EXITitis in the UK: Gravity Estimates in the Aftermath of Brexit.

IF 2.4 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Economist-Netherlands Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-29 DOI:10.1007/s10645-023-09421-3
Steven Brakman, Harry Garretsen, Tristan Kohl
{"title":"EXITitis in the UK: Gravity Estimates in the Aftermath of Brexit.","authors":"Steven Brakman,&nbsp;Harry Garretsen,&nbsp;Tristan Kohl","doi":"10.1007/s10645-023-09421-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union has had disruptive effects on international trade. As part of its 'Global Britain' strategy in the wake of Brexit, the UK is pursuing a series of Free Trade Agreements with countries around the world, including Canada, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Norway, Switzerland, Turkey and possibly the United States. Closer to home, the UK is under mounting pressure to dissuade Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales from seeking independence to regain the severed ties with the EU. We analyze the economic consequences of these scenarios with a state-of-the-art structural gravity model for major economies around the world. We find that 'Global Britain' yields insufficient trade creation to compensate for Brexit-induced trade losses. Our results also reveal that secession from the UK in itself would inflict greater post-Brexit economic harm on the devolved nations of Great Britain. Nevertheless, these effects could be offset when secession from the UK is combined with regained EU membership.</p>","PeriodicalId":46156,"journal":{"name":"Economist-Netherlands","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10147905/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economist-Netherlands","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-023-09421-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union has had disruptive effects on international trade. As part of its 'Global Britain' strategy in the wake of Brexit, the UK is pursuing a series of Free Trade Agreements with countries around the world, including Canada, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Norway, Switzerland, Turkey and possibly the United States. Closer to home, the UK is under mounting pressure to dissuade Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales from seeking independence to regain the severed ties with the EU. We analyze the economic consequences of these scenarios with a state-of-the-art structural gravity model for major economies around the world. We find that 'Global Britain' yields insufficient trade creation to compensate for Brexit-induced trade losses. Our results also reveal that secession from the UK in itself would inflict greater post-Brexit economic harm on the devolved nations of Great Britain. Nevertheless, these effects could be offset when secession from the UK is combined with regained EU membership.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国的EXITitis:英国脱欧后的重力估计。
联合王国退出欧洲联盟对国际贸易产生了破坏性影响。作为英国脱欧后“全球英国”战略的一部分,英国正在与世界各国达成一系列自由贸易协定,其中包括加拿大、日本、韩国、墨西哥、挪威、瑞士、土耳其,可能还有美国。在国内,英国面临着越来越大的压力,要求其劝阻苏格兰、北爱尔兰和威尔士寻求独立,以恢复与欧盟断绝的关系。我们使用最先进的全球主要经济体结构重力模型来分析这些情景的经济后果。我们发现,“全球英国”产生的贸易创造不足,无法弥补英国脱欧造成的贸易损失。我们的研究结果还表明,脱离英国本身将对脱欧后的英国权力下放国家造成更大的经济伤害。然而,当脱离英国与重新获得欧盟成员国身份相结合时,这些影响可能会被抵消。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Since 1852, De Economist, the Netherlands Economic Review, has provided an outlet for high quality research in economics. Emphasizing European issues, it offers insightful studies that deal with theoretical issues as well as applied work. The journal also publishes important surveys of current research. Authors of articles based on empirical research are required to make their datasets available to readers, enabling them to replicate the research results. Officially cited as: De Economist
期刊最新文献
The Price of Flexible Jobs: Wage Differentials between Permanent and Flexible Jobs in the Netherlands Distortions in Investment Timing and Quantity in Real Options with Asymmetric Information Call for Papers: Special Issue on "Scientific Insights to Deliver Sustainable Growth and Full Employment" Call for Papers: Special Issue on “Inequality in the Housing Market” Foreign Supply Shocks and the Structure of Trade in a Small Open Economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1