Assessment of Selective and Universal Screening for Suicide Risk in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) Pub Date : 2023-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-14 DOI:10.1176/appi.focus.23021007
Jordan E DeVylder, Taylor C Ryan, Mary Cwik, Mary Ellen Wilson, Samantha Jay, Paul S Nestadt, Mitchell Goldstein, Holly C Wilcox
{"title":"Assessment of Selective and Universal Screening for Suicide Risk in a Pediatric Emergency Department.","authors":"Jordan E DeVylder, Taylor C Ryan, Mary Cwik, Mary Ellen Wilson, Samantha Jay, Paul S Nestadt, Mitchell Goldstein, Holly C Wilcox","doi":"10.1176/appi.focus.23021007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>According to National Patient Safety Goal 15.01.01, all individuals being treated or evaluated for behavioral health conditions as their primary reason for care in hospitals and behavioral health care organizations accredited by The Joint Commission should be screened for suicide risk using a validated tool. Existing suicide risk screens have minimal or no high-quality evidence of association with future suicide-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the association between results of the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) instrument in a pediatric emergency department (ED), implemented through selective and universal screening approaches, and subsequent suicide-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design setting and participants: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study at an urban pediatric ED in the United States, the ASQ was administered to youths aged 8 to 18 years with behavioral and psychiatric presenting problems from March 18, 2013, to December 31, 2016 (selective condition), and then to youths aged 10 to 18 years with medical presenting problems (in addition to those aged 8-18 years with behavioral and psychiatric presenting problems) from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018 (universal condition).</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Positive ASQ screen at baseline ED visit.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The main outcomes were subsequent ED visits with suicide-related presenting problems (ie, ideation or attempts) based on electronic health records and death by suicide identified through state medical examiner records. Association with suicide-related outcomes was calculated over the entire study period using survival analyses and at 3-month follow-up for both conditions using relative risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The complete sample was 15003 youths (7044 47.0%] male; 10209 [68.0%] black; mean [SD] age, 14.5 [3.1] years at baseline). The follow-up for the selective condition was a mean (SD) of 1133.7 (433.3) days; for the universal condition, it was 366.2 (209.2) days. In the selective condition, there were 275 suicide-related ED visits and 3 deaths by suicide. In the universal condition, there were 118 suicide-related ED visits and no deaths during the follow-up period. Adjusting for demographic characteristics and baseline presenting problem, positive ASQ screens were associated with greater risk of suicide-related outcomes among both the universal sample (hazard ratio, 6.8 [95% CI, 4.2-11.1]) and the selective sample (hazard ratio, 4.8 [95% CI, 3.5-6.5]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Positive results of both selective and universal screening for suicide risk in pediatric EDs appear to be associated with subsequent suicidal behavior. Screening may be a particularly effective way to detect suicide risk among those who did not present with ideation or attempt. Future studies should examine the impact of screening in combination with other policies and procedures aimed at reducing suicide risk.Appeared originally in <i>JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e1914070</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":73036,"journal":{"name":"Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172558/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.23021007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: According to National Patient Safety Goal 15.01.01, all individuals being treated or evaluated for behavioral health conditions as their primary reason for care in hospitals and behavioral health care organizations accredited by The Joint Commission should be screened for suicide risk using a validated tool. Existing suicide risk screens have minimal or no high-quality evidence of association with future suicide-related outcomes.

Objective: To test the association between results of the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) instrument in a pediatric emergency department (ED), implemented through selective and universal screening approaches, and subsequent suicide-related outcomes.

Design setting and participants: In this retrospective cohort study at an urban pediatric ED in the United States, the ASQ was administered to youths aged 8 to 18 years with behavioral and psychiatric presenting problems from March 18, 2013, to December 31, 2016 (selective condition), and then to youths aged 10 to 18 years with medical presenting problems (in addition to those aged 8-18 years with behavioral and psychiatric presenting problems) from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018 (universal condition).

Exposure: Positive ASQ screen at baseline ED visit.

