The Role of Confidence and Knowledge in Intentions to (Not) Seek Care for Hypertension: Evidence From a National Survey.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Medical Decision Making Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1177/0272989X221148196
Wändi Bruine de Bruin, Yasmina Okan, Tamar Krishnamurti, Mark D Huffman
{"title":"The Role of Confidence and Knowledge in Intentions to (Not) Seek Care for Hypertension: Evidence From a National Survey.","authors":"Wändi Bruine de Bruin,&nbsp;Yasmina Okan,&nbsp;Tamar Krishnamurti,&nbsp;Mark D Huffman","doi":"10.1177/0272989X221148196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension (high blood pressure) is a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, patients may lack confidence in their understanding of what constitutes normal/healthy blood pressure, potentially affecting intentions to seek necessary care. The American Heart Association defines normal/healthy blood pressure as <120/80 mm Hg, with a 130/80 mm Hg threshold for hypertension diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our US sample (<i>N</i> = 6,592) included 1,342 adults with hypertension alone and 795 with hypertension and relevant comorbidities (heart disease, kidney disease, and diabetes mellitus). We assessed confidence in understanding blood pressure numbers, knowledge of thresholds for normal/healthy blood pressure (\"normal or healthy blood pressure is below . . .\"; counting 120-130/80 mm Hg as correct), and intentions to seek care for randomly assigned blood pressure readings of 142/91 (stage 2 hypertension), 132/69 (stage 1 hypertension), or 118/78 mm Hg (normal/healthy blood pressure).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among nonhypertensive participants, 55% expressed confidence in their understanding of blood pressure numbers, but only 36% knew the upper thresholds for normal/healthy blood pressure. Among participants with hypertension alone, 78% were confident while 47% were knowledgeable. Among participants with hypertension and comorbidities, 81% were confident and 40% were knowledgeable. Participants who were confident (v. not) were more likely to express intentions to act on stage 2 hypertension readings but less likely to express intentions to act on stage 1 readings, even after adjustment for knowledge, hypertension diagnosis, and sociodemographics.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Confidence, knowledge, and intentions were each measured with 1 question.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Independent of knowledge, confidence was associated with greater willingness to act on stage 2 hypertension readings but reduced willingness to act on stage 1 hypertension readings. Interventions aiming to improve hypertension care-seeking behavior should improve confidence in accurate knowledge.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Hypertension or high blood pressure is a major risk factor for heart disease.Most Americans do not know that normal/healthy blood pressure levels are ≤120/80 mm Hg, yet they are confident that they know this information.Inappropriate confidence in understanding of blood pressure numbers undermines intentions to seek care for stage 1 hypertension blood pressure readings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49839,"journal":{"name":"Medical Decision Making","volume":"43 4","pages":"461-477"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10164674/pdf/nihms-1857886.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X221148196","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hypertension (high blood pressure) is a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, patients may lack confidence in their understanding of what constitutes normal/healthy blood pressure, potentially affecting intentions to seek necessary care. The American Heart Association defines normal/healthy blood pressure as <120/80 mm Hg, with a 130/80 mm Hg threshold for hypertension diagnosis.

Methods: Our US sample (N = 6,592) included 1,342 adults with hypertension alone and 795 with hypertension and relevant comorbidities (heart disease, kidney disease, and diabetes mellitus). We assessed confidence in understanding blood pressure numbers, knowledge of thresholds for normal/healthy blood pressure ("normal or healthy blood pressure is below . . ."; counting 120-130/80 mm Hg as correct), and intentions to seek care for randomly assigned blood pressure readings of 142/91 (stage 2 hypertension), 132/69 (stage 1 hypertension), or 118/78 mm Hg (normal/healthy blood pressure).

