Screening for and Responding to Suicidality Among Youth Presenting to a Children's Advocacy Center (CAC).

IF 4.5 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Child Maltreatment Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-17 DOI:10.1177/10775595231163592
Lindsay D Shepard, Kristine A Campbell, Kara A Byrne, Brian Thorn, Brooks R Keeshin
{"title":"Screening for and Responding to Suicidality Among Youth Presenting to a Children's Advocacy Center (CAC).","authors":"Lindsay D Shepard, Kristine A Campbell, Kara A Byrne, Brian Thorn, Brooks R Keeshin","doi":"10.1177/10775595231163592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Youth presenting to a Children's Advocacy Center (CAC) for a forensic interview are at increased risk for suicidality, but no data exist for suicidality or suicide screening and response at the time of the forensic interview. The current study applied a suicide and traumatic stress screening and response protocol, the Care Process Model for Pediatric Traumatic Stress (CPM-PTS), with youth (11-18 years) presenting for a forensic interview to one of 16 participating CAC locations, 2018-2020.46.2% of youth screened for traumatic stress and suicidality (<i>N</i> = 1651) endorsed thoughts of suicide or self-harm in the past two weeks, and 13.6% were assessed as high risk for suicide. High symptoms of traumatic stress increased the risk of suicidal thinking as well as of high risk suicidality. CAC workers, both clinicians and non-clinicians, facilitated screening and provided prevention response. Suicide screening and response at the CAC at the time of the forensic interview appears important and feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":48052,"journal":{"name":"Child Maltreatment","volume":" ","pages":"272-282"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11218667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Maltreatment","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595231163592","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Youth presenting to a Children's Advocacy Center (CAC) for a forensic interview are at increased risk for suicidality, but no data exist for suicidality or suicide screening and response at the time of the forensic interview. The current study applied a suicide and traumatic stress screening and response protocol, the Care Process Model for Pediatric Traumatic Stress (CPM-PTS), with youth (11-18 years) presenting for a forensic interview to one of 16 participating CAC locations, 2018-2020.46.2% of youth screened for traumatic stress and suicidality (N = 1651) endorsed thoughts of suicide or self-harm in the past two weeks, and 13.6% were assessed as high risk for suicide. High symptoms of traumatic stress increased the risk of suicidal thinking as well as of high risk suicidality. CAC workers, both clinicians and non-clinicians, facilitated screening and provided prevention response. Suicide screening and response at the CAC at the time of the forensic interview appears important and feasible.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
筛查并应对到儿童保护中心(CAC)就诊的青少年的自杀倾向。
到儿童咨询中心(CAC)接受法医面谈的青少年自杀风险较高,但目前还没有关于法医面谈时自杀或自杀筛查和应对的数据。目前的研究采用了自杀和创伤压力筛查及应对方案,即儿科创伤压力护理流程模型(CPM-PTS),对2018-2020年期间前往16个参与CAC地点之一进行法医面谈的青少年(11-18岁)进行了筛查。46.2%接受创伤压力和自杀筛查的青少年(N = 1651)认可在过去两周内有自杀或自残的想法,13.6%被评估为自杀高风险。创伤应激症状严重会增加自杀想法和高自杀风险。CAC 的工作人员(包括临床医生和非临床医生)协助进行筛查并提供预防应对措施。在法医面谈时在 CAC 进行自杀筛查和采取应对措施似乎是重要和可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Child Maltreatment
Child Maltreatment Multiple-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.80%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Child Maltreatment is the official journal of the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children (APSAC), the nation"s largest interdisciplinary child maltreatment professional organization. Child Maltreatment"s object is to foster professional excellence in the field of child abuse and neglect by reporting current and at-issue scientific information and technical innovations in a form immediately useful to practitioners and researchers from mental health, child protection, law, law enforcement, medicine, nursing, and allied disciplines. Child Maltreatment emphasizes perspectives with a rigorous scientific base that are relevant to policy, practice, and research.
期刊最新文献
Child Protective Services Reports After Reunification: An Examination of the Risk of Being Rereported to Child Protective Services After Returning Home From Foster Care. Factors Associated With Permanency for Children in Out-Of-Home Placement: A Survival Analysis. Clinical Consultation During a Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Community-Based Learning Collaborative: Examination of Consultation Content, Consultative Strategies, and Provider Engagement. Contamination in Observational Research on Child Maltreatment: A Conceptual and Empirical Review With Implications for Future Research. Prevalence of Diverse Genders and Sexualities in Australia and Associations With Five Forms of Child Maltreatment and Multi-type Maltreatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1