Applications of Speech Analysis in Psychiatry.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Harvard Review of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1097/HRP.0000000000000356
Katerina Dikaios, Sheri Rempel, Sri Harsha Dumpala, Sageev Oore, Michael Kiefte, Rudolf Uher
{"title":"Applications of Speech Analysis in Psychiatry.","authors":"Katerina Dikaios, Sheri Rempel, Sri Harsha Dumpala, Sageev Oore, Michael Kiefte, Rudolf Uher","doi":"10.1097/HRP.0000000000000356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The need for objective measurement in psychiatry has stimulated interest in alternative indicators of the presence and severity of illness. Speech may offer a source of information that bridges the subjective and objective in the assessment of mental disorders. We systematically reviewed the literature for articles exploring speech analysis for psychiatric applications. The utility of speech analysis depends on how accurately speech features represent clinical symptoms within and across disorders. We identified four domains of the application of speech analysis in the literature: diagnostic classification, assessment of illness severity, prediction of onset of illness, and prognosis and treatment outcomes. We discuss the findings in each of these domains, with a focus on how types of speech features characterize different aspects of psychopathology. Models that bring together multiple speech features can distinguish speakers with psychiatric disorders from healthy controls with high accuracy. Differentiating between types of mental disorders and symptom dimensions are more complex problems that expose the transdiagnostic nature of speech features. Convergent progress in speech research and computer sciences opens avenues for implementing speech analysis to enhance objectivity of assessment in clinical practice. Application of speech analysis will need to address issues of ethics and equity, including the potential to perpetuate discriminatory bias through models that learn from clinical assessment data. Methods that mitigate bias are available and should play a key role in the implementation of speech analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12915,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Review of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Review of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000356","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The need for objective measurement in psychiatry has stimulated interest in alternative indicators of the presence and severity of illness. Speech may offer a source of information that bridges the subjective and objective in the assessment of mental disorders. We systematically reviewed the literature for articles exploring speech analysis for psychiatric applications. The utility of speech analysis depends on how accurately speech features represent clinical symptoms within and across disorders. We identified four domains of the application of speech analysis in the literature: diagnostic classification, assessment of illness severity, prediction of onset of illness, and prognosis and treatment outcomes. We discuss the findings in each of these domains, with a focus on how types of speech features characterize different aspects of psychopathology. Models that bring together multiple speech features can distinguish speakers with psychiatric disorders from healthy controls with high accuracy. Differentiating between types of mental disorders and symptom dimensions are more complex problems that expose the transdiagnostic nature of speech features. Convergent progress in speech research and computer sciences opens avenues for implementing speech analysis to enhance objectivity of assessment in clinical practice. Application of speech analysis will need to address issues of ethics and equity, including the potential to perpetuate discriminatory bias through models that learn from clinical assessment data. Methods that mitigate bias are available and should play a key role in the implementation of speech analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语音分析在精神病学中的应用。
摘要:精神病学对客观测量的需求激发了人们对疾病存在和严重程度的替代指标的兴趣。在评估精神障碍时,言语可能是连接主观和客观的信息来源。我们对文献进行了系统性的梳理,以查找探讨语音分析在精神科应用的文章。言语分析的实用性取决于言语特征在疾病内部和疾病之间如何准确地反映临床症状。我们在文献中确定了语音分析应用的四个领域:诊断分类、疾病严重程度评估、发病预测以及预后和治疗结果。我们讨论了每个领域的研究结果,重点是语音特征类型如何描述精神病理学的不同方面。汇集多种语音特征的模型可以高精度地区分患有精神障碍的说话者和健康对照者。区分精神障碍类型和症状维度是更为复杂的问题,暴露了语音特征的跨诊断性质。语音研究和计算机科学的共同进步为在临床实践中实施语音分析以提高评估的客观性开辟了道路。语音分析的应用需要解决伦理和公平问题,包括通过从临床评估数据中学习的模型可能造成的歧视性偏见。减轻偏见的方法是可用的,并应在语音分析的实施中发挥关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Harvard Review of Psychiatry is the authoritative source for scholarly reviews and perspectives on important topics in psychiatry. Founded by the Harvard Medical School''s Department of Psychiatry, the Harvard Review of Psychiatry features review papers that summarize and synthesize the key literature in a scholarly and clinically relevant manner. Topics covered include: Schizophrenia and related disorders; Mood disorders; Personality disorders; Substance use disorders; Anxiety; Neuroscience; Psychosocial aspects of psychiatry; Ethics; Psychiatric education; and much more. In addition, a Clinical Challenges section presents a case with discussion from a panel of experts. Brief reviews are presented in topic-specific columns that include Cross-Cultural Psychiatry, History of Psychiatry, Ethics, and others.
期刊最新文献
Emotional Eating in Primary Care: Considerations for Assessment and Management. Lupus on the Mind: A Case of Psychosis in Uncontrolled Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Psychological Assessment for Gender-Affirming Care in Transgender and Nonbinary Youth: The Companionship Model. Announcing the Shelly F. Greenfield MD, MPH Award for Best Manuscript by an Early Career Author. Ketamine in the Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Systematic Review: Erratum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1