Translating radiology reports into plain language using ChatGPT and GPT-4 with prompt learning: results, limitations, and potential.

4区 计算机科学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art Pub Date : 2023-05-18 DOI:10.1186/s42492-023-00136-5
Qing Lyu, Josh Tan, Michael E Zapadka, Janardhana Ponnatapura, Chuang Niu, Kyle J Myers, Ge Wang, Christopher T Whitlow
{"title":"Translating radiology reports into plain language using ChatGPT and GPT-4 with prompt learning: results, limitations, and potential.","authors":"Qing Lyu, Josh Tan, Michael E Zapadka, Janardhana Ponnatapura, Chuang Niu, Kyle J Myers, Ge Wang, Christopher T Whitlow","doi":"10.1186/s42492-023-00136-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The large language model called ChatGPT has drawn extensively attention because of its human-like expression and reasoning abilities. In this study, we investigate the feasibility of using ChatGPT in experiments on translating radiology reports into plain language for patients and healthcare providers so that they are educated for improved healthcare. Radiology reports from 62 low-dose chest computed tomography lung cancer screening scans and 76 brain magnetic resonance imaging metastases screening scans were collected in the first half of February for this study. According to the evaluation by radiologists, ChatGPT can successfully translate radiology reports into plain language with an average score of 4.27 in the five-point system with 0.08 places of information missing and 0.07 places of misinformation. In terms of the suggestions provided by ChatGPT, they are generally relevant such as keeping following-up with doctors and closely monitoring any symptoms, and for about 37% of 138 cases in total ChatGPT offers specific suggestions based on findings in the report. ChatGPT also presents some randomness in its responses with occasionally over-simplified or neglected information, which can be mitigated using a more detailed prompt. Furthermore, ChatGPT results are compared with a newly released large model GPT-4, showing that GPT-4 can significantly improve the quality of translated reports. Our results show that it is feasible to utilize large language models in clinical education, and further efforts are needed to address limitations and maximize their potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":52384,"journal":{"name":"Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10192466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42492-023-00136-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The large language model called ChatGPT has drawn extensively attention because of its human-like expression and reasoning abilities. In this study, we investigate the feasibility of using ChatGPT in experiments on translating radiology reports into plain language for patients and healthcare providers so that they are educated for improved healthcare. Radiology reports from 62 low-dose chest computed tomography lung cancer screening scans and 76 brain magnetic resonance imaging metastases screening scans were collected in the first half of February for this study. According to the evaluation by radiologists, ChatGPT can successfully translate radiology reports into plain language with an average score of 4.27 in the five-point system with 0.08 places of information missing and 0.07 places of misinformation. In terms of the suggestions provided by ChatGPT, they are generally relevant such as keeping following-up with doctors and closely monitoring any symptoms, and for about 37% of 138 cases in total ChatGPT offers specific suggestions based on findings in the report. ChatGPT also presents some randomness in its responses with occasionally over-simplified or neglected information, which can be mitigated using a more detailed prompt. Furthermore, ChatGPT results are compared with a newly released large model GPT-4, showing that GPT-4 can significantly improve the quality of translated reports. Our results show that it is feasible to utilize large language models in clinical education, and further efforts are needed to address limitations and maximize their potential.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 ChatGPT 和 GPT-4 将放射学报告翻译成通俗易懂的语言,并进行及时学习:结果、局限性和潜力。
名为 ChatGPT 的大型语言模型因其类似人类的表达和推理能力而受到广泛关注。在本研究中,我们研究了使用 ChatGPT 将放射学报告翻译成通俗易懂的语言供患者和医疗服务提供者使用的可行性,从而使他们受到教育,改善医疗服务。本研究收集了二月上半月 62 份低剂量胸部计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查扫描和 76 份脑磁共振成像转移筛查扫描的放射报告。根据放射科医生的评估,ChatGPT 可以成功地将放射科报告翻译成通俗易懂的语言,在五分制中平均得分 4.27 分,信息缺失 0.08 处,信息错误 0.07 处。就 ChatGPT 提供的建议而言,这些建议普遍具有相关性,如继续随访医生和密切监测任何症状,在总共 138 个病例中,ChatGPT 根据报告中的发现提供了约 37% 的具体建议。ChatGPT 的回复也有一定的随机性,偶尔会出现过于简化或忽略信息的情况,这可以通过更详细的提示来缓解。此外,我们还将 ChatGPT 的结果与新发布的大型模型 GPT-4 进行了比较,结果表明 GPT-4 可以显著提高翻译报告的质量。我们的研究结果表明,在临床教育中使用大型语言模型是可行的,但还需要进一步努力解决其局限性并最大限度地发挥其潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art
Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Discrimination between leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 antibody encephalitis and gamma-aminobutyric acid B receptor antibody encephalitis based on ResNet18. Hyperparameter optimization for cardiovascular disease data-driven prognostic system. Survey of methods and principles in three-dimensional reconstruction from two-dimensional medical images. Vision transformer architecture and applications in digital health: a tutorial and survey. DB-DCAFN: dual-branch deformable cross-attention fusion network for bacterial segmentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1