Assessment of Safety Requirements and Their Practices Among Teaching Laboratories of Health Institutes.

Alqeer Aliyo, Alo Edin
{"title":"Assessment of Safety Requirements and Their Practices Among Teaching Laboratories of Health Institutes.","authors":"Alqeer Aliyo,&nbsp;Alo Edin","doi":"10.1177/11786361231174414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laboratory work provides students with the ability to process skills, perform experiments and tests, and interpret experimental data. Instead of traditional teaching methods, there are good laboratory experiences to develop a conceptual understanding of science. A lack of laboratory safety requirements and practice can affect the health of students, staff, and the environment. Therefore, the current study provides updated safety requirements and practice information.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety requirements and practices among teaching laboratories at the Health Institute 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institutional-based descriptive study design was conducted on November 15-20, 2020, among staff members of the Bule Hora University Institute of Health. Seventeen randomly selected academic staffs and laboratory assistants from 2 departments participated in the study. Data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire and an observational checklist. Finally, the data were coded and entered into Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 for analysis. Data were then analyzed using simple quantitative descriptions such as frequency counts and percentages. The data are presented in a table.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the safety requirements evaluated, only 33.3% (6) were available in the laboratory. Of the safety practices evaluated, 44.6% were used all the time, 37.7% were used occasionally, and 17.6% were never practiced in the laboratory by the respondents. Of his respondents, 58.8% had never been regularly inspected for laboratory safety, and 77% had never received training in laboratory safety. Observations show that teaching laboratories in health organizations lack safety manuals/first aid diaries or guidelines, laboratory building drainage systems, adequate ventilation, water flow, and appropriate laboratory sizes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reveals poor laboratory safety practices and safety requirements in teaching laboratories. These limitations may cause health problems, environmental pollution, contamination, and chemical spills. Stakeholders should improve safety requirements and create awareness among staff, students, and lab assistants.</p>","PeriodicalId":74187,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology insights","volume":"16 ","pages":"11786361231174414"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ad/74/10.1177_11786361231174414.PMC10189843.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786361231174414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laboratory work provides students with the ability to process skills, perform experiments and tests, and interpret experimental data. Instead of traditional teaching methods, there are good laboratory experiences to develop a conceptual understanding of science. A lack of laboratory safety requirements and practice can affect the health of students, staff, and the environment. Therefore, the current study provides updated safety requirements and practice information.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety requirements and practices among teaching laboratories at the Health Institute 2021.

Methods: An institutional-based descriptive study design was conducted on November 15-20, 2020, among staff members of the Bule Hora University Institute of Health. Seventeen randomly selected academic staffs and laboratory assistants from 2 departments participated in the study. Data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire and an observational checklist. Finally, the data were coded and entered into Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 for analysis. Data were then analyzed using simple quantitative descriptions such as frequency counts and percentages. The data are presented in a table.

Results: Of the safety requirements evaluated, only 33.3% (6) were available in the laboratory. Of the safety practices evaluated, 44.6% were used all the time, 37.7% were used occasionally, and 17.6% were never practiced in the laboratory by the respondents. Of his respondents, 58.8% had never been regularly inspected for laboratory safety, and 77% had never received training in laboratory safety. Observations show that teaching laboratories in health organizations lack safety manuals/first aid diaries or guidelines, laboratory building drainage systems, adequate ventilation, water flow, and appropriate laboratory sizes.

Conclusions: This study reveals poor laboratory safety practices and safety requirements in teaching laboratories. These limitations may cause health problems, environmental pollution, contamination, and chemical spills. Stakeholders should improve safety requirements and create awareness among staff, students, and lab assistants.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生院校教学实验室安全要求评价与实践
背景:实验室工作为学生提供处理技能、进行实验和测试以及解释实验数据的能力。代替传统的教学方法,这里有很好的实验室经验来培养对科学的概念理解。缺乏实验室安全要求和实践会影响学生、员工和环境的健康。因此,目前的研究提供了最新的安全要求和实践信息。目的:本研究的目的是评估卫生研究所2021教学实验室的安全要求和实践。方法:采用基于机构的描述性研究设计,于2020年11月15-20日在蓝荷拉大学卫生研究所的工作人员中进行。从2个院系随机抽取17名教职员和实验室助理参与研究。数据通过自我管理问卷和观察清单收集。最后,对数据进行编码并输入社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)第20版进行分析。然后使用频率计数和百分比等简单的定量描述来分析数据。数据以表格形式呈现。结果:在评估的安全要求中,只有33.3%(6个)在实验室可实现。在被评估的安全操作中,44.6%的人一直在使用,37.7%的人偶尔使用,17.6%的人从未在实验室中使用过。在他的受访者中,58.8%的人从未接受过实验室安全定期检查,77%的人从未接受过实验室安全培训。观察表明,卫生组织的教学实验室缺乏安全手册/急救日记或指南、实验室建筑排水系统、充足的通风、水流和适当的实验室规模。结论:本研究揭示了教学实验室的安全规范和安全要求较差。这些限制可能导致健康问题、环境污染、污染和化学品泄漏。利益相关者应该提高安全要求,并在员工、学生和实验室助理中建立安全意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Enteric Bacterial Infections, Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern, Intestinal Parasites, and Associated Factors Among Food Handlers in Yabelo Town, Borena Zone, Southern Ethiopia Evolving VZV Strains: Necessity for Continuous Surveillance and Adaptation of Vaccination Strategies in India Bacteriological Profile and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Sepsis-Causing Bacteria at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Health Care Facility in Ghana Syphilis Outbreak in Japan, an Emerging Concern. Safeguarding India Amidst the EG.5 Variant: A Pragmatic Outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1