Behavioral intentions assessment of a disposable e-cigarette among adult current, former, and non-smokers in the United States

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Drug Testing and Analysis Pub Date : 2023-03-06 DOI:10.1002/dta.3467
Christopher Russell, Willie J. McKinney, Ian M. Fearon
{"title":"Behavioral intentions assessment of a disposable e-cigarette among adult current, former, and non-smokers in the United States","authors":"Christopher Russell,&nbsp;Willie J. McKinney,&nbsp;Ian M. Fearon","doi":"10.1002/dta.3467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Modeling the public health effects of e-cigarettes requires estimates of the likelihood that different individuals and population subgroups will start using e-cigarettes and subsequently transition to and from combustible cigarette use. To begin to generate input values for modeling efforts, this study assessed adults' behavioral intentions in relation to a disposable e-cigarette, “BIDI® Stick.” An online questionnaire assessed intentions to try and use a BIDI® Stick regularly in 11 flavor variants among United States (U.S.) nationally representative samples of adult (21+ years) non-smokers (<i>n</i> = 2284), current smokers (<i>n</i> = 2391), former smokers (<i>n</i> = 2241), and young adult (21–24 years) non-smokers (<i>n</i> = 1140) of combustible cigarettes following exposure to product information and images. Current smokers rated their intentions to use a BIDI® Stick to partially or completely replace cigarettes. Positive intention to try a BIDI® Stick at least once was, for each flavor variant, highest among current smokers (22.4%–28.1%), lower among former smokers (6.0%–9.7%) and non-smokers (3.4%–5.2%), and lowest among never-smokers (1.0%–2.4%). Among current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers, trial and regular use intentions were lowest among e-cigarette non-users and e-cigarette never-users. Approximately 23.6% of current smokers reported an intention to use a BIDI® Stick in at least one flavor to completely switch from cigarettes and/or to reduce cigarette consumption. Low trial and regular use intentions suggest that U.S. adults who do not currently smoke cigarettes and/or use e-cigarettes are unlikely to initiate use of the BIDI® Stick e-cigarette. Trial and regular use intentions are highest among adults who currently smoke cigarettes and/or use e-cigarettes. A moderate proportion of current smokers may try using a BIDI® Stick e-cigarette as a partial or complete replacement for combustible cigarettes.</p>","PeriodicalId":160,"journal":{"name":"Drug Testing and Analysis","volume":"15 10","pages":"1233-1256"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Testing and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dta.3467","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Modeling the public health effects of e-cigarettes requires estimates of the likelihood that different individuals and population subgroups will start using e-cigarettes and subsequently transition to and from combustible cigarette use. To begin to generate input values for modeling efforts, this study assessed adults' behavioral intentions in relation to a disposable e-cigarette, “BIDI® Stick.” An online questionnaire assessed intentions to try and use a BIDI® Stick regularly in 11 flavor variants among United States (U.S.) nationally representative samples of adult (21+ years) non-smokers (n = 2284), current smokers (n = 2391), former smokers (n = 2241), and young adult (21–24 years) non-smokers (n = 1140) of combustible cigarettes following exposure to product information and images. Current smokers rated their intentions to use a BIDI® Stick to partially or completely replace cigarettes. Positive intention to try a BIDI® Stick at least once was, for each flavor variant, highest among current smokers (22.4%–28.1%), lower among former smokers (6.0%–9.7%) and non-smokers (3.4%–5.2%), and lowest among never-smokers (1.0%–2.4%). Among current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers, trial and regular use intentions were lowest among e-cigarette non-users and e-cigarette never-users. Approximately 23.6% of current smokers reported an intention to use a BIDI® Stick in at least one flavor to completely switch from cigarettes and/or to reduce cigarette consumption. Low trial and regular use intentions suggest that U.S. adults who do not currently smoke cigarettes and/or use e-cigarettes are unlikely to initiate use of the BIDI® Stick e-cigarette. Trial and regular use intentions are highest among adults who currently smoke cigarettes and/or use e-cigarettes. A moderate proportion of current smokers may try using a BIDI® Stick e-cigarette as a partial or complete replacement for combustible cigarettes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一次性电子烟在美国成人吸烟者、戒烟者和非吸烟者中的行为意向评估
建立电子烟对公共健康影响的模型需要估计不同个人和人群亚组开始使用电子烟并随后过渡到可燃香烟使用和从可燃香烟使用过渡到可燃烟使用的可能性。为了开始为建模工作产生输入值,这项研究评估了成年人对一次性电子烟“BIDI®Stick”的行为意向。一份在线问卷评估了在美国全国代表性成人样本(21+ 年)非吸烟者(n = 2284),目前吸烟者(n = 2391),曾吸烟(n = 2241),以及年轻人(21-24 年)非吸烟者(n = 1140)。目前的吸烟者对他们使用BIDI®烟棒部分或完全替代香烟的意图进行了评级。对于每种口味的变体,至少尝试一次BIDI®棒的积极意愿在当前吸烟者中最高(22.4%-28.1%),在以前吸烟者(6.0%-9.7%)和非吸烟者中较低(3.4%-5.2%),而在从不吸烟者中最低(1.0%-2.4%),在不使用电子烟和从不使用电子烟的人群中,试验和常规使用意愿最低。大约23.6%的当前吸烟者表示,他们打算使用至少一种口味的BIDI®烟棒来完全戒烟和/或减少吸烟量。低试验和常规使用意向表明,目前不吸烟和/或不使用电子烟的美国成年人不太可能开始使用BIDI®Stick电子烟。目前吸烟和/或使用电子烟的成年人的试用和定期使用意愿最高。目前有一定比例的吸烟者可能会尝试使用BIDI®Stick电子烟作为可燃香烟的部分或全部替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Testing and Analysis
Drug Testing and Analysis BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
24.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: As the incidence of drugs escalates in 21st century living, their detection and analysis have become increasingly important. Sport, the workplace, crime investigation, homeland security, the pharmaceutical industry and the environment are just some of the high profile arenas in which analytical testing has provided an important investigative tool for uncovering the presence of extraneous substances. In addition to the usual publishing fare of primary research articles, case reports and letters, Drug Testing and Analysis offers a unique combination of; ‘How to’ material such as ‘Tutorials’ and ‘Reviews’, Speculative pieces (‘Commentaries’ and ‘Perspectives'', providing a broader scientific and social context to the aspects of analytical testing), ‘Annual banned substance reviews’ (delivering a critical evaluation of the methods used in the characterization of established and newly outlawed compounds). Rather than focus on the application of a single technique, Drug Testing and Analysis employs a unique multidisciplinary approach to the field of controversial compound determination. Papers discussing chromatography, mass spectrometry, immunological approaches, 1D/2D gel electrophoresis, to name just a few select methods, are welcomed where their application is related to any of the six key topics listed below.
期刊最新文献
Determination of Hormonal Growth Promotants in Beef Using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Detecting EPO in Microvolumetric Capillary Serum Shipped at Ambient Temperature for Antidoping Testing. Investigation Into the Equine Metabolism of Phosphodiesterase-4 Inhibitor Roflumilast for Potential Doping Control. UHPLC-QTOFMS Urine Drug Screening With Dilute-and-Shoot Sample Preparation and Vacuum-Insulated Probe-Heated Electrospray Ionization. Cover Picture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1