Main outcomes and measures: The main outcomes were subsequent ED visits with suicide-related presenting problems (ie, ideation or attempts) based on electronic health records and death by suicide identified through state medical examiner records. Association with suicide-related outcomes was calculated over the entire study period using survival analyses and at 3-month follow-up for both conditions using relative risk.

Results: The complete sample was 15003 youths (7044 47.0%] male; 10209 [68.0%] black; mean [SD] age, 14.5 [3.1] years at baseline). The follow-up for the selective condition was a mean (SD) of 1133.7 (433.3) days; for the universal condition, it was 366.2 (209.2) days. In the selective condition, there were 275 suicide-related ED visits and 3 deaths by suicide. In the universal condition, there were 118 suicide-related ED visits and no deaths during the follow-up period. Adjusting for demographic characteristics and baseline presenting problem, positive ASQ screens were associated with greater risk of suicide-related outcomes among both the universal sample (hazard ratio, 6.8 [95% CI, 4.2-11.1]) and the selective sample (hazard ratio, 4.8 [95% CI, 3.5-6.5]).

Conclusions and relevance: Positive results of both selective and universal screening for suicide risk in pediatric EDs appear to be associated with subsequent suicidal behavior. Screening may be a particularly effective way to detect suicide risk among those who did not present with ideation or attempt. Future studies should examine the impact of screening in combination with other policies and procedures aimed at reducing suicide risk.Appeared originally in JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e1914070.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估儿科急诊室自杀风险的选择性筛查和普遍性筛查。
重要性:根据国家患者安全目标 15.01.01,在联合委员会认证的医院和行为医疗机构中,所有以行为健康状况为主要治疗或评估原因的患者都应使用经过验证的工具进行自杀风险筛查。现有的自杀风险筛查与未来自杀相关结果的关联性证据极少或没有高质量的证据:目的:测试儿科急诊室(ED)通过选择性和普遍性筛查方法实施的自杀筛查问题(ASQ)工具的结果与后续自杀相关结果之间的关联:在美国一个城市儿科急诊室进行的这项回顾性队列研究中,从2013年3月18日至2016年12月31日(选择性条件),对出现行为和精神问题的8至18岁青少年进行了ASQ筛查,然后从2017年1月1日至2018年12月31日(普遍性条件),对出现医疗问题的10至18岁青少年(除了出现行为和精神问题的8至18岁青少年)进行了ASQ筛查:主要结果和测量指标:主要结果是基于电子健康记录的与自杀相关的症状(即意念或企图)的后续急诊就诊,以及通过州法医记录确定的自杀死亡。在整个研究期间,采用生存分析法计算与自杀相关结果的相关性,并采用相对风险法计算这两种情况在3个月随访期间的相关性:完整样本共有 15003 名青少年(7044 47.0%] 男性;10209 [68.0%] 黑人;平均 [SD] 年龄,基线为 14.5 [3.1] 岁)。选择性条件下的随访平均(标清)为 1133.7 (433.3) 天;普遍条件下的随访平均(标清)为 366.2 (209.2) 天。在选择性条件下,共有 275 人因自杀到急诊室就诊,3 人死于自杀。在普遍情况下,随访期间有 118 人因自杀到急诊室就诊,无人死亡。对人口统计学特征和基线出现的问题进行调整后,ASQ筛查结果呈阳性与普遍样本(危险比为6.8 [95% CI, 4.2-11.1])和选择性样本(危险比为4.8 [95% CI, 3.5-6.5])中自杀相关结果的风险更高相关:儿科急诊室选择性和普遍性自杀风险筛查的阳性结果似乎与随后的自杀行为有关。筛查可能是发现未出现自杀意念或自杀未遂者自杀风险的一种特别有效的方法。未来的研究应考察筛查与其他旨在降低自杀风险的政策和程序相结合所产生的影响。原载于:JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e1914070。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anorexia Nervosa Across the Lifespan: A Review of Recent Literature. Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder: Review and Recent Advances. Building Confidence in Discussing Genetics With Patients With Eating Disorders and Their Families. Bulimia Nervosa and Binge-Eating Disorder Across the Lifespan. Charting a Path Toward Improving Detection and Clinical Outcomes for Eating Disorders in Cismales and Gender-Diverse Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1