Positive Affect Processes and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms: Findings from an Open Label and Uncontrolled Pilot Study using the Positive Memory Processing Technique.

IF 1.8 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY INTEGRATION Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-10 DOI:10.1037/int0000292
Ateka A Contractor, Danica C Slavish, James Thornton, Nicole H Weiss
{"title":"Positive Affect Processes and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms: Findings from an Open Label and Uncontrolled Pilot Study using the Positive Memory Processing Technique.","authors":"Ateka A Contractor, Danica C Slavish, James Thornton, Nicole H Weiss","doi":"10.1037/int0000292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, a five-session Processing of Positive Memories Technique (PPMT) was proposed as a novel intervention for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). One purported outcome of and mechanism underlying PPMT's effects on PTSD is improved positive affect processes. In this uncontrolled pilot study, we examined whether PPMT was associated with decreases in PTSD severity; and whether changes in positive affect levels, reactivity, and dysregulation related to changes in PTSD severity across sessions. The sample included 16 trauma-exposed participants seeking services at a University Psychology Clinic (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub>=27.44 years; 68.80% women). Multilevel linear growth models examined the main effects of each positive affect variable and their interactions with time on PTSD severity. PTSD severity decreased across PPMT treatment in each model (<i>bs</i>=-0.43 to -0.33; <i>d</i>=-0.03; <i>ps</i><.001-0.008). There was a main effect of positive emotion dysregulation (<i>b</i>=1.16, <i>d</i>=0.11; <i>p</i>=0.009), but not of positive affect levels (<i>p</i>=0.821) or reactivity (<i>p</i>=0.356) on PTSD severity. However, positive affect processes did not modify the trajectory of PTSD severity across treatment. Regarding PTSD symptom clusters, there was an interaction between positive affect levels and time on alterations in arousal and reactivity (AAR) cluster severity (<i>b</i>=-0.01, <i>p</i>=0.036); individuals with positive affect levels 1 SD above the mean (<i>b</i>=-0.18, <i>p</i><0.01) and at the mean (<i>b</i>=-0.10, <i>p</i>=0.01) had greater decreases in AAR cluster severity across treatment compared to individuals with positive affect levels 1 SD below the mean (<i>b</i>=-0.02, <i>p</i>=0.710). Findings suggest that PPMT may relate to improved PTSD symptoms; and that positive affect levels/dysregulation may be worthwhile targets for future investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":46982,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY INTEGRATION","volume":"33 1","pages":"102-122"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10174277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY INTEGRATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, a five-session Processing of Positive Memories Technique (PPMT) was proposed as a novel intervention for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). One purported outcome of and mechanism underlying PPMT's effects on PTSD is improved positive affect processes. In this uncontrolled pilot study, we examined whether PPMT was associated with decreases in PTSD severity; and whether changes in positive affect levels, reactivity, and dysregulation related to changes in PTSD severity across sessions. The sample included 16 trauma-exposed participants seeking services at a University Psychology Clinic (Mage=27.44 years; 68.80% women). Multilevel linear growth models examined the main effects of each positive affect variable and their interactions with time on PTSD severity. PTSD severity decreased across PPMT treatment in each model (bs=-0.43 to -0.33; d=-0.03; ps<.001-0.008). There was a main effect of positive emotion dysregulation (b=1.16, d=0.11; p=0.009), but not of positive affect levels (p=0.821) or reactivity (p=0.356) on PTSD severity. However, positive affect processes did not modify the trajectory of PTSD severity across treatment. Regarding PTSD symptom clusters, there was an interaction between positive affect levels and time on alterations in arousal and reactivity (AAR) cluster severity (b=-0.01, p=0.036); individuals with positive affect levels 1 SD above the mean (b=-0.18, p<0.01) and at the mean (b=-0.10, p=0.01) had greater decreases in AAR cluster severity across treatment compared to individuals with positive affect levels 1 SD below the mean (b=-0.02, p=0.710). Findings suggest that PPMT may relate to improved PTSD symptoms; and that positive affect levels/dysregulation may be worthwhile targets for future investigations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
积极情绪过程与创伤后应激障碍症状:使用积极记忆处理技术进行的开放标签和非对照试点研究的结果。
最近,一种为期五节的 "积极记忆处理技术"(PPMT)被认为是治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的新型干预方法。据称,PPMT 对创伤后应激障碍的效果及其机制之一是改善积极情绪过程。在这项非对照试点研究中,我们考察了PPMT是否与创伤后应激障碍严重程度的降低有关,以及积极情绪水平、反应性和调节失调的变化是否与创伤后应激障碍严重程度在各疗程中的变化有关。样本包括16名在大学心理诊所寻求服务的创伤暴露参与者(年龄=27.44岁;68.80%为女性)。多层次线性增长模型检验了每个积极情绪变量的主效应及其与时间的交互作用对创伤后应激障碍严重程度的影响。在每个模型中,创伤后应激障碍的严重程度在PPMT治疗过程中都有所下降(bs=-0.43至-0.33;d=-0.03;psb=1.16,d=0.11;p=0.009),但积极情绪水平(p=0.821)或反应性(p=0.356)对创伤后应激障碍严重程度的影响却没有下降。然而,积极情绪过程并没有改变创伤后应激障碍严重程度在不同治疗中的变化轨迹。关于创伤后应激障碍症状群,积极情绪水平和时间对唤醒和反应性(AAR)群严重程度的改变存在交互作用(b=-0.01,p=0.036);与积极情绪水平低于平均值1 SD的个体相比(b=-0.02,p=0.710),积极情绪水平高于平均值1 SD的个体在整个治疗过程中AAR群严重程度的下降幅度更大(b=-0.18,pb=-0.10,p=0.01)。研究结果表明,PPMT可能与创伤后应激障碍症状的改善有关;积极情绪水平/失调可能是未来值得研究的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY INTEGRATION
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY INTEGRATION PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Journal of Psychotherapy Integration offers original peer-reviewed papers that move beyond the confines of single-school or single-theory approaches to psychotherapy and behavior change. The journal publishes articles that significantly advance the knowledge of psychotherapy integration and present new data, theory, or clinical techniques relevant to psychotherapy integration. Coverage includes articles integrating the knowledge of psychotherapy and behavior change with developments in the broader fields of psychology and psychiatry (e.g., cognitive sciences, psychobiology, health psychology, and social psychology). (formerly published by Kluwer Academic/Plenum)
期刊最新文献
Observer and client perceptions of therapist multicultural orientation in a jail setting. Using values interventions to improve exposure therapy engagement in specific phobias. A qualitative study of clients with chronic pain who participated in an integrative mind/body psychotherapy intervention. Assessing interpersonal impact of veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder and moral injury: A case study of how significant others perceive veterans undergoing a positive psychology intervention. Therapeutic presence, working alliance, and clients’ attitudes toward online therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1