iris Kwan Ning Chan, Chak Nam Kuok","doi":"10.1017/S1478951523000020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Caregiving for family members at their end of life is stressful. Caregivers' strain, burden, or stress has been measured in various geographical and sociodemographic contexts. The concept of stress, burden, and strain are sometimes used interchangeably. By analysing the factor structure of the Chinese version of the Modified Caregiver Strain Index (C-M-CSI), this study aimed to examine the caregiving strain concept and its demographic correlates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of 453 family caregivers of patients with a terminal illness in Hong Kong was employed. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed. In addition, generalized linear models (GLM) were used to examine the demographic correlates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EFA yielded a 3-factor model termed \"Perception of Caregiving,\" \"Empathetic Strain,\" and \"Adjustment Demand.\" This 3-factor model explained 50% of the variance and showed good internal consistency. The CFA confirmed the 3-factor construct with satisfactory internal reliability (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> [61, <i>N</i> = 226] = 108.86, <i>p</i> < 0.001, CFI = 0.96, TLI = 0.95, SRMR = 0.04, and RMSEA = 0.06). Inspired by this factor structure and concepts of stress and strain from engineering discipline, a new model of caregiver strain is proposed. Additionally, family caregivers of non-cancer patients, who were not living with the patient, or younger were associated negatively with different dimensions of caregiver strain.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>The results gave insights into the advancement of the conceptualization of caregiver strain, its multidimensional nature, and process of change, which inform directions for future research and practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":" ","pages":"767-774"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951523000020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Caregiving for family members at their end of life is stressful. Caregivers' strain, burden, or stress has been measured in various geographical and sociodemographic contexts. The concept of stress, burden, and strain are sometimes used interchangeably. By analysing the factor structure of the Chinese version of the Modified Caregiver Strain Index (C-M-CSI), this study aimed to examine the caregiving strain concept and its demographic correlates.

Methods: A sample of 453 family caregivers of patients with a terminal illness in Hong Kong was employed. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed. In addition, generalized linear models (GLM) were used to examine the demographic correlates.

Results: The EFA yielded a 3-factor model termed "Perception of Caregiving," "Empathetic Strain," and "Adjustment Demand." This 3-factor model explained 50% of the variance and showed good internal consistency. The CFA confirmed the 3-factor construct with satisfactory internal reliability (χ2 [61, N = 226] = 108.86, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.96, TLI = 0.95, SRMR = 0.04, and RMSEA = 0.06). Inspired by this factor structure and concepts of stress and strain from engineering discipline, a new model of caregiver strain is proposed. Additionally, family caregivers of non-cancer patients, who were not living with the patient, or younger were associated negatively with different dimensions of caregiver strain.

Significance of results: The results gave insights into the advancement of the conceptualization of caregiver strain, its multidimensional nature, and process of change, which inform directions for future research and practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新定义香港临终关怀家庭照护者的照护压力。
目的:照顾生命末期的家人是一件压力很大的事情。照顾者的压力、负担或应激已在不同的地域和社会人口背景下进行了测量。压力、负担和应变的概念有时会交替使用。本研究旨在通过分析中文版 "改良照顾者压力指数"(C-M-CSI)的因子结构,研究照顾者压力概念及其人口统计学相关因素:方法:本研究以香港 453 名绝症患者的家庭照顾者为样本。研究进行了探索性因子分析(EFA)和确认性因子分析(CFA)。此外,还使用了广义线性模型(GLM)来研究人口统计学相关因素:EFA得出了一个3因素模型,即 "护理感知"、"移情压力 "和 "调整需求"。该 3 因子模型解释了 50% 的方差,并显示出良好的内部一致性。CFA 证实 3 因子结构具有令人满意的内部信度(χ2 [61, N = 226] = 108.86, p 结果的显著性:研究结果对照护者压力概念的发展、其多维性和变化过程提供了启示,为今后的研究和实践指明了方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
期刊最新文献
An interpretative qualitative case study of a Compassionate Cities initiative in the United Kingdom: Lessons for implementation in other settings. Stigma in Mexican patients with Lung Cancer: Psychometric Properties of the Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (CLCSS) - Brief version. Benefit-finding in children with advanced cancer and their parents. Predictors of mortality among older adults discharged to or readmitted from a skilled nursing facility. Nurses' models of spiritual care: Predictors of spiritual care competence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1