The need for a course to complete urological education for consultant practice using a simulated 'boot camp' structure at the end of specialist training: A survey-based study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Scottish Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1177/00369330231163376
Karl H Pang, Sunjay Jain, Chandra Shekhar Biyani, Stephen R Payne
{"title":"The need for a course to complete urological education for consultant practice using a simulated 'boot camp' structure at the end of specialist training: A survey-based study.","authors":"Karl H Pang,&nbsp;Sunjay Jain,&nbsp;Chandra Shekhar Biyani,&nbsp;Stephen R Payne","doi":"10.1177/00369330231163376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>To obtain opinions from urology trainees and consultants regarding the need for, and structure of, a post-specialty training Urology Simulation Boot Camp (USBC) for consultant practice.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A survey-based study was conducted, and 'Google Forms' were distributed electronically via social media. Urology specialist trainees (ST) in years 5-7 (ST5-ST7), post-certification of completion of training (CCT) fellows and ST3 boot camp faculty consultants in practice for ≤5 years and >5 years were included. One hundred and seven responses were received. 97.2% of responders thought a pre-consultant USBC was worthwhile; 55.1% selected the course duration to be 2 days. 47.7% felt that the USBC should be delivered post-exam in ST7. 91.6%, 43.9%, 73.8%, 87.9% and 74.8% considered that modules in emergency operative procedures, novel uro-technologies, delivering multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings, non-clinical consultant roles and responsibilities, stress and burnout to be important, respectively. 62.6% and 31.8% felt that the course should be wholly or part-funded by Health Education England (HEE).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A post-specialty training, pre-consultant, USBC delivered post-exam in ST7, is worthwhile and should include modules on emergency operative procedures, leading MDTs, non-clinical roles and responsibilities and managing stress and burnout in consultant careers. Ideally, it should be fully/part-funded by HEE.</p>","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":"68 2","pages":"49-57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scottish Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330231163376","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and aims: To obtain opinions from urology trainees and consultants regarding the need for, and structure of, a post-specialty training Urology Simulation Boot Camp (USBC) for consultant practice.

Methods and results: A survey-based study was conducted, and 'Google Forms' were distributed electronically via social media. Urology specialist trainees (ST) in years 5-7 (ST5-ST7), post-certification of completion of training (CCT) fellows and ST3 boot camp faculty consultants in practice for ≤5 years and >5 years were included. One hundred and seven responses were received. 97.2% of responders thought a pre-consultant USBC was worthwhile; 55.1% selected the course duration to be 2 days. 47.7% felt that the USBC should be delivered post-exam in ST7. 91.6%, 43.9%, 73.8%, 87.9% and 74.8% considered that modules in emergency operative procedures, novel uro-technologies, delivering multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings, non-clinical consultant roles and responsibilities, stress and burnout to be important, respectively. 62.6% and 31.8% felt that the course should be wholly or part-funded by Health Education England (HEE).

Conclusions: A post-specialty training, pre-consultant, USBC delivered post-exam in ST7, is worthwhile and should include modules on emergency operative procedures, leading MDTs, non-clinical roles and responsibilities and managing stress and burnout in consultant careers. Ideally, it should be fully/part-funded by HEE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在专科培训结束时使用模拟“新兵训练营”结构完成泌尿科咨询师实践教育课程的必要性:一项基于调查的研究。
背景和目的:收集泌尿外科培训生和顾问对专科培训后泌尿外科模拟训练营(USBC)的需求和结构的意见。方法和结果:进行了一项基于调查的研究,并通过社交媒体以电子方式分发“谷歌表格”。包括5-7年(ST5-ST7)泌尿外科专科培训生(ST)、完成培训后认证(CCT)研究员和ST3新兵训练营实习≤5年和>5年的教师顾问。收到了107份答复。97.2%的受访者认为咨询前的USBC是值得的;55.1%的人选择课程时间为2天。47.7%的人认为USBC应该在ST7的考试后交付。分别有91.6%、43.9%、73.8%、87.9%和74.8%的受访者认为急诊手术流程中的模块、新颖的uroo技术、提供多学科团队(MDT)会议、非临床咨询师的角色和职责、压力和倦怠是重要的。62.6%和31.8%的人认为该课程应全部或部分由英格兰健康教育(HEE)资助。结论:在ST7进行专业后培训、会诊前培训、USBC提供的会诊后考试是值得的,应该包括急诊手术程序、领导mdt、非临床角色和责任以及管理会诊职业中的压力和倦怠等模块。理想情况下,它应该由HEE全部或部分资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scottish Medical Journal
Scottish Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A unique international information source for the latest news and issues concerning the Scottish medical community. Contributions are drawn from Scotland and its medical institutions, through an array of international authors. In addition to original papers, Scottish Medical Journal publishes commissioned educational review articles, case reports, historical articles, and sponsoring society abstracts.This journal is a member of the Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and outcomes of a highland prehospital trauma response team. Pancreatic insulinomas: Our 15-year surgical experience. Influence of core stabilization exercise on physical function and muscle thickness in patients with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled clinical trial. The state of robotic surgery in Spain: Results of a national survey on robotic surgery. Ribosome-binding protein-1 (RRBP1) expression in prostate carcinomas and its relationship with clinicopathological prognostic factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1