Results: Among nonhypertensive participants, 55% expressed confidence in their understanding of blood pressure numbers, but only 36% knew the upper thresholds for normal/healthy blood pressure. Among participants with hypertension alone, 78% were confident while 47% were knowledgeable. Among participants with hypertension and comorbidities, 81% were confident and 40% were knowledgeable. Participants who were confident (v. not) were more likely to express intentions to act on stage 2 hypertension readings but less likely to express intentions to act on stage 1 readings, even after adjustment for knowledge, hypertension diagnosis, and sociodemographics.

Limitations: Confidence, knowledge, and intentions were each measured with 1 question.

Conclusions: Independent of knowledge, confidence was associated with greater willingness to act on stage 2 hypertension readings but reduced willingness to act on stage 1 hypertension readings. Interventions aiming to improve hypertension care-seeking behavior should improve confidence in accurate knowledge.

Highlights: Hypertension or high blood pressure is a major risk factor for heart disease.Most Americans do not know that normal/healthy blood pressure levels are ≤120/80 mm Hg, yet they are confident that they know this information.Inappropriate confidence in understanding of blood pressure numbers undermines intentions to seek care for stage 1 hypertension blood pressure readings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信心和知识在有意(不)寻求高血压护理中的作用:来自全国调查的证据。
背景:高血压是一种可改变的心血管疾病危险因素。然而,患者可能对正常/健康血压的理解缺乏信心,这可能会影响他们寻求必要护理的意愿。美国心脏协会将正常/健康血压定义为:方法:我们的美国样本(N = 6592)包括1342名单独患有高血压的成年人和795名高血压及相关合并症(心脏病、肾病和糖尿病)的成年人。我们评估了对血压数字的理解信心,对正常/健康血压阈值的认识(“正常或健康血压低于……”;将120-130/80毫米汞柱计算为正确),并在随机分配的血压读数为142/91(2期高血压)、132/69(1期高血压)或118/78毫米汞柱(正常/健康血压)时寻求护理。结果:在非高血压参与者中,55%的人对自己的血压数字表示有信心,但只有36%的人知道正常/健康血压的上限。在单独患有高血压的参与者中,78%的人有信心,47%的人有知识。在有高血压和合并症的参与者中,81%的人有信心,40%的人有知识。即使在调整了知识、高血压诊断和社会人口统计数据后,自信(或不自信)的参与者更有可能表达对第2阶段高血压读数采取行动的意愿,但对第1阶段读数采取行动的意愿较少。局限性:信心、知识和意图各用一个问题来衡量。结论:独立于知识之外,信心与更大的意愿对2期高血压读数采取行动相关,但降低了对1期高血压读数采取行动的意愿。旨在改善高血压求诊行为的干预措施应提高对准确知识的信心。重点:高血压是心脏病的主要危险因素。大多数美国人不知道正常/健康的血压水平是≤120/80毫米汞柱,但他们有信心知道这个信息。对血压数字理解的不适当的信心破坏了寻求1期高血压读数护理的意图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Decision Making
Medical Decision Making 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Decision Making offers rigorous and systematic approaches to decision making that are designed to improve the health and clinical care of individuals and to assist with health care policy development. Using the fundamentals of decision analysis and theory, economic evaluation, and evidence based quality assessment, Medical Decision Making presents both theoretical and practical statistical and modeling techniques and methods from a variety of disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Veterans' Lung Cancer Risk Conceptualizations versus Lung Cancer Screening Shared Decision-Making Conversations with Clinicians: A Qualitative Study. Unclear Trajectory and Uncertain Benefit: Creating a Lexicon for Clinical Uncertainty in Patients with Critical or Advanced Illness Using a Delphi Consensus Process. Multi-indication Evidence Synthesis in Oncology Health Technology Assessment: Meta-analysis Methods and Their Application to a Case Study of Bevacizumab. Use of Adaptive Conjoint Analysis-Based Values Clarification in a Patient Decision Aid Is Not Associated with Better Perceived Values Clarity or Reduced Decisional Conflict but Enhances Values Congruence. A Sequential Calibration Approach to Address Challenges of Repeated Calibration of a COVID-19 Